<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[suddenly that 15 hour flight to australia i made seems like NOTHIN]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 3:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[that looks like something for a skydiving team to jump off of.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shon S.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 6th 2008 1:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[S.R. Hadden will buy one.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 3:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[+1 for reference to Contact]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hp540]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 4:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Five-year mission to bodly go where no pigeon has gone before]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LondonConsultant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 3:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Did I miss something? What's the point?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 3:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Surveilance/Recon....what do you think the extra 5Kw and 1000lbs is for?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kamokazi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 3:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Semi-permanent wireless transmitters/repeaters with no need for a ground lease or unsightly tower.  In theater (military) communications and/or recon.  Weather/ozone/climate monitoring stations.  <br><br>or, my favorite, sky-writing 'We're No. 1' over and over. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 3:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Couldn't an orbiting satellite do the things you both have described? With the fatal exception of skywriting, of course. :) This seems like creating the space pen instead of using a pencil.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JD]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 5:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@JD: satellites cost a crapload to launch, and can't be brought down for upgrades/repairs. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[murray]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 5:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[so the next time this fails and wants to land in someones back yard, unlike the satellite the other week, we will get 20 mins notice to shoot it down and not 20 days?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[poulan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 6:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[JD - orbiting satellites have much inferior capabilities to aircraft flying at ~100K feet. Think intercepting radio communications, ultra-high resolution imaging, etc etc]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Winter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 6th 2008 1:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[If it could stay up for that long what's keeping it from staying up indefinitely?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ECG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 3:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[The 2nd law of thermodynamics for one.<br><br>Solar panels will degrade (though I'm not sure how fast), the motors will wear down, and you just can't dodge birds and meteors forever.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Travis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 3:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was kind of wondering the same thing...Something to do with the lifetime of the batteries maybe? or simply mechanical failure? *shrugs*]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David W.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 3:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[On that note, where is the Taapon tag?<br><br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yokohama_Kaidashi_Kik%C5%8D" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yokohama_Kaidashi_Kik%C5%8D</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 6th 2008 6:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[As James said, What's the purpose of a UAV at 90 000 feet flying for 5 years? A new kind of satellite?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Maldrien]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 3:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have the obvious application for this... prison.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mrpoo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 4:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Would be useful to the air force I guess. Like a refueling platform that could stay up in the air for long periods of time, sort of like what was in the movie Stealth.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ColonelSmith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 3:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Except they were airships weren't they? Seems kinda sensible for this kinda thing...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Phoenix]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 4:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, except it would run out of fuel to refill with pretty fast. Then you have to get another plane up there to refuel this so it can refuel other planes.<br><br>Seems like a bad idea.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Abuzar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 7:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[refueling platform capable of flight for five years with fuel capacity of < 1,000 lbs? lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Winter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 6th 2008 1:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can you say Google Earth Live]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ssdforums]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 3:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes I can... Gooo-guhl. eeee-aaaarth. Laaaaah-eeeev.<br>There. Done.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KazSur]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 4:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hope theres a movie and a meal on that flight.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OneLove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 3:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[WOW!  Thats some feat!  Such a long flight time is mind boggling.  Even private aircraft need parts inspected/rebuilt after a few hundred hours of flight time.  <br><br>Well maybe not mind boggling, but very hard to obtain.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mikey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 3:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[not if everything is redundant.  Staying up at that altitude is easy on a plane. While there's high winds, there's no clouds or other weather to contend with. Landing is hardest on the frame and takeoff is hard on the engines, being as this won't be doing much of either... A carbon framed aircraft should be fine for that time frame.  That leaves the only things needed to be replacement parts.  If you put multiple engines, and other pieces that can be repaired without landing you'll be just fine.<br><br>Of course they could just build a Dirigible. Those would work for years too, with a lot fewer pieces.