<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Samsung's i80, i100, and S1060 trio of novel cameras</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/25/samsungs-i80-i100-and-s1060-trio-of-novel-cameras/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Samsung's i80, i100, and S1060 trio of novel cameras</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's i80, i100, and S1060 trio of novel cameras]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/25/samsungs-i80-i100-and-s1060-trio-of-novel-cameras/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/25/samsungs-i80-i100-and-s1060-trio-of-novel-cameras/</guid><description><![CDATA[WHAT? You were able to combine 3 cameras no one cares about into 1 post instead of 3.  Crazyness]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 25th 2008 7:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's i80, i100, and S1060 trio of novel cameras]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/25/samsungs-i80-i100-and-s1060-trio-of-novel-cameras/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/25/samsungs-i80-i100-and-s1060-trio-of-novel-cameras/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's interesting how samsung cameras are so ignored and dismissed, from the very few tests and sample shots made by people I saw I don't think they are that bad at all.<br>And oddly enough they are available in every damn shop here, and I mean every, albeit only 2 (cheap) models and not their whole lineup.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 25th 2008 8:25AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>