<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for ITC upholds ruling, reiterates that Nokia didn't violate Qualcomm patents</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/itc-upholds-ruling-reiterates-that-nokia-didnt-violate-qualcom/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for ITC upholds ruling, reiterates that Nokia didn't violate Qualcomm patents</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ITC upholds ruling, reiterates that Nokia didn't violate Qualcomm patents]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/itc-upholds-ruling-reiterates-that-nokia-didnt-violate-qualcom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/itc-upholds-ruling-reiterates-that-nokia-didnt-violate-qualcom/</guid><description><![CDATA[Um, Netscape navigator news Engadget? NN is shutting don on March 1st]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[brutha-man]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 29th 2008 9:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ITC upholds ruling, reiterates that Nokia didn't violate Qualcomm patents]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/itc-upholds-ruling-reiterates-that-nokia-didnt-violate-qualcom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/itc-upholds-ruling-reiterates-that-nokia-didnt-violate-qualcom/</guid><description><![CDATA[I dream of the day when Engadget issues a death watch on Qualcomm. They're one of the most ethically corrupt companies in the US today.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rich]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 29th 2008 10:12AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>