<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA["Endgame" anyone?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 7:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[The end is F**king Nigh!!!! Lol. 28 Days Later anyone?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jherez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 8:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[The Singularity is Near!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[philos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 8:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[All this prediction stuff is pretty disturbing, i just read a bunch of articles on wiki. I hold some of them with a grain of salt, I'll start believing in the singularity and such if we get past 2012]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jherez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 9:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[As dumb as this upcoming generation appears to be, this achievement wouldn't take much effort.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Smart People Play Tuba]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 9:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[sweet, landscaping will no longer have a language barrier]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 10:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[:)<br><br>Remember the old predictions the scientists use to say on how the world will work in the year 2000? As you can see we have exceeded their predictions by miles, except for the space traveling part. So, I predict that machines will match man even much earlier than they expect, maybe around the 2018 or 2020.<br><br>What say you guys?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Saad Rabia]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 7:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[they thought in the year 2000 that we would be driving hover cars and we would have colonies on neptune...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CUBSWILLWIN]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 7:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[No, because they were also way off on predictions like flying cars and pill sized meals. If any thing I Wouldn't expect this until 2038]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[B]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 7:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[neptune is a gaseous planet...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JohnTitor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 7:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ CUBSWILLWIN & @ B:<br><br>Maybe it is the other way around! Maybe, the right way to put it is that we will see machines matching man way after 2029, like 2060! What you guys said is more accurate and leads to the fact that scientists predict stuff way ahead of the realistic time frame. :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Saad Rabia]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 8:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ johnTitor<br>Uranus is too :P<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CUBSWILLWIN]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 8:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[IT seems like most short-term future predictions made are wrong in exact ideas such as a 1920 prediction of colonizing the others planets, but are somwhat "right" with the level of advancement even if they don't necessarily know what exactly it will be. I hope that sort of makes sense. I'm thinking of people from the late 19th century or early 20th century having made wrong predictions about say, colonizing the planets or having viable personal flying transportation...BUT they couldn't even imagine the advancements we made in electronics and computer technology. I mean they literally couldn't even CONCEIVE of or conceptualize the technology that now is such a large part of modern society.<br><br>I have read some of Kurzweil's awesome books, and I agree to some extent with his ideas of robotic artifical intelligence, however I believe that 50 or 75 years from now, the world will be different in ways that we cannot of imagine. I think it's so interesting to look back at famous philosophers and thinkers from classical Greek antiquity up to the renaissance and try to imagine how they saw the world and the future and compare that to what we have today. It really gives you profound insight when trying to understand our own future and what lies ahead. I truly hope that the positive parts of globalization can spread like wildfire allowing average people to experience different cultures and become friends with people from all different parts of the world. It's starting to happen with the internet and increased global travel. I hope the human potential/spirituality movement gains momentum and people really focus on relieving human suffering and creating peace with one another. I know the cynics will call it a pipe dream and that humans always are at war with each other, etc etc, but I believe as many do that times will change for the better, whether a catastrophic natural event or nuclear apocaclypse has to initiate it or not(2012!).  This outcome would be better than just having future technology with the same human drama, but technology advancement may actually precipitate better human relations and functioning, especially tech which can help all of human kind life a life with all of their basic needs met. Also I look to space travel and the discovery of other life as potential events that could bring together the world once again.<br>enough of the novel.... lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Winter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 9:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks like my toaster won't just burn toast anymore! :P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CUBSWILLWIN]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 7:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[LOL At your previous comment, thank you for the laugh]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jherez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 9:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[>>Looks like my toaster won't just burn toast anymore! <br><br>No, it will still burn toast, but it will be doing it because it hates you.<br><br>Rob]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Boscorooty]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 9:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[LOL @ Rob!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MangaMan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 18th 2008 5:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[no comments about welcoming our machine overlords yet? weird....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SimbaDogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 7:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[I for one don't welcome our i-robot-wannabe humanoids. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Homeboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 7:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[Darn. we have to wait that long!?!?!? sucks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[George B. Romero]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 7:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[Seriously. I want to become a professional couch potato already. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Reader]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 8:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's not going to happen don't worry. Realistically, it would be stupids to make true AIs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Abuzar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 22nd 2008 12:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think Kurzweil is an idiot.  He seemingly makes a living talking about when artificial intelligence can make even better artificial intelligence, and about how we're going to need to make sure AI won't take over.  Whereas we all know, once that happens, we're toast.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dennis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 7:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hello? Cloud City? Lando?  I think that's where the carbon freezing chamber is too...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 18th 2008 4:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[Someone's been watching too many Sarah Connor chronicles ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adoniteking]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 7:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks like somebody @ 'teh beeb' finally got around to reading The Age of Spiritual Machines... 