<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for ViewSonic enters digiframe market with trio of offerings</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/viewsonic-enters-digiframe-market-with-trio-of-offerings/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for ViewSonic enters digiframe market with trio of offerings</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ViewSonic enters digiframe market with trio of offerings]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/viewsonic-enters-digiframe-market-with-trio-of-offerings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/viewsonic-enters-digiframe-market-with-trio-of-offerings/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree.... WHY?<br><br>Not Cheaper<br>Not Better Looking<br>Not Special in any way shape or form...<br><br>So Why?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[paragraph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 1:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ViewSonic enters digiframe market with trio of offerings]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/viewsonic-enters-digiframe-market-with-trio-of-offerings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/viewsonic-enters-digiframe-market-with-trio-of-offerings/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why aren't there more digital frames that support wifi?  I think a frame with wifi that could connect to flickr / picassa / smugmug would be popular for sharing between family members.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[scott]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 1:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ViewSonic enters digiframe market with trio of offerings]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/viewsonic-enters-digiframe-market-with-trio-of-offerings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/viewsonic-enters-digiframe-market-with-trio-of-offerings/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why do companies produce frames in widescreen? How many people take widescreen pics? I am still trying to find a decent 4:3 frame. :(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[stryker412]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 2:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ViewSonic enters digiframe market with trio of offerings]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/viewsonic-enters-digiframe-market-with-trio-of-offerings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/viewsonic-enters-digiframe-market-with-trio-of-offerings/</guid><description><![CDATA[I never understand these manufacturers.  Why do they make 800:400 resolution photo frames?  That ratio of 5:3 just does not make sense when most DSLRs use 3:2 and handheld autos use 4:3 (like the 800:600 and 640:480 frames).  What good is a 800:400 frame when you either get a horrible cropping or pixel padding on the edges?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 2:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ViewSonic enters digiframe market with trio of offerings]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/viewsonic-enters-digiframe-market-with-trio-of-offerings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/viewsonic-enters-digiframe-market-with-trio-of-offerings/</guid><description><![CDATA[Whoops.  I meant to say 800x480 = 5:3 ratio (and not 800x400).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 2:45PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>