<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Multicore memory in the works?</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/multicore-memory-in-the-works/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Multicore memory in the works?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Multicore memory in the works?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/multicore-memory-in-the-works/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/multicore-memory-in-the-works/</guid><description><![CDATA[i remember reading something like this in "nanotech for dummies"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Boywithhair]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 16th 2008 7:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Multicore memory in the works?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/multicore-memory-in-the-works/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/multicore-memory-in-the-works/</guid><description><![CDATA[Durrr but then all our ram will be too big to fit in our computers durrr.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bipedal]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 16th 2008 7:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Multicore memory in the works?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/multicore-memory-in-the-works/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/multicore-memory-in-the-works/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hey, Carnegie Mellon is less than an hour from where I live...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Wanker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 16th 2008 7:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Multicore memory in the works?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/multicore-memory-in-the-works/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/multicore-memory-in-the-works/</guid><description><![CDATA[I could walk there from where I am right now... OOooooo!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[qwho]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 16th 2008 8:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Multicore memory in the works?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/multicore-memory-in-the-works/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/multicore-memory-in-the-works/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well then you're famous. Give yourself a pat on the back :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[johnnychipface]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 16th 2008 8:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Multicore memory in the works?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/multicore-memory-in-the-works/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/multicore-memory-in-the-works/</guid><description><![CDATA[i'll just say it...awesome.  memory needs this, the potential is amazing.  make this non-destructive, and hello disk-less drives!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EMoShunz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 16th 2008 9:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Multicore memory in the works?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/multicore-memory-in-the-works/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/multicore-memory-in-the-works/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sign me up!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 16th 2008 9:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Multicore memory in the works?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/multicore-memory-in-the-works/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/multicore-memory-in-the-works/</guid><description><![CDATA[I worked with multicore memory 25 years ago. Punch cards too. ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sporkinum]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 16th 2008 9:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Multicore memory in the works?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/multicore-memory-in-the-works/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/multicore-memory-in-the-works/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hmm, can we wait for software developers to utilize multicore processors first? It seems that the hardware is now ahead of software developers and I really don't see software catching up because every day new more advandced hardware is released. <br><br>But I would still love to have more memory, Vista and iTunes together take up like 4Gigs on their own.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric M.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 16th 2008 9:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Multicore memory in the works?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/multicore-memory-in-the-works/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/multicore-memory-in-the-works/</guid><description><![CDATA[what on earth are you talking about?<br>programmers don't have anything to do with memory in ram apart from the actual address spaces. HOW the hardware aranges that space is irrelevant to a programmer.<br><br>it's like if you were putting data into houses. how the house is built and what performance it has is irrelevant to you, as the "address" stays the same.<br><br>so the programmer and the end user get the benefit of transparent tech. all good and we all win.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[p3ngwin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 16th 2008 11:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Multicore memory in the works?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/multicore-memory-in-the-works/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/multicore-memory-in-the-works/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think you're 100% right. Even the lowliest, slimiest, cheapest budget Dell is overpowered for the casual user in many ways. I think software is the real key component for 2008.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chebwa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 16th 2008 2:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Multicore memory in the works?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/multicore-memory-in-the-works/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/multicore-memory-in-the-works/</guid><description><![CDATA[They should call it Ashram. Or maybe not.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 16th 2008 10:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Multicore memory in the works?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/multicore-memory-in-the-works/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/multicore-memory-in-the-works/</guid><description><![CDATA[Doubling the size... Doubles the Speed.....<br><br>So Computers will now start to take up half our rooms again?<br><br>Cuz if that really works.. I will take my whole living room to fit that bad boy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 16th 2008 5:07PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
