http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/08/lacie-324-24-inch-10-bit-lcd-for-the-pros/ Engadget Comments for LaCie 324 24-inch 10 bit LCD for the pros http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/08/lacie-324-24-inch-10-bit-lcd-for-the-pros/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/08/lacie-324-24-inch-10-bit-lcd-for-the-pros/
That would make the resolution 1728x1080. That's very nonstandard.]]>Jan 8th 2008 11:08AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/08/lacie-324-24-inch-10-bit-lcd-for-the-pros/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/08/lacie-324-24-inch-10-bit-lcd-for-the-pros/
1080p/16:9 = 1920x1080


you'd see 1920x60px bars above and below a 1080p movie.. unless of course you use a media player that can stretch to full.. vlc, wmpc, etc...]]>Jan 8th 2008 11:15AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/08/lacie-324-24-inch-10-bit-lcd-for-the-pros/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/08/lacie-324-24-inch-10-bit-lcd-for-the-pros/Jan 8th 2008 11:21AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/08/lacie-324-24-inch-10-bit-lcd-for-the-pros/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/08/lacie-324-24-inch-10-bit-lcd-for-the-pros/Jan 8th 2008 11:29AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/08/lacie-324-24-inch-10-bit-lcd-for-the-pros/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/08/lacie-324-24-inch-10-bit-lcd-for-the-pros/
Right, and there's nothing about this monitor that contradicts that. It'll display 1080 horizontal lines progressively scanned just fine.

The fact that it will do *more* if you feed the right data to it doesn't mean it won't do *less* too. It is a 1080p display. They're telling you it'll play 1080p content natively, which it will.

There is no such resolution as "1200p". 1080p is a defined standard. Once you go above that, you just start talking in resolutions again. This is a 1920x1200 monitor that's 1080p capable.

Not that hard to understand. Apple, Dell et. al have been making monitors like this for years. (Just not 10 bit, which is awesome.)
]]>Jan 8th 2008 11:43AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/08/lacie-324-24-inch-10-bit-lcd-for-the-pros/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/08/lacie-324-24-inch-10-bit-lcd-for-the-pros/Jan 8th 2008 11:46AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/08/lacie-324-24-inch-10-bit-lcd-for-the-pros/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/08/lacie-324-24-inch-10-bit-lcd-for-the-pros/Jan 8th 2008 12:13PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/08/lacie-324-24-inch-10-bit-lcd-for-the-pros/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/08/lacie-324-24-inch-10-bit-lcd-for-the-pros/Jan 8th 2008 11:59AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/08/lacie-324-24-inch-10-bit-lcd-for-the-pros/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/08/lacie-324-24-inch-10-bit-lcd-for-the-pros/
So why is this $1050? Three extra ports cost $700? LOL! And why "$1050" instead of $1000? what's that $50 for? is that the "so it doesn't look like we just arbitrarily picked our price" surcharge?]]>Jan 8th 2008 1:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/08/lacie-324-24-inch-10-bit-lcd-for-the-pros/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/08/lacie-324-24-inch-10-bit-lcd-for-the-pros/Jan 8th 2008 2:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/08/lacie-324-24-inch-10-bit-lcd-for-the-pros/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/08/lacie-324-24-inch-10-bit-lcd-for-the-pros/Jan 8th 2008 2:45PM