<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Panasonic shows off a pair of pro-level HD camcorders</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/14/panasonic-shows-off-a-pair-of-pro-level-hd-camcorders/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Panasonic shows off a pair of pro-level HD camcorders</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic shows off a pair of pro-level HD camcorders]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/14/panasonic-shows-off-a-pair-of-pro-level-hd-camcorders/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/14/panasonic-shows-off-a-pair-of-pro-level-hd-camcorders/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks like a good camera. But it's annoying that Panasonic is currently being all coy about this camera's bit rate: it's more than 13 Mbps, but probably less than 20 Mbps. Does anyone know the actual bit rate or has this been classified as a state secret?...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LondonConsultant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 14th 2008 2:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic shows off a pair of pro-level HD camcorders]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/14/panasonic-shows-off-a-pair-of-pro-level-hd-camcorders/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/14/panasonic-shows-off-a-pair-of-pro-level-hd-camcorders/</guid><description><![CDATA[i likey. me havey please.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Will H.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 14th 2008 2:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic shows off a pair of pro-level HD camcorders]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/14/panasonic-shows-off-a-pair-of-pro-level-hd-camcorders/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/14/panasonic-shows-off-a-pair-of-pro-level-hd-camcorders/</guid><description><![CDATA[Now what do I do with my brand new DVX-100B I brought a month ago????]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iggy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 14th 2008 2:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic shows off a pair of pro-level HD camcorders]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/14/panasonic-shows-off-a-pair-of-pro-level-hd-camcorders/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/14/panasonic-shows-off-a-pair-of-pro-level-hd-camcorders/</guid><description><![CDATA[Send it to me?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darkest Daze]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 14th 2008 2:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic shows off a pair of pro-level HD camcorders]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/14/panasonic-shows-off-a-pair-of-pro-level-hd-camcorders/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/14/panasonic-shows-off-a-pair-of-pro-level-hd-camcorders/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you live in America, it seems that now the best thing to do is sue Panasonic for having the audacity to update a product shortly after you purchased it!  How dare Appl...I mean, Panasonic do that!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dustin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 14th 2008 2:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic shows off a pair of pro-level HD camcorders]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/14/panasonic-shows-off-a-pair-of-pro-level-hd-camcorders/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/14/panasonic-shows-off-a-pair-of-pro-level-hd-camcorders/</guid><description><![CDATA[why did you buy a 100B?<br>unless it was for your home video's <br>SD is on the way out. Even HDV is starting to look dated]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[aesthetical]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 15th 2008 7:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic shows off a pair of pro-level HD camcorders]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/14/panasonic-shows-off-a-pair-of-pro-level-hd-camcorders/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/14/panasonic-shows-off-a-pair-of-pro-level-hd-camcorders/</guid><description><![CDATA[just a small correction "DVX100 / DVX200" theres no such thing as a dvx200 it would be hvx200. but 1080p/60 for a prosumer camera sounds amazing. wonder how sony/canon will respond]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 14th 2008 2:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic shows off a pair of pro-level HD camcorders]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/14/panasonic-shows-off-a-pair-of-pro-level-hd-camcorders/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/14/panasonic-shows-off-a-pair-of-pro-level-hd-camcorders/</guid><description><![CDATA[Maybe the TV studios will start switching all of their shows to HD (1080 or 720) now.  Any flavor of HD is better than SD (640x480, not the SD memory storage).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rcappo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 14th 2008 3:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic shows off a pair of pro-level HD camcorders]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/14/panasonic-shows-off-a-pair-of-pro-level-hd-camcorders/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/14/panasonic-shows-off-a-pair-of-pro-level-hd-camcorders/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cameras are only one part of the equation, rcappo...<br><br>Unfortunately there is a LOT of other infrastructure in a broadcast facility that needs to be updated in order to support HD.  