<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Kodak introduces "world's first" 1.4 micron, 5-megapixel CMOS sensor</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Kodak introduces "world's first" 1.4 micron, 5-megapixel CMOS sensor</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak introduces "world's first" 1.4 micron, 5-megapixel CMOS sensor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</guid><description><![CDATA[so at the cost of color resolution...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mariel Lohninger]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2008 12:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak introduces "world's first" 1.4 micron, 5-megapixel CMOS sensor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't think they should talk too much about ISO 3200 in such a small sensor. It WILL look like  giant ball of fuzz. In picture form.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Liam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2008 12:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak introduces "world's first" 1.4 micron, 5-megapixel CMOS sensor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's CMOS though not CCD, and it's improved hopefully.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2008 5:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak introduces "world's first" 1.4 micron, 5-megapixel CMOS sensor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well CMOS is normally worse than equivalent CCD sensors so I don't think that noise is really going to be improved.<br><br>And what about the lack DOF on these new sensors? Photos are going to look even more flat, dull, and too-in-focus than ever before.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shaliron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2008 6:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak introduces "world's first" 1.4 micron, 5-megapixel CMOS sensor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hope that ugly quality Kodak logo jpg is up there for irony reasons, otherwise someone needs some Photoshop lessons ... badly.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2008 12:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak introduces "world's first" 1.4 micron, 5-megapixel CMOS sensor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</guid><description><![CDATA[The sensor sounds nice, but don't you need some quality glass in front of it to get a worthwhile image?  Something better than "fixed focus"? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[scotjo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2008 12:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak introduces "world's first" 1.4 micron, 5-megapixel CMOS sensor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</guid><description><![CDATA[Speaking of which, Kodak has a new logo, in case you weren't aware:<br><br><a href="http://www.kodak.com/global/en/corp/historyOfKodak/evolutionBrandLogo.jhtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.kodak.com/global/en/corp/historyOfKodak/evolutionBrandLogo.jhtml</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[yelohbird]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2008 12:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak introduces "world's first" 1.4 micron, 5-megapixel CMOS sensor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</guid><description><![CDATA[oh yeah, and it's a real looker, too.  both kodak's logo and cameras were better in 1907.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[m]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2008 12:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak introduces "world's first" 1.4 micron, 5-megapixel CMOS sensor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'd really like to see low-grain high ISO sensors start making their way into mobile devices... maybe make them worth using in any condition other than direct sunlight. <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2008 12:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak introduces "world's first" 1.4 micron, 5-megapixel CMOS sensor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</guid><description><![CDATA[This sounds good. I hope it has a very high dynamic range.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Johan S]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2008 12:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak introduces "world's first" 1.4 micron, 5-megapixel CMOS sensor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</guid><description><![CDATA[Gee, and here I was hoping the whole camera phone thing would go away.  Damn, guess we're stuck with people making shitty pics from their phones.<br><br>@sctojo, better than fixed focus?????  Umm, hate to tell you buddy there is optically nothing better than fixed focus.  If there's something better someone should probably let all those medium and large format guys who have been using silly primes all these years trying to get the best quality out of their giant negatives that there is something to be that fixed focal length piece of junk.  Lol.  Okok, so was your point really asking for a nicer fixed focal length?  That I can hear you on, no dinky plastic lenses.  Comission Leica to make a line of mini-m lens (fixed focal length of course!!! :-D Sorry I do love my primes, don't own one zoom in my collection!) or actually hire a dedicated optical engineer... ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2008 12:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak introduces "world's first" 1.4 micron, 5-megapixel CMOS sensor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sounds like you're confusing some basic photography terms.  Fixed focus lenses tend to be crap.  With an inability to focus, the design and implementation of the lens limits you to the depth of field that the lens is set to, usually a couple of feet to infinity.  You see these fixed focus lenses in disposable cameras and basic camera phones.  Adjustable focus and autofocusing lenses tend to be of better quality and nearly all of them allow you to adjust your depth of field too. <br><br>On the other hand, fixed focal length lenses can be quite good.  Though you lose the ability to go from a wide angle shot to a telephoto one with the same lens, you usually more than make up for it in glass quality and weight savings.  <br><br>99.99999% of all fixed focus, fixed focal length lenses are crap.  99.99999% of all autofocusing fixed focal length lenses aren't crap.  In case that wasn't clear, though you used the term interchangably, fixed focus isn't the same as fixed focal length.<br><br>scotjo was right in wanting something better than a "fixed focus" lens in camera phones.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2008 1:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak introduces "world's first" 1.4 micron, 5-megapixel CMOS sensor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</guid><description><![CDATA[i believe sctojo means a focus free lens (fixed focal point), not focal length (prime vs zoom). ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dexter fillmore]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2008 1:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak introduces "world's first" 1.4 micron, 5-megapixel CMOS sensor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</guid><description><![CDATA[@OC: DoF is aperture dependent, not focal point.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dexter fillmore]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2008 1:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak introduces "world's first" 1.4 micron, 5-megapixel CMOS sensor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</guid><description><![CDATA[@OC, HAHAHAHA, you are right good sir, I read fixed focal length, stupid lack of sleep inserting words that weren't there.  My bad dudes.<br><br>I'm still hoping the whole crappy camera phase just goes away though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2008 2:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak introduces "world's first" 1.4 micron, 5-megapixel CMOS sensor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</guid><description><![CDATA[i'd rather have a crappy phone in my camera than the opposite.  all this will do is add cost.  but if we must have camera phones (and there's little other choice), i wish they'd work harder on improving storage and especially transfer before cramming more megapixels behind still-crappy lenses.  most people i know lose all of their pictures whenever they get a new phone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[m]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2008 12:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak introduces "world's first" 1.4 micron, 5-megapixel CMOS sensor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</guid><description><![CDATA[The 720p standard at 30 fps .. for motion or sports isn't better than having it interlaced but at 60 fps -- which appears as smooth motion to the eye. Obviously 720p at 60fps would have been the ideal. Anyway, I hope they may have a 60 or 120 fps mode at an even lower resolution.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Johan S]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2008 1:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak introduces "world's first" 1.4 micron, 5-megapixel CMOS sensor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</guid><description><![CDATA[your point was clearer this time.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dexter fillmore]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2008 2:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak introduces "world's first" 1.4 micron, 5-megapixel CMOS sensor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes, but for fixed focus lenses to work properly, the depth of field needs to be defined so the hyperfocal distance can be calculated and the focus set to that distance.  This necessitates a fixed aperture size, typically to a high f-stop.  While you're of course correct to point out that DOF is aperture dependent, I didn't say otherwise.  I did imply that you won't find fixed focus lenses with adjustable apertures in consumer products, and that lack of an aperture setting is another shortcoming with fixed focus lenses.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2008 2:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak introduces "world's first" 1.4 micron, 5-megapixel CMOS sensor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sure is a lot of sniveling going on here.  I'm glad there's progress being made.  Someday my "good" phone will have a "good' camera and the planets will align... karma.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PowerCell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2008 2:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak introduces "world's first" 1.4 micron, 5-megapixel CMOS sensor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/kodak-introduces-worlds-first-1-4-micron-5-megapixel-cmos-se/</guid><description><![CDATA[My problem with Kodak's video support (I own two Kodak digicams that can do 720p HD), is that the frame rate is not constant. It's never 30.00 (or even better, NTSC's 29.97), it just fluctuating and gives a hard time to my video editor.<br><br>Also, they record in MPEG4-SP, while at least MPEG4-ASP or h.264 would be more desirable.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eugenia Loli-Queru]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2008 3:51PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
