<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for NEC intros 17-, 19-, and 22-inch LCD monitors</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/28/nec-intros-17-19-and-22-inch-lcd-monitors/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for NEC intros 17-, 19-, and 22-inch LCD monitors</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC intros 17-, 19-, and 22-inch LCD monitors]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/28/nec-intros-17-19-and-22-inch-lcd-monitors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/28/nec-intros-17-19-and-22-inch-lcd-monitors/</guid><description><![CDATA[A sign of the times - when this technology is considered Ho-Hum<br><br>Just a while ago, Geeks would have been ooohing and ahwwing over this.<br><br>What will it take?  What will it take??<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[STUD HUNK]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2008 9:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC intros 17-, 19-, and 22-inch LCD monitors]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/28/nec-intros-17-19-and-22-inch-lcd-monitors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/28/nec-intros-17-19-and-22-inch-lcd-monitors/</guid><description><![CDATA[Honestly... the 19" got "stuck with?" How close to the thing are you sitting, Engadget!?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chebwa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2008 9:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC intros 17-, 19-, and 22-inch LCD monitors]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/28/nec-intros-17-19-and-22-inch-lcd-monitors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/28/nec-intros-17-19-and-22-inch-lcd-monitors/</guid><description><![CDATA[1,440 x 900 and 1,680 x 1,050 is a pretty substantial difference.<br>By my (maybe wrong) calculation thats 36000 pixels of real estate.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jtc970]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2008 10:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC intros 17-, 19-, and 22-inch LCD monitors]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/28/nec-intros-17-19-and-22-inch-lcd-monitors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/28/nec-intros-17-19-and-22-inch-lcd-monitors/</guid><description><![CDATA[Myself, I'm seeing more like 468,000 pixels difference (but I could be off as well).  Personally, I'd be much more interested in seeing some new offerings in the 24" size.  My FHD2400 is so close to perfect, but not quite there.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[THL]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2008 10:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC intros 17-, 19-, and 22-inch LCD monitors]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/28/nec-intros-17-19-and-22-inch-lcd-monitors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/28/nec-intros-17-19-and-22-inch-lcd-monitors/</guid><description><![CDATA[yawn.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[aardvark sandwich]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2008 10:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC intros 17-, 19-, and 22-inch LCD monitors]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/28/nec-intros-17-19-and-22-inch-lcd-monitors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/28/nec-intros-17-19-and-22-inch-lcd-monitors/</guid><description><![CDATA[maybe if there was a 24" in there.. it would be newsworthy]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[efm-7]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2008 10:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC intros 17-, 19-, and 22-inch LCD monitors]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/28/nec-intros-17-19-and-22-inch-lcd-monitors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/28/nec-intros-17-19-and-22-inch-lcd-monitors/</guid><description><![CDATA[yawn...time to fill my coffee mug]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[silverblackvoid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2008 10:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC intros 17-, 19-, and 22-inch LCD monitors]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/28/nec-intros-17-19-and-22-inch-lcd-monitors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/28/nec-intros-17-19-and-22-inch-lcd-monitors/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why are people still making 17" LCDs?  I have a 20" widescreen and I couldn't imagine less.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2008 10:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC intros 17-, 19-, and 22-inch LCD monitors]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/28/nec-intros-17-19-and-22-inch-lcd-monitors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/28/nec-intros-17-19-and-22-inch-lcd-monitors/</guid><description><![CDATA[pva panels?!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[deadpool]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2008 11:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC intros 17-, 19-, and 22-inch LCD monitors]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/28/nec-intros-17-19-and-22-inch-lcd-monitors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/28/nec-intros-17-19-and-22-inch-lcd-monitors/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, I got horny when I read "176-degree viewing angles". Is it 8-bit, is the question. Well, I would have splooged if it said 178 degree viewing angles. It's so lame SIPS screens are so pricey now. The cheapest you can get are Apple's Cinema Displays, and those are too pricey for me.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Transrotor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2008 4:36PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>