<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Intel branding Montevina platform Centrino 2?</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Intel branding Montevina platform Centrino 2?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel branding Montevina platform Centrino 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[I do like the chart, but could someone please translate the left column for me?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Yossarian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 18th 2008 2:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel branding Montevina platform Centrino 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, deduction is a nice trick.<br>If the tables on the right don't ring a bell, the table on the left won't clear up much...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dralion76]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 18th 2008 2:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel branding Montevina platform Centrino 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[80% or so made sense, just thought I might be able to learn a thing or two.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Yossarian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 18th 2008 2:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel branding Montevina platform Centrino 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hope you are kidding about the translation. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 18th 2008 10:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel branding Montevina platform Centrino 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, I had no idea WiMax was headed for mainstream. Also, I was pretty sure that the new 45nm penyrn chips (like the T9300, T9500) had an FSB of 800MHz. It seems pretty legit, but for whatever reason, I'm sketched.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gremlin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 18th 2008 2:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel branding Montevina platform Centrino 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[On second thought, it seems the T9300 and T9500 are part of Santa Rosa, so I guess it all makes sense. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gremlin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 18th 2008 2:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel branding Montevina platform Centrino 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[1)  designation<br>2) generation of centrino<br>3) date released<br>4) marketed name<br>5) core name<br>6) die size<br>7) physical processing cores<br>8) L2 cache<br>9) 64bit <br>10) chipset<br>11) RAM support<br>12) integrated graphics<br>13) integrated audio<br>14) Wireless hardware<br>15) wireless support]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rwfu666]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 18th 2008 2:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel branding Montevina platform Centrino 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Much appreciated. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Yossarian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 18th 2008 2:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel branding Montevina platform Centrino 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nicely deduced, and largely correct. But actually:<br><br>1) Platform generation<br>2) Platform branding<br>3) Release date<br>4) Processor family<br>5) Processor codename<br>6) Manufacturing process<br>7) No. of cores<br>8) L2 Cache size<br>9) 64-bit support<br>10) Highest FSB speed<br>11) Chipset group<br>12) Highest memory speed supported<br>13) Graphics core<br>14) Sound<br>15) Wireless connection group<br>16) Wireless connection specification<br><br>Not that you're wrong, but since Yossarian wants to learn a thing or two, this is as closely translated as I can get it...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kureshii]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 18th 2008 8:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel branding Montevina platform Centrino 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[oops between 9 and 10 should be supported FSB]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rwfu666]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 18th 2008 2:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel branding Montevina platform Centrino 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[The WiMax support is LAME-O.  There's only one major carrier even supporting that crap and it's not lookin' too good for them either.  Plus even if they do make it, the coverage is gonna SUCK.  They didn't even support 3G chips as part of the platform like they were supposed to.  They need to do that first before they move on to 4G (or pre-4G as the case may be).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CB17]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 18th 2008 2:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel branding Montevina platform Centrino 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nice logo mockup...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicko]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 18th 2008 8:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel branding Montevina platform Centrino 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[No rumor!<br>Intel's Montevina will carry a new Centrino 2 branding in hopes of clearing up any confusing amongst consumers. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[creditos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 18th 2008 3:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel branding Montevina platform Centrino 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Banias, surely?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dunqn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 19th 2008 12:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel branding Montevina platform Centrino 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Damnit, and I just got finished upgrading all of my laptops to the supposedly-new "Centrino vPro inside" stickers.  <br><br>Ugh, words cannot describe the frustration!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lein]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 18th 2008 6:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel branding Montevina platform Centrino 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[if it's any consolation, Intel is releasing their 6th generation Centrino platform (dubbed Calpella) in early 2009 that ditches the old FSB for a much faster QuickPath connection.<br><br>i feel you though.  i need to buy a laptop for college next year, but i don't want to go  in with Montevina and have it be so outdated within 3 or 4 months.  not only is ditching FSB a big move, but Intel is also supposed to release a set of processors dubbed Nehalem that use a completely new core architecture (they will be marketed as Core 3).<br><br>ugh is right.  sometimes it feels like technologys advancing /too/ fast.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[maveric101]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 18th 2008 8:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel branding Montevina platform Centrino 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[ummmm I don't read Asian... dang it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 18th 2008 6:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel branding Montevina platform Centrino 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[hmmm.... Asian...??!?!! asian =/= language !]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[doobster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 18th 2008 9:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel branding Montevina platform Centrino 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[...it's supposed to be a joke.  while it may not be that funny, you don't need to rank him down for it.  it's not insulting.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[maveric101]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 18th 2008 8:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel branding Montevina platform Centrino 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[I still have no idea what a centrino was anyway... <br>It wasn't the processor... so what, the chipset? who cares??]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[w00t]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 18th 2008 7:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel branding Montevina platform Centrino 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Centrino = Processor + Chipset + Wireless]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 18th 2008 3:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel branding Montevina platform Centrino 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[DDR3 only?... sounds expensive..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Skobbolop]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 18th 2008 8:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel branding Montevina platform Centrino 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Intel's lack of official roadmaps with real release dates is driving me crazy.  I'd love to buy a new q9550 processor this week but I don't know if this is the real release week or not as everyone is just guessing about their release schedule for most chips.   I don't think the vendors who are "selling" the q9550 even no when they are going to be allowed to actually ship these.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[boe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 18th 2008 12:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel branding Montevina platform Centrino 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hear there's also to be Montevina C2D ULV chips to come out which will have 3mb of L2 cache vs 2mb in the previous versions and 800mhz FSB vs 533mhz in the previous ones (eg, U7500, U7600, U7700).<br><br>These ones will be designated SU9300 and SU9400.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kamall]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 18th 2008 10:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel branding Montevina platform Centrino 2?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/18/intel-branding-montevina-platform-centrino-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[WHAT?  Why not the Bi-Core 2 Duo? For the ultimate in the duplicity of confusion.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chris fredette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 18th 2008 10:51AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
