<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for UK High Court finds invalidity in Qualcomm's patent dispute with Nokia</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/03/uk-high-court-finds-invalidity-in-qualcomms-patent-dispute-with/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for UK High Court finds invalidity in Qualcomm's patent dispute with Nokia</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UK High Court finds invalidity in Qualcomm's patent dispute with Nokia]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/03/uk-high-court-finds-invalidity-in-qualcomms-patent-dispute-with/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/03/uk-high-court-finds-invalidity-in-qualcomms-patent-dispute-with/</guid><description><![CDATA[Qualcomm: 'Innovation' through Litigation]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phanbouy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2008 3:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UK High Court finds invalidity in Qualcomm's patent dispute with Nokia]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/03/uk-high-court-finds-invalidity-in-qualcomms-patent-dispute-with/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/03/uk-high-court-finds-invalidity-in-qualcomms-patent-dispute-with/</guid><description><![CDATA[QUALCOMM needs to learn to STFU.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rock99rock]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2008 3:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UK High Court finds invalidity in Qualcomm's patent dispute with Nokia]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/03/uk-high-court-finds-invalidity-in-qualcomms-patent-dispute-with/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/03/uk-high-court-finds-invalidity-in-qualcomms-patent-dispute-with/</guid><description><![CDATA['amend the patents'?!? What does that mean, reword them to cover other people's creations?<br><br>Qualcomm seem to have got the UK patent system confused with the US one.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2008 4:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UK High Court finds invalidity in Qualcomm's patent dispute with Nokia]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/03/uk-high-court-finds-invalidity-in-qualcomms-patent-dispute-with/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/03/uk-high-court-finds-invalidity-in-qualcomms-patent-dispute-with/</guid><description><![CDATA[I love how the patent system works. Basically, you can patent any idea - it doesn't matter whether the idea is already out there or totally batshit crazy.<br><br>The only time the validity is checked is when a case comes to court, thus costing everyone involved lots of time and money.<br><br>Lawyers 1 - 0 Innovation]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xbit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2008 5:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UK High Court finds invalidity in Qualcomm's patent dispute with Nokia]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/03/uk-high-court-finds-invalidity-in-qualcomms-patent-dispute-with/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/03/uk-high-court-finds-invalidity-in-qualcomms-patent-dispute-with/</guid><description><![CDATA[why oh why didn't i go into patent law?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phanbouy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2008 5:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UK High Court finds invalidity in Qualcomm's patent dispute with Nokia]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/03/uk-high-court-finds-invalidity-in-qualcomms-patent-dispute-with/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/03/uk-high-court-finds-invalidity-in-qualcomms-patent-dispute-with/</guid><description><![CDATA[because you don't want to be lower than scum sucking bottom feeders?<br><br>or you have a conscience you can't put on hold.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[skulldriveshaft]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2008 12:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UK High Court finds invalidity in Qualcomm's patent dispute with Nokia]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/03/uk-high-court-finds-invalidity-in-qualcomms-patent-dispute-with/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/03/uk-high-court-finds-invalidity-in-qualcomms-patent-dispute-with/</guid><description><![CDATA[invalidity is the hotness<br><br>i love seeing that picture, reminds me of batman :]]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[skulldriveshaft]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2008 12:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UK High Court finds invalidity in Qualcomm's patent dispute with Nokia]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/03/uk-high-court-finds-invalidity-in-qualcomms-patent-dispute-with/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/03/uk-high-court-finds-invalidity-in-qualcomms-patent-dispute-with/</guid><description><![CDATA[QUArreLCOMM]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 6th 2008 7:04PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>