Most of my local stations are only passing the network programming in HD (if they have a DTV signal on the air at all yet).  Local programming still looks like crap from most of them.<br><br>Even though the FCC has mandated a switch to DTV over the air by 2009, they have not mandated that local broadcasters actually provide an HD signal...In other words, you may wind up with a DTV signal that is still just the same old crappy 480i material (maybe upconverted to 720p or 1080i if you're lucky...).<br><br>The good news is that the new DTV equipment is inherently capable of HD in most cases...It's just going to take quite some time before some broadcasters upgrade entirely to an HD signal path.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shane]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 14th 2008 3:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic shows off a pair of pro-level HD camcorders]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/14/panasonic-shows-off-a-pair-of-pro-level-hd-camcorders/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/14/panasonic-shows-off-a-pair-of-pro-level-hd-camcorders/</guid><description><![CDATA[I am really happy these things are becoming so prevalent. Viva la HD!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JAson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 14th 2008 3:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic shows off a pair of pro-level HD camcorders]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/14/panasonic-shows-off-a-pair-of-pro-level-hd-camcorders/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/14/panasonic-shows-off-a-pair-of-pro-level-hd-camcorders/</guid><description><![CDATA[grammar nazi sez: '...a optically stabilized...' can not has gramrz.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shmengie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 14th 2008 3:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic shows off a pair of pro-level HD camcorders]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/14/panasonic-shows-off-a-pair-of-pro-level-hd-camcorders/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/14/panasonic-shows-off-a-pair-of-pro-level-hd-camcorders/</guid><description><![CDATA[Come on, drop this pixel shifting crap and give us a true 1080p sensor, and a nice large one at that in one of these bodies with HDD/P2 card/SDHC card support... Less than $3k too. :)<br><br>We really need a "digital rebel" of the HD camera world.<br><br>You either buy a crappy consumer cam or a crappy prosumer cam... That's right, both are crappy for the price compared to how good the $8k+ cameras are.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 14th 2008 8:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic shows off a pair of pro-level HD camcorders]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/14/panasonic-shows-off-a-pair-of-pro-level-hd-camcorders/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/14/panasonic-shows-off-a-pair-of-pro-level-hd-camcorders/</guid><description><![CDATA[We actually have a P2/MiniDV variant of this exact camera at the TV station I work for. It's very handy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Wallace]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 14th 2008 9:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic shows off a pair of pro-level HD camcorders]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/14/panasonic-shows-off-a-pair-of-pro-level-hd-camcorders/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/14/panasonic-shows-off-a-pair-of-pro-level-hd-camcorders/</guid><description><![CDATA[AVCHD sucks.  Dont believe me?<br><br><a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=998" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=998</a><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jnoel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 15th 2008 1:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic shows off a pair of pro-level HD camcorders]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/14/panasonic-shows-off-a-pair-of-pro-level-hd-camcorders/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/14/panasonic-shows-off-a-pair-of-pro-level-hd-camcorders/</guid><description><![CDATA[Digicams would be a new foray for me: it's either an affordable and revamped canon HV20 to play with or, if really a ground breaker get the scarlet. After selling my eye balls obviously. It has to provide a performance edge]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph A Borg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 1:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic shows off a pair of pro-level HD camcorders]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/14/panasonic-shows-off-a-pair-of-pro-level-hd-camcorders/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/14/panasonic-shows-off-a-pair-of-pro-level-hd-camcorders/</guid><description><![CDATA[You asshats! it'll cost the same as a sony EX1, but instead of having 35mps full bandwith HD, it's going with the .H264 compression system, which isn't superior in any way, shape or form. Its lense and the AVCHD codec are both inferior to the other prosumer HD cameras out there. The only potential thing this camera has as a leg up on the HVX-200 or EX1 is that SD chips are so cheap, because they're antiquated technology. AVCHD is consumer grade technology. bottom line. it's great for your $1000 Sony palmcam for filming home movies. If you're going to bother to drop $6000 on a camera, get a HVX or EX1. now, if this thing costs $4000, it'll be a contender. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 6th 2008 1:14PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>