http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/ Engadget Comments for BenQ's emaciated 8 megapixel DSC X800: just barely three-dimensional http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/小弟搜尋搜尋...
市面上雖擁有近拍功能的相機廠牌真多@@
但,看來BenQ這台是市面上"最薄"又擁有近拍拍的...國產之光啦!!
而且結合了同三星功能可以播放MP3.MP4功能,真是炫又吸引人ㄉ,看的出BenQ的用心!!
再來看外表,鏡頭雖在左手角,但依小弟多年play相機,應不成問題(因為都早習慣備小角架,到處趴趴走應付不同地形拍攝,拍攝時都左手捉角架腳,右手按快門...),獨特外型及流線性的設計也讓我心動很多多,當然最喜歡就是在可近拍又超薄的設計理念...推推推啦!!
經過這次小弟在市面上尋訪中,很能感受現在BenQ在相機上的努力,不論到大賣場或燦坤.全國.各大通路,真的到處可以看到我們這個台灣之光的耕耘,無形中也在這近相機平平低迷同時,BenQ還願用心做出產品...真值的鼓勵與支持,內心是粉感動!!
Ok!!個人推薦這型相機,也不知BenQ何時上市ㄌㄟ@^.^@]]>Jan 24th 2008 7:39PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/Jan 29th 2008 10:17PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/Jan 14th 2008 6:47PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/Jan 14th 2008 6:57PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/Jan 14th 2008 7:15PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/Jan 14th 2008 7:31PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/Jan 14th 2008 7:45PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/Jan 15th 2008 12:59AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/Jan 15th 2008 2:30AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/
But optics are expensive, and so are larger sensors. Making the pixels smaller and cramming more of them into each piece of silicon is a cheap and its easy to trick gullible consumers that more megapixels are better.

]]>Jan 15th 2008 9:02AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/Jan 14th 2008 7:17PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/If you're getting a smaller point-and-shoot, AT LEAST get the canon A-series.]]>Jan 14th 2008 7:45PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/
So why do small cameras "suxx" Mr.LOLboy?

When you're in a suit such a camera fits nicely into your jacket pocket. I find having a bulge on my belt while wearing a suit to be "teh fails lolz!!11!" ]]>Jan 14th 2008 8:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/Even a canon a5xx or a7xx isn't that big, unless you are wearing tight pants o.O]]>Jan 14th 2008 8:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/
Even those are "big" compared to those benq camera's. They cater to a different audience, and that one is pretty big I'd guess. So it makes business sense to keep manufacturing these things, and leave the dslr market to the traditional players.

Hinke]]>Jan 15th 2008 2:22AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/Jan 15th 2008 1:29AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/You incorrectly refer to the camera as a "DSC X800." However, the picture clearly shows that the camera is a "DC X800." For a digital camera maker to name a camera "DSC..." would certainly draw Sony's ire.]]>Jan 15th 2008 2:46AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/benqs-emaciated-8-megapixel-dsc-x800-just-barely-three-dimensi/總覺得不出 3x 光學變焦手機是件陰謀...
]]>Jan 17th 2008 11:32AM