http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/ Engadget Comments for Alcatel-Lucent sends data 1600 miles at 16.4Tbps http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/
"This latest test used 164 different channels and updated transmitters and multiplexers to hit the record -- which is fine and all, but guys, if you're NOT using that old school 25.6Tbps gear anymore we know a few people who are interested."

Or am I going crazy?]]>Feb 29th 2008 3:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/
But you're still going crazy.]]>Feb 29th 2008 3:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/Feb 29th 2008 3:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/Feb 29th 2008 4:17PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/Feb 29th 2008 4:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/
]]>Feb 29th 2008 4:23PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/Feb 29th 2008 5:01PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eniac]]>Feb 29th 2008 5:01PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/Feb 29th 2008 5:04PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/Feb 29th 2008 5:07PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/"The researchers used 164 wavelength-division multiplexed channels modulated at 100 Gbps in the effort."
so that would be one optical strand, how many can they fit into a bundle like the undersea cables? ]]>Feb 29th 2008 5:05PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/Just think about it: I could download a whole Blockbuster in a few minutes with cables like that!!

O_O]]>Feb 29th 2008 7:15PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/Feb 29th 2008 9:36PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/Mar 1st 2008 7:29AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/Mar 1st 2008 8:53AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/Mar 1st 2008 5:32PM