<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for No joke: Qualcomm's Snapdragon prototypes don't use Snapdragon</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/10/no-joke-qualcomms-snapdragon-prototypes-dont-use-snapdragon/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for No joke: Qualcomm's Snapdragon prototypes don't use Snapdragon</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on No joke: Qualcomm's Snapdragon prototypes don't use Snapdragon]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/10/no-joke-qualcomms-snapdragon-prototypes-dont-use-snapdragon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/10/no-joke-qualcomms-snapdragon-prototypes-dont-use-snapdragon/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks like an iphone patent filing, with a keyboard underneath.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Grimsbo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 10th 2008 11:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on No joke: Qualcomm's Snapdragon prototypes don't use Snapdragon]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/10/no-joke-qualcomms-snapdragon-prototypes-dont-use-snapdragon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/10/no-joke-qualcomms-snapdragon-prototypes-dont-use-snapdragon/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ouch... This article will make someone cringe as it seems they read at least their products up on engadget and care about the publicity it puts out. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Reader]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 10th 2008 11:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on No joke: Qualcomm's Snapdragon prototypes don't use Snapdragon]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/10/no-joke-qualcomms-snapdragon-prototypes-dont-use-snapdragon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/10/no-joke-qualcomms-snapdragon-prototypes-dont-use-snapdragon/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sounds like another potential lawsuit for Qualcomm.... =P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Oswin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2008 12:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on No joke: Qualcomm's Snapdragon prototypes don't use Snapdragon]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/10/no-joke-qualcomms-snapdragon-prototypes-dont-use-snapdragon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/10/no-joke-qualcomms-snapdragon-prototypes-dont-use-snapdragon/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's why I sold my Qualcomm stock. They don't know their hat from their balls.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[granny down east]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2008 12:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on No joke: Qualcomm's Snapdragon prototypes don't use Snapdragon]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/10/no-joke-qualcomms-snapdragon-prototypes-dont-use-snapdragon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/10/no-joke-qualcomms-snapdragon-prototypes-dont-use-snapdragon/</guid><description><![CDATA[Re: "beg the question." Please learn the correct usage of this phrase. It does not mean what you think it means.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[crotchety old man]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2008 7:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on No joke: Qualcomm's Snapdragon prototypes don't use Snapdragon]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/10/no-joke-qualcomms-snapdragon-prototypes-dont-use-snapdragon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/10/no-joke-qualcomms-snapdragon-prototypes-dont-use-snapdragon/</guid><description><![CDATA[Welcome to the modern era where traditional meanings aren't necessarily the only meanings.<br>"begs a question" easily means something as simple as <br>"raises the question" besides its definitions dealing with logical fallacies.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eddie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2008 11:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on No joke: Qualcomm's Snapdragon prototypes don't use Snapdragon]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/10/no-joke-qualcomms-snapdragon-prototypes-dont-use-snapdragon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/10/no-joke-qualcomms-snapdragon-prototypes-dont-use-snapdragon/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow. Just wow.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MasterCKO]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2008 3:28PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>