<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[There's a resemblance to the new at&t logo too.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 6:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's because freakin' everyone uses an orb these days.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 6:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[I can't wait till the "shiny ball" trend is over.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NewJohnny]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 6:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Even my gay school :(<br><a href="http://www.hampsteadschool.org.uk/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hampsteadschool.org.uk/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LesbianHam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 6:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can't be as bad as the new logo for my University, they just splashed out £65,000 (almost $130,000) for it.<br><br><a href="http://www.aston.ac.uk/" rel="nofollow">http://www.aston.ac.uk/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[smiler987]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 7:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[You have got to be fucking kidding me. I could have designed something better for 10 bucks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Abuzar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 9:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[I really think the old logo was better...  I understand that companies like to update logos, but for no reason is silly.  Its one thing if the old logo was bad (cheaply made so a professional logo was made) or there was a merger and a new logo for teh new company was made, but this is a waste of new mony throwing away old money...<br>M]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BigDaddyM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 6:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[I totally dig the old logo too, looking at my printer now it looks so much nicer with the current "X" rather than having some lower-case stylized 'xerox'. Very rarely do I ever like a companies new logo..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DAZA]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2008 2:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[looks crap to me. the original had much more identity and was easily recognised.  <br><br>40 years of marketing and mind share wasted ... back to the beginning to get people to recognise it.<br><br>i bet it was some young wannabe that put the idea to the big wigs to try and impress using phrases like "the connection to customers, partners, industry and innovation" to which they all went "ooooh, ahhhh "  <br><br> <br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Fisher]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 6:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[More like hundreds of thousands of dollars. I agree, I liked the old one better. The orb must be the new swoosh. I remember in school the previous Xerox logo was used as an example of great logos along with IBM and FedEx. By the way I thought Xerox was doing well, why did they change the logo?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ekwmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 7:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[the old logo still looks fairly modern]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Macdonald]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 6:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would have stuck with the 1968 logo<br><a href="http://www.xerox.com/downloads/usa/en/n/nr_Xerox_Logo_History_2008Jan7.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.xerox.com/downloads/usa/en/n/nr_Xerox_Logo_History_2008Jan7.pdf</a><br>(sorry - pdf link)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 7:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Exactly. I don't see any reason to change a logo unless it just looks completely outdated and awful. The Xerox logo has always looked moderately contemporary. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Reader]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 7:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[they should have just made the good ol' "X" look shinier and in a slightly different font or something.. or put it in one of those shiny circles..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Macdonald]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 7:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[The old logo was much better, much more industrial. This logo just smacks of AT&T and BT "consumer friendly" branding.<br><br>And I'd go as far as to say it cost millions of dollars, rather than thousands of dollars. When the BBC changed it's logo it cost £5m ($10m).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[thomashayes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 6:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[mbna went lower case right before Bank of America bought them out. Could this hip trendy change be a ploy to be bought out?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ghen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 10:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[makes me think about my xbox.....<br><br>seems like everyone wants a flashy new logo.  it's sad to see companies drop great classic logos for new trendy ones.<br><br>btw : Sony Ericsson's dot is on the other side - it is totally different.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mixtus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 6:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good riddance. The old logo reminds me of the 15"(14 inch viewable) IBM monitor that's dusting in my basement. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Homeboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 6:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[reminds me of the 360 logo]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 6:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[That was the first thing I thought...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Keith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 11:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[needs to be added to:<br><br><a href="http://www.aclevercookie.com/the-best-and-worst-logo-remakes-of-the-century/" rel="nofollow">http://www.aclevercookie.com/the-best-and-worst-logo-remakes-of-the-century/</a><br><br>squish it, scew it, and turn it all around<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CosterMonger]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 6:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hope they haven't wasted THAT much money on this logo.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cesar Cardoso]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 6:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you think about all the places the logo appears... and how they have to change all that, it can really add up. They need new tooling for the machines that press the logo onto their products, they have to print all new literature, change their website (which is probably huge, being a global company at all), and aside from the material costs of actually doing this stuff, they've got to pay people to make sure it all happens. It can really add up.<br>-Taylor]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Taylor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 6:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Because nothing tells your shareholders you're rearranging the deck chairs on a sinking ship quite like abandoning a 40 year old logo for the latest flavor of the week.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vexorg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 6:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[That X was designed by Landor in 1995 - making it 12 or 13 years old.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Si]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2008 10:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[When I saw it by itself I thought what most people up there are thinking, but it works really well with all the redesigned templates. Everything has been redesigned, from PowerPoint templates to ID badges, and it looks really good as a whole.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 6:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Times New Roman shall never die!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anton]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 7:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[The new logo is tacky. It looks like something you'd get with one of those cheapie online logo creation services (e.g., <a href="http://logoworks.com" rel="nofollow">http://logoworks.com</a>).<br><br>The old design had a certain simple elegance that this glossy Web 2.0-esque thing just lacks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Hayford O'Leary]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 7:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is it me or do the ribbons wrapped around the ball not jibe with the 'sphereness' or the ball?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jpelzel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 7:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh... how original. Way to not stand out.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Loonie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 7:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[The red Xerox "break-up" logo isn't 40 years old.  It was introduced in the mid-90's to represent Xerox's foray into the digital world.  