<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Mustek DV300T digital camera looks like a cellphone, isn't</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/31/mustek-dv300t-digital-camera-looks-like-a-cellphone-isnt/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Mustek DV300T digital camera looks like a cellphone, isn't</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Mustek DV300T digital camera looks like a cellphone, isn't]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/31/mustek-dv300t-digital-camera-looks-like-a-cellphone-isnt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/31/mustek-dv300t-digital-camera-looks-like-a-cellphone-isnt/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes, but it's designed to be ONE HANDED! Why are most (if not all) other camera's still two handed as if we had to hold them up and look through a view-finder. This is one the most glaring leftovers from old design on the market. I would love a good ONE HANDED camera. (I know you can use cameras today with one hand, but they are not designed that way).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Green]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 31st 2008 4:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Mustek DV300T digital camera looks like a cellphone, isn't]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/31/mustek-dv300t-digital-camera-looks-like-a-cellphone-isnt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/31/mustek-dv300t-digital-camera-looks-like-a-cellphone-isnt/</guid><description><![CDATA[I like the design, pity about the 3.1Mp tho, and who would bother watching films/reading books on the tiny lame ass screen? FAILURE]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cypressmac]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 31st 2008 4:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Mustek DV300T digital camera looks like a cellphone, isn't]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/31/mustek-dv300t-digital-camera-looks-like-a-cellphone-isnt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/31/mustek-dv300t-digital-camera-looks-like-a-cellphone-isnt/</guid><description><![CDATA[If this is for middle income countries' market like India etc. it makes sense. Maybe they should have made it kid oriented .. for kids into music and taking pictures whose parents can't afford cellphones for them may find it useful. That is, if it costs under $20.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Johan S]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 31st 2008 4:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Mustek DV300T digital camera looks like a cellphone, isn't]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/31/mustek-dv300t-digital-camera-looks-like-a-cellphone-isnt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/31/mustek-dv300t-digital-camera-looks-like-a-cellphone-isnt/</guid><description><![CDATA[i wonder if it's cdma or gsm<br><br>oh wait nvm]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2008 6:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Mustek DV300T digital camera looks like a cellphone, isn't]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/31/mustek-dv300t-digital-camera-looks-like-a-cellphone-isnt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/31/mustek-dv300t-digital-camera-looks-like-a-cellphone-isnt/</guid><description><![CDATA[first woot]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jahi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 31st 2008 5:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Mustek DV300T digital camera looks like a cellphone, isn't]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/31/mustek-dv300t-digital-camera-looks-like-a-cellphone-isnt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/31/mustek-dv300t-digital-camera-looks-like-a-cellphone-isnt/</guid><description><![CDATA[This camera must be for Samuel L. Jackson, because anyone going around taking pictures of Spider-man in action has got to be one bad MF!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kevjohn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 31st 2008 5:51PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>