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mabhatter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 6:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[When will I be able to order my own flying skyfortress? Imagine living on flying platform and taking a small docked plane to work. I guess would noise would be an issue.. but imagine the view!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[blarvh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 3:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cheaper than a satellite but accomplishes the same thing?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CP]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 4:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Unless they solve the problem of lubricants, something's got to give. It's great in theory, like how mid-air refueling can keep a plane up indefinitely. By indefinitely they mean around 36-72 hours before the oil systems have to be flushed. Now I realize electric motors don't require nearly as much...but they definitely require lube and maintenence.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sully]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 4:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Brushless motors. Think about the motors in your hard drive and the fans in your computer. Make them bigger, run them at a lower RPM, and build them to last, and 5 years is conceivable.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[murray]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 5:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, aren't they building mag-lev wind turbines?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 6th 2008 6:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[....this is my DARPA lopsangh<br><br>ZOOLANDER FTW!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bob sakamano]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 4:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[should we already set aside a missile for this when we lose communication to it and have to blow it up for fear of the toxic fuel and Super AWESOME secrets it probably uses to run]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bob sakamano]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 4:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[They already fly by themselves for up to 3 months at a time I thought.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PhilxBefore]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 5:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, bring the extra batteries for your laptop. That's all I have to say!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul McElligott]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 5:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Simple: nuclear powered aircraft.  <br><br>Both the US and the Soviets developed these during the Cold War.  They would be the airborne equivalents of nuclear submarines, capable of cruising above Europe for months at a time and raining down death on an enemy long after the destruction of your own airfields and missile launch sites.<br><br>Charles Stross explored their use in his horror/alternative-history short story "A Colder War."  In reality, the development of ICBMs made them superfluous.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Patiwat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 5:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would love to skydive out of one of these things!!   :D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[engadgetier]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 6:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[But you know it won't be up there for 5 years straight.  We'll need to tinker with it, so will.  And like everything else, it is, or will become, superfluous.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sirocco]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 6:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nuclear blimps ... F'n A.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JuggleNuts]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 6:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Taken from the link above: "Essentially, the Vulture is an aircraft that operates like a satellite, but is not regulated by orbital mechanics. "It could be positioned over the battle, at 65,000ft versus 260 miles," says Pulliam. Operating as a pseudo-satellite in the stratosphere and not low Earth orbit would provide a 65dB improvement in communications capability, he says, and significantly increase onboard sensor resolution."<br><br>Also, the article says DARPA has barred nuclear energy from consideration.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rawdo9]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 7:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can you build a solar powered Zeppelin? That should do the trick.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bebop]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 7:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[America try to build 5 year plane to spy on enemy.<br><br>Mother Russia solve the problem with air-filled balloon and solar-powered air compressor.<br><br>I mean really guys, come on. Really? A five year plane? Sure, a satellite costs hells of a lot more, but we have satellites going back to the seventies that are still up and running that will take far better pictures (no turbulence to deal with) and don't cost much to maintain. And like I mentioned above, why not just use a zepplin that hovers at the same altitudes and use compressed air as the source of lift? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Allen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 8:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[There is something exciting and inspirational with this story and the project's challenges. Five years, just think what kind of innovation that will yield which will spill into other areas.<br><br>nobosh.com]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mellen Trio]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 9:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA["at least one successful offeror,"<br><br>Offeror?  Really?<br><br>Try "bidder".]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 10:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Didn't NASA have a working version of this concept a few years ago?  It's supposed to be a cheaper alternative to communications satellites, no?  If it starts to fail or is damaged in some way, it can also be landed and repaired. <br><br>Helios is the name: <a href="http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov/gallery/Photo/Helios/HTML/ED03-0152-4.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov/gallery/Photo/Helios/HTML/ED03-0152-4.html</a><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[frankXchange]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 6th 2008 12:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DARPA sets sights on aircraft capable of five-year flight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/darpa-sets-sights-on-aircraft-capable-of-five-year-flight/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hope they have an air miles reward program.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[spaceb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 6th 2008 1:27AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>