<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Trans-Pacific Express submarine cable system gets FCC approval</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Trans-Pacific Express submarine cable system gets FCC approval</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trans-Pacific Express submarine cable system gets FCC approval]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</guid><description><![CDATA[Am I the only one who, when first reading the headline, thought there was going to be not a submarine cable system, but a cable system for SUBMARINES?<br><br>Now THAT'S the way to travel.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2008 9:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trans-Pacific Express submarine cable system gets FCC approval]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nope, I thought the same =\]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2008 10:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trans-Pacific Express submarine cable system gets FCC approval]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cool... Does it come in pieces?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rafer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2008 9:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trans-Pacific Express submarine cable system gets FCC approval]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</guid><description><![CDATA[Those cables are crazy.<br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submarine_communications_cable" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submarine_communications_cable</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[agarfield2004]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2008 10:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trans-Pacific Express submarine cable system gets FCC approval]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</guid><description><![CDATA[1.28 Tb per second? That's like 16.384 Gigabytes per second!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ARealOG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2008 10:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trans-Pacific Express submarine cable system gets FCC approval]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</guid><description><![CDATA[Fail. For god sakes use a calculator. 163.8 Gigabytes/sec]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Winter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2008 5:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trans-Pacific Express submarine cable system gets FCC approval]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</guid><description><![CDATA[Excuse me, Sir.  Could you spare some spare bandwidth?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CaliforniaKid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2008 10:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trans-Pacific Express submarine cable system gets FCC approval]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</guid><description><![CDATA[Now that's a terrorist attack waiting to happen...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2008 11:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trans-Pacific Express submarine cable system gets FCC approval]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</guid><description><![CDATA[eh. good luck. get under the ocean, dig up the cable, use some massive underwater saw to cut the cable. and in a few days they'll have it fixed. in the meantime they'll have to route the calls somewhere else. bloody tragedy, it takes an extra 4 seconds to make your international call, im sure the terrorists have won.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MARSHAK]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 12th 2008 1:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trans-Pacific Express submarine cable system gets FCC approval]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</guid><description><![CDATA[All hail the new tube!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Cox]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2008 11:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trans-Pacific Express submarine cable system gets FCC approval]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</guid><description><![CDATA[Verizon still can't get fiber in my neighborhood and it isn't at the bottom of the ocean... Somehow I think they should be focusing on rolling out more fiber above sea level...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2008 11:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trans-Pacific Express submarine cable system gets FCC approval]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh yeah. Getting ~20mbps of bandwidth to your house is far more important than getting 1,280,000mbps of bandwidth ready to serve hundreds of millions of people across the world. Good call.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cromas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2008 1:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trans-Pacific Express submarine cable system gets FCC approval]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</guid><description><![CDATA[...If they broke, don't you think that everything around it would get shocked..?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bradwjensen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2008 11:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trans-Pacific Express submarine cable system gets FCC approval]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</guid><description><![CDATA[No.  Its fiber.  There is no electrical current passing through fiber optic cable.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shane]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 12th 2008 12:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trans-Pacific Express submarine cable system gets FCC approval]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually there will be electrical wires in the cable to power the repeaters because the light can only go so far so you need to repeat it down the length, I was reading on another site about some mob who made a 5TB optical fibre connection from sweden to another country and that was they're major draw back the repeaters for it.<br><br>Again this was a few years ago so it's open to improvement like all things.<br><br>The electrical wires won't kill anything around the area because it's salt water essentially It will just make alot of Hydrogen, Oxygen, Chlorine and a few other gases from electrolisis and eventually the cable will become too corroded to be a problem.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 18th 2008 11:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trans-Pacific Express submarine cable system gets FCC approval]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</guid><description><![CDATA[John, it's impractical to run the high voltages that would be required to make the power go that far though...esepcially in salt water, lol.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tekdemon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 12th 2008 2:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trans-Pacific Express submarine cable system gets FCC approval]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</guid><description><![CDATA[Fail. fiber optic... ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Winter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2008 5:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trans-Pacific Express submarine cable system gets FCC approval]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</guid><description><![CDATA[John is right.<br><br>There will be 12kv power feed equipment on either end to power the undersea erbium doped optical amplifiers (repeaters).  <br><br>The optical fibers are in the middle of the cable, and are surrounded by teflon, a copper conductor, and it is further armored with steel when it approaches land.  <br><br>If there is a cable cut or break, it would simply ground to the ocean bed, creating a shunt fault.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[brp1264]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2008 2:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trans-Pacific Express submarine cable system gets FCC approval]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</guid><description><![CDATA[Look out for Megaladon.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Endies]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2008 11:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trans-Pacific Express submarine cable system gets FCC approval]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</guid><description><![CDATA[yeah Oregon!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 12th 2008 1:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trans-Pacific Express submarine cable system gets FCC approval]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is good news, This will mean a far better link to Australia and the southern Asian countries and places like New Zealand and such.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 12th 2008 1:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trans-Pacific Express submarine cable system gets FCC approval]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why do telcos still insists on measuring capacity by number of phone calls?  Those days are over ...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ck]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 12th 2008 2:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trans-Pacific Express submarine cable system gets FCC approval]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</guid><description><![CDATA[Did anyone else read the head line and thought it was going to be about something totally different? I read it and got confused because I thought it was going to be about cable for submarines. Which mean, I think it must be time for bed; it is 3:00 am now.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Garst]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 12th 2008 4:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trans-Pacific Express submarine cable system gets FCC approval]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</guid><description><![CDATA[Great, thats 62 million simultaneous emails advertising a pork bun recipe. By the way it is: a) Print out b)fold into a ball c)enjoy with some soy sauce.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 12th 2008 6:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trans-Pacific Express submarine cable system gets FCC approval]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</guid><description><![CDATA[I watched a Documentary.. of when the U.S use to have Some Subs. Tap Lines.. of the coast of Russia.. <br>i think this will only make it easy-er for Foreign Country to hack in to are System?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jimmy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 12th 2008 8:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trans-Pacific Express submarine cable system gets FCC approval]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</guid><description><![CDATA[learn how to spell and use proper grammar. sorry, but GOD DAMN ITS ANNOYING. "are".. it's "our" !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Winter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2008 5:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trans-Pacific Express submarine cable system gets FCC approval]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/trans-pacific-express-submarine-cable-system-gets-fcc-approval/</guid><description><![CDATA[Adding my voice to the masses, the cable is NOT for submarines. Perhaps the proper use here is sub-marine or submerged marine cable. It is clear that bloggers and others, attempting to characterize themselves as writers, could benefit from a closer reading of their posts (at a minimum) or consider employing an editor, to clean up the ambiguities.<br><br>Engadget does a better job than most at ensuring the work of the "writers" is clear, concise, and readable.<br><br>This story made me laugh - and I appreciate that!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dlheritage]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 14th 2008 9:20AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
