<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Pioneer isn't abandoning Kuro plasma, expects same-quality panels from Matsushita</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/08/pioneer-isnt-abandoning-kuro-plasma-expects-same-quality-panel/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Pioneer isn't abandoning Kuro plasma, expects same-quality panels from Matsushita</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pioneer isn't abandoning Kuro plasma, expects same-quality panels from Matsushita]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/08/pioneer-isnt-abandoning-kuro-plasma-expects-same-quality-panel/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/08/pioneer-isnt-abandoning-kuro-plasma-expects-same-quality-panel/</guid><description><![CDATA[Greatest news ever!! Whew... those other reports made it sound like they were exiting the business as a whole. As a KURO owner I have never seen a better HDTV in my life. Keep up the good fight of making a higher class product Pioneer.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Figur]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 8th 2008 1:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pioneer isn't abandoning Kuro plasma, expects same-quality panels from Matsushita]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/08/pioneer-isnt-abandoning-kuro-plasma-expects-same-quality-panel/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/08/pioneer-isnt-abandoning-kuro-plasma-expects-same-quality-panel/</guid><description><![CDATA[this is nice! since Matsushita can now make more panels, maybe the prices will come down a little, no? assuming they can meet supply...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Yubastard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 8th 2008 1:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pioneer isn't abandoning Kuro plasma, expects same-quality panels from Matsushita]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/08/pioneer-isnt-abandoning-kuro-plasma-expects-same-quality-panel/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/08/pioneer-isnt-abandoning-kuro-plasma-expects-same-quality-panel/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is good. Pioneer Kuro Plasma = best TV's ever.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Camperton]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 8th 2008 7:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pioneer isn't abandoning Kuro plasma, expects same-quality panels from Matsushita]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/08/pioneer-isnt-abandoning-kuro-plasma-expects-same-quality-panel/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/08/pioneer-isnt-abandoning-kuro-plasma-expects-same-quality-panel/</guid><description><![CDATA[intresting.... maybe this is the plan pioneer had in mind, if production is moved somewhere else cost will be less and everyone assumes build quality would be worse but thanks to this article build quality and Picture Quality is going to be retain at the same level while being cheaper. This could show a sign for lower cost flat screen in general not just PDP. meanwhile pioneer gets back on their feet analisty thank by 2010 but one years time? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2008 1:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pioneer isn't abandoning Kuro plasma, expects same-quality panels from Matsushita]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/08/pioneer-isnt-abandoning-kuro-plasma-expects-same-quality-panel/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/08/pioneer-isnt-abandoning-kuro-plasma-expects-same-quality-panel/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hmmmm. Although it's a bit of a relief to read this, I'm reminded of another company from years back doing a reformulation of its product much to the chagrin of it's consumers. <br><br>I can see it now: New Kuro being a dissappointment and eventually being replaced by Classic Kuro, which itself is pale shade of Original Kuro.<br><br>It will be interesting to see the first reviews of the "reformulation".<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2008 8:22AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