9 years late. Here are some links if after reading the article you're left asking "where's the beef":<br><br><a href="http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/</a><br><br><a href="http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/cms/7124/7262.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/cms/7124/7262.aspx</a><br><br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Kurzweil#2029" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Kurzweil#2029</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ALLurGroceries]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 7:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[Kurzweil actually made this claim quite a while ago, which is (sort of) indicated in the article when he says he has "made the case" for this being true.<br><br><a href="http://www.kurzweilai.net/articles/art0691.html?m=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.kurzweilai.net/articles/art0691.html?m=1</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 7:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[yea.. i wouldnt be too keen to step into a ring with a robot.<br><br>but i'd definitely take it on out in a jungle or somewhere i can set traps and outsmart it..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Oliveri]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 7:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[Judging by your other comments,<br>the robot would outsmart you everywhere.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Will]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 18th 2008 12:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[The article on the BBC had more appropriate pictures :P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Intrepid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 7:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[true. but we know engadget to have a slightly quirky angle on life. i actually think theirs is better. its also from their own collection, from CES this year!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mac]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 10:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[". . . it's going down by or before 2029 . . ."<br><br>Don't "by 2029" and "befor 2029" mean the same thing?<br><br>I'm just sayin'.<br><br>Much Love,<br>Grammar Boy<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Smart People Play Tuba]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 7:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't think this will ever happen, the people who know how to even make a robot like that will be smart enough not to make it too powerful, right? Its like they've never seen Terminator.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 7:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[The Mayans may prove right if this all comes down on Dec 21, 2021.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mojo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 18th 2008 3:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[Edit: its not live they've never seen terminator<br><br>(When is engadget gonna get a comment edit system)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 7:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is quite old news actually.  I knew about 2029 since I was 11, six years ago.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Worrel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 7:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually, thanks to your comment, the researchers have set the bar a bit lower on the par "human" intelligence level. They are now targeting 2010.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dustin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 9:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[Was that supposed to be sarcastic?  lol didn't get it.<br><br>By the way, IA (Intelligence Amplification) is an interesting topic I'll have to look into.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Worrel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 18th 2008 12:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, I'm gonna start watching that Terminator show and brush up on my robot killing skills.  They might come in handy...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 7:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA["Apparently, machines "will have both the hardware and the software to achieve human level artificial intelligence" by then,"<br><br>I'm pretty sure machines have more intelligence than some people already. <br><br>Like Ms. South Carolina:<br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj3iNxZ8Dww" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj3iNxZ8Dww</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Killer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 7:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA["I believe" is a concept we should teach robots. They'll be far less harmful on the catwalk.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BigD145]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 8:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[iron man 28 fx?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 8:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, we're boned...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael LaFramboise]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 8:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[;)<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 8:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[If AI does become this advanced I'm curious as to what education will be like. Instead of learning algebra and grammar we may solely be trained to be creative and think only in ideals. Even with the intelligence of a human it's quite unlikely that computers would be able to be as creative as humans.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Reader]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 8:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[Interestingly enough, thinking "only in ideas" as a goal of education means that a sizable percentage of the human population will be valuable only as a food source once occupations like digging ditches and making my iced chai latte are adequately performed entirely by machines.<br><br>It's a good thing that computers would be able to take over our math and science at that point, because "ideas" are a dime a dozen already when not backed by a knowledge of how to make them reality.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 11:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[Definitely.  we don't even understand how creativity works; no program is capable of producing a dream or a subconsious.  machines are a long way off from ethics and morals and 'gut' feelings.  we can't makes machines like us because we don't understand what makes us tick.  human intelligence is relative; current computers have a mathematical intelligence well above ours, but as seen by rules based voice recognition (yes, you vista) it sucks.  I think we're at least 50 years away from anything with half the IQ of a human, let alone a terminator or toy soldiers takeover.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rotaryfan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 22nd 2008 11:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah machines will match humans in that they both will have no autonomy and will be run by chips, yay?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 8:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes, it's called the "singularity" and Vernor Vinge predicted it many years ago.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Higgins]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 8:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/kurzweil-predicts-that-machines-will-match-man-by-2029-bring/</guid><description><![CDATA[ok yeah but when are they starting to time travel, I mean they should have come back allready no?<br><br>the fact that we haven't seen any of them maybe because:<br>1.- we defeated their metallic asses and they never got to travel back in time to destroy us<br>2.- they waited to be so advanced before time travel that they look exactly like us and thus we haven't noticed (I know a couple o' trolls that could be robots)<br>3.- we finally became friends after long eons of fighting and there wasn't any real need to travel back in time cuz we will have "VTT (Virtual Time Travel) that would enable us to "live" in any time frame we would so desire.<br>4.- And lastly but not litlish they never got to time travel cuz we blew them up (earth and all) just before they could and just before we got the remaining of us in one of those old spaceships and embarked in the fruitless search for home in Europa (and later a new solar system)<br><br><br><br>sorry got little carried away  <br><br>      ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[webon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2008 8:38PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>