The logo before that (and I'm not sure of its date of origin) said XEROX in thin letters.  You can see it here: <a href="http://getfreshminds.blogs.com/getfreshminds/images/2007/05/30/xerox_logo_250.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://getfreshminds.blogs.com/getfreshminds/images/2007/05/30/xerox_logo_250.jpg</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 7:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can we say "New Coke"... albeit not a new product, but same problem. You shouldn't change logos, just update it, kinda like Dr. Pepper or Pepsi (theme of examples unintended)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[engadget]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 7:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[they should have kept some remains of the old logo like putting it in the litle circle or something]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Macdonald]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 7:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Also the "Digital X" was officially retired a few years back. So the real move is from the "XEROX" in red letters to this new one.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonny]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 7:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[wow, another classic logo dies - just like the recent UPS and at&t (all lowercase now, right?) "updating" of their logos. Glad IBM is still sticking to its guns. why would you spend decades building up your brand identity and then swap it for something that looks like it represents a taiwanese upstart? foolish. i can't wait for everything to be NOT shiny balls again.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Graham H.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 8:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Long live Big Blue's brand identity. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[thomashayes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 10:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[is it me or does that logo remind you of the new playstaiton network logo or the xbox 360 logo and so on...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Einlander]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2009 9:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[I like that font, but the orb makes it seem like an Antivirus company..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 9:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[truly, pixels have gone out of fashion.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ethan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 8:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[The "Digital X" in the background of this post's image was retired previously ... but it should have stuck around. If anything, I think their new logo should be updated lettering, which they got, beneath or alongside the iconic X.<br><br>What a waste of money ... but could have been worse (London 2012, anyone?).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 10:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm getting sick of every logo being either a sphere or an oval.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ZeroCorpse]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 10:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[That is interesting that it is compared to the new at&t brandmark.  Our company (Interbrand) designed that one too.  It is a non-issue that it reminds you of the sony ericsson brandmark, or the 360 brandmark for that matter, since they are two different categories.  But it does have the "tech" feel, which is a good thing for xerox.  The old one did feel dated.  Every new logo that comes out gets dinged by people.  Look at the reaction to the new at&t logo <a href="http://www.underconsideration.com/speakup/archives/002478.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.underconsideration.com/speakup/archives/002478.html</a><br><br><br>One thing to consider though, as I have seen all the concepts of both the at&t logo and the xerox logos that were presented to clients, is that the client will pick what they like, and have you tweak it, combine it with another concept, and tweak it some more.  It is just the way the industry is set up.  Not much you can do about it.  Personally, I think there were better options for both brandmarks, but I'm just a designer, not the client.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymous]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 11:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[If "anonymous" is an interbrand employee I don't think that this is the forum to complain about the client being the problem for not picking the logo that you thought was the best. As a designer who has designed more than a few identity programs I know how difficult it is to come up with a fresh new effective logo. It's easy to follow a trend or be derivative of other logos. Maybe there were breakthrough logos that were presented and didn't get picked. Save them for the next company, but don't bite the hand that feeds- just suck it up and cash the check.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2008 9:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Bryan,<br><br>Point noted.  Although, it really wasn't complaining as much as trying to explain the state of client-agency relationships.  That logo received a fair amount of internal criticism as well.  But, in the end, the updated look is what we (Xerox and Interbrand) both felt would help move Xerox in a better direction.  We signed off on it and it is officially part of our body of work.<br><br>Cheers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymous]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2008 10:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Anonymous<br><br>Ok, so maybe complaining was a little harsh. <br><br>I have a couple questions though. Is it the responsibility of the branding agency to make sure that the new branding is unique, relevant and memorable in the marketplace and move the client to this end- remembering that the client is leaning on your expertise and research? Should there be a limit to how many 3D orb logos populate the landscape? Once a trend is in full swing isn't it time to regroup and not bother to present any orb concepts? <br><br>Thanks,<br>Bryan]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 12th 2008 12:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Bryan,<br><br>Good question.  I would say that an agency will always want to present a range of executions to the client.  A lot of times the client comes in with a brief wanting a complete brand overhaul, and ends up just wanting a brand refresh/update.  You would be surprised at how many times the client themselves really don't know what they want, they just want to see options (not saying this is the case with xerox, just talking in general terms).  <br><br>It is obvious that a mark like this would come out of workshops and sketch sessions.  It is expected.  I was not involved with the creation of this mark, but I am pretty sure that we did consumer testing of the marks, and usually that kind of data is hard to argue.  If you were to pick average Joe off the street and present various marks to them and ask "Which one of these says technology and stability?"  It is pretty clear to see why this mark would rise to the top.  I would imagine that a brand like this, with all the money behind it, will be coming out with new media ads (tv, web, etc.) and this mark will most likely shine when it is animated (look at at&t, that mark looks great when animated).<br><br>Personally, I am sick of the 3D orb look.  I always try to create marks that stand the test of time, that will last 20 years or longer.  Unless of course the brand has a short shelf life, and requires a treatment based on trends (take men's body sprays and deodorants for example)<br><br>Hope that answers your questions.<br><br>Cheers.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymous]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 12th 2008 1:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's funny. I got on the comments page to comment that I didn't think their old logo looked that bad. Looks like about 36 people beat me to it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Nonamiss]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2008 2:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm kinda pissed off about the new logo. I work for Xerox and after the logo first started to appear on our internal web applications, I made a bet with a co worker that Xerox would not adopt the new logo as their global branding. <br><br>I'm pissed cause I lost but I'm also pissed because it's not the most responsible thing to do when you're still trying to regain a reasonable share price and channel the right resources to combat the ever increasing competitive threat. So maybe Xerox paid out their first dividend in like a decade (albeit a very small one), that doesn't mean they should drop serious money on phasing out one of the most recognized and known logos in the business world.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Karim Hamasni]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2008 12:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sigh, I wish companies would stop redoing their logos.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[michas_pi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2008 12:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/xerox-retires-40-year-old-logo/</guid><description><![CDATA[How dumb. And sad. That logo was iconic. Why ditch an icon? Unsmart, Xerox.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[murray]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2008 1:43PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
