<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for KITT's scanner light gets explained</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for KITT's scanner light gets explained</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on KITT's scanner light gets explained]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm disappointed that Will Arnett isn't the voice of KITT as was rumoured.<br>"Michael..."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Will]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 15th 2008 6:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on KITT's scanner light gets explained]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</guid><description><![CDATA[Will Arnett has done to many sexually questionable characters (30 rock, blades of furry, etc) to not imagine those characters when hearing his voice. Val Kilmer (batman movies) has at least a little more coolness to it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Timmy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 15th 2008 8:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on KITT's scanner light gets explained]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think the producers of Knight Rider may have made a terrible mistake...<br><br>Also, I'm not sure that anyone who wore a Schumacher Batsuit is physically capable of adding coolness to anything (Look at Nipples, Michael!)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan S.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 15th 2008 11:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on KITT's scanner light gets explained]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</guid><description><![CDATA[Will Arnett couldn't be the voice of KITT because it's a Ford, and he has a contract with GM.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 15th 2008 1:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on KITT's scanner light gets explained]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</guid><description><![CDATA[Haha Dan...<br>"You're as cold as ice... willing to sacrifice"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Will]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 15th 2008 11:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on KITT's scanner light gets explained]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</guid><description><![CDATA[I thought the movement was faster...  This looks so slow in the videos.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andir3.0]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 15th 2008 6:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on KITT's scanner light gets explained]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree. That's 1 slow heart beat. I wonder what the other version looked like.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellianth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 15th 2008 7:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on KITT's scanner light gets explained]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</guid><description><![CDATA[I am suprised that they made one more accesory fit onto that seriously tricked out mustang.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 15th 2008 8:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on KITT's scanner light gets explained]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</guid><description><![CDATA[If they put LED lights in every fake scoop on a Mustang, it would kill the battery instantly.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Reid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 15th 2008 7:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on KITT's scanner light gets explained]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</guid><description><![CDATA[Reid, you're dead wrong.  RED LEDs draw very little current.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MBN]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 15th 2008 11:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on KITT's scanner light gets explained]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</guid><description><![CDATA[There must be shortage of articles this morning.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chipsdeluxe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 15th 2008 9:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on KITT's scanner light gets explained]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</guid><description><![CDATA[So if it's supposed to resemble a heartbeat will it be going faster during the intense scenes?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Travis Molleck]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 15th 2008 10:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on KITT's scanner light gets explained]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't mind Will Arnett's voice. Even with the questionable characters. <br><br>And, another thing...it didn't make the sound that the original scanner made while it was idle. <br><br>I'm banning it til further notice.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gorillamonk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 15th 2008 11:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on KITT's scanner light gets explained]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</guid><description><![CDATA[wonder why they just didnt time it with the RPM's]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 15th 2008 1:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on KITT's scanner light gets explained]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</guid><description><![CDATA[The converging/diverging scanner looks lame.  I'd have been happier had they stuck with Glen Larson's original "cylon" scanner that was made of out **gasp** 1970s tech.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan S.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 15th 2008 11:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on KITT's scanner light gets explained]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</guid><description><![CDATA[KITT is supposed to be a GM vehicle. This is an abomination. The new KITT should have been a GTO.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Prokanda]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 15th 2008 11:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on KITT's scanner light gets explained]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</guid><description><![CDATA[Still shouldn't have used a ford... Now its only going to make the current Rustang owners (*cough* V6 owners) think they have an even faster car than they already do. Very disappointed in GM and Mopar for not offering up the Camaro or Challenger... Would have made for a much better KITT.<br><br>Just my .02 ...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bethel03]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 15th 2008 11:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on KITT's scanner light gets explained]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was going to give the show a chance until they replaced Will Arnett.  Now that he's gone all we'll have left to focus on is how the show is a poor imitation of an '80s classic...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[stuckouteast]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 15th 2008 1:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on KITT's scanner light gets explained]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thank You. Thank you for typing "at the read link" instead of "after the break" to emphasize a "read link"...One engadget member seems to have gained some "non-fad" filled knowledge. Everytime I read the words "after the break" I'm wondering "who's taking a break?". I guess folks with dial-up can take a break after clicking the link while waiting for it to load?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Deeds]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 15th 2008 2:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on KITT's scanner light gets explained]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thank you for posting this blog about my article.  I really appreciate the exposure.  I'm glad you liked it!<br><br>Chris<br><a href="http://www.musclecarblog.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.musclecarblog.com/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 15th 2008 6:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on KITT's scanner light gets explained]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</guid><description><![CDATA[Has the cylon invasion commenced? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bbiessel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2008 1:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on KITT's scanner light gets explained]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/kitts-scanner-light-gets-explained/</guid><description><![CDATA[It looks very complicated, cool, red, etc etc... But I just can not see the heartbeat in it and remembering the original night rider? This one is not even half as good... And I so miss the wuw wuuuw sound it used to make :D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[frankie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 5:27AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
