<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for GE lets loose seven new digital cameras for Europe</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/22/ge-lets-loose-seven-new-digital-cameras-for-europe/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for GE lets loose seven new digital cameras for Europe</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on GE lets loose seven new digital cameras for Europe]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/22/ge-lets-loose-seven-new-digital-cameras-for-europe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/22/ge-lets-loose-seven-new-digital-cameras-for-europe/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wish GE would quit diluting their brand name by licensing it to various companies.  This camera is not made by GE.  They just use the GE brand name.  Just like how various alarm clocks, cordless phones, etc are marketed.  <br><br>GE only makes certain home appliances (refrigerator, water treatment systems, washer, dryer, dish washer, trash compactor, and certain microwaves).  They also make light bulbs, nuclear power plants, medical equipment like X-ray, CT scanners, ultrasounds, MRI, etc.  They also own NBC/Universal (most of it anyway).  They also make diesel locomotives, jet engines, industrial systems, insurance companies, etc.  Just look up ge.com and look at their portfolio.  Cameras, and clock radios don't figure in their business.<br><br>However it is their fault to keep on licensing their logo to people.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Siva]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 22nd 2008 4:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on GE lets loose seven new digital cameras for Europe]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/22/ge-lets-loose-seven-new-digital-cameras-for-europe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/22/ge-lets-loose-seven-new-digital-cameras-for-europe/</guid><description><![CDATA[I saw Westinghouse televisions at best buy. I don't want those either. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bobbyw]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 22nd 2008 11:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on GE lets loose seven new digital cameras for Europe]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/22/ge-lets-loose-seven-new-digital-cameras-for-europe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/22/ge-lets-loose-seven-new-digital-cameras-for-europe/</guid><description><![CDATA[that camera looks like the sony dsc t200<br><br>with the small knob there as well..<br><br>huh  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[huh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 22nd 2008 4:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on GE lets loose seven new digital cameras for Europe]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/22/ge-lets-loose-seven-new-digital-cameras-for-europe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/22/ge-lets-loose-seven-new-digital-cameras-for-europe/</guid><description><![CDATA[I saw one of their magnificent products at Sears. Not a dishwasher. It was next to some Olympus and Sony products and the tag on it said "Digital Camera". No megapixels or anything. $89.99<br><br>I laughed and bought a Canon.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stevo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 22nd 2008 5:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on GE lets loose seven new digital cameras for Europe]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/22/ge-lets-loose-seven-new-digital-cameras-for-europe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/22/ge-lets-loose-seven-new-digital-cameras-for-europe/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well I bet it hasn't been taken with you or your family standing in front of it, if that's important to you. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Reader]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 22nd 2008 6:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on GE lets loose seven new digital cameras for Europe]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/22/ge-lets-loose-seven-new-digital-cameras-for-europe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/22/ge-lets-loose-seven-new-digital-cameras-for-europe/</guid><description><![CDATA[Simple compositing job?<br>Time to whip out $700 duopoly reinforcement software!<br><br>~GIMP user.  (some of the time I try to type that, I accidentally type the PIMP..  I love colemak. ;)  Maybe it would be better marketing to just rename it the Professional Image Manipulation Program when they add native support for CMYK or HDR or whatever.  Might as well, right?  I mean, instead of saying 'photoshop this image', we could just say 'PIMP it'.  Telling people to GIMP images confuses them.<br><br>That's it.  I'm just going to start calling it that; no turning back.  PIMP that image, baby!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ethana2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2008 12:42AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>