<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for IBM's light pulse love affair continues with tiniest nanophotonic switch</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/17/ibms-light-pulse-love-affair-continues-with-tiniest-nanophotoni/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for IBM's light pulse love affair continues with tiniest nanophotonic switch</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM's light pulse love affair continues with tiniest nanophotonic switch]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/17/ibms-light-pulse-love-affair-continues-with-tiniest-nanophotoni/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/17/ibms-light-pulse-love-affair-continues-with-tiniest-nanophotoni/</guid><description><![CDATA[too much geekiness involved.. cant think of anything sensible to comment...<br><br>nanotechnology FTW ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jagannath A]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 17th 2008 9:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM's light pulse love affair continues with tiniest nanophotonic switch]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/17/ibms-light-pulse-love-affair-continues-with-tiniest-nanophotoni/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/17/ibms-light-pulse-love-affair-continues-with-tiniest-nanophotoni/</guid><description><![CDATA[bah, nanotech is morally unacceptable<br><br>they really gotta stop making faster processors<br><br><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/20/two-thirds-of-americans-think-nanotechnology-is-morally-unaccept/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/20/two-thirds-of-americans-think-nanotechnology-is-morally-unaccept/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jared]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 17th 2008 6:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM's light pulse love affair continues with tiniest nanophotonic switch]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/17/ibms-light-pulse-love-affair-continues-with-tiniest-nanophotoni/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/17/ibms-light-pulse-love-affair-continues-with-tiniest-nanophotoni/</guid><description><![CDATA[One day all thier hard work will pay off.  <br><br>Years from now this technology might be in everything we use, or it might not and some other project that they are working on will.  Only working on projects that can be brought to market in the short term is, well, short sighted.  Stretching out there with ambitious projects is what really moves technology forward.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Snowraver1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 17th 2008 7:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM's light pulse love affair continues with tiniest nanophotonic switch]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/17/ibms-light-pulse-love-affair-continues-with-tiniest-nanophotoni/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/17/ibms-light-pulse-love-affair-continues-with-tiniest-nanophotoni/</guid><description><![CDATA[nanotechnology? BLASPHEMY! jesus hates nanotech]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bufsabre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 17th 2008 9:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM's light pulse love affair continues with tiniest nanophotonic switch]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/17/ibms-light-pulse-love-affair-continues-with-tiniest-nanophotoni/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/17/ibms-light-pulse-love-affair-continues-with-tiniest-nanophotoni/</guid><description><![CDATA[Let there be light!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zal]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 17th 2008 9:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM's light pulse love affair continues with tiniest nanophotonic switch]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/17/ibms-light-pulse-love-affair-continues-with-tiniest-nanophotoni/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/17/ibms-light-pulse-love-affair-continues-with-tiniest-nanophotoni/</guid><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.photonics.com/content/news/2008/January/3/90091.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.photonics.com/content/news/2008/January/3/90091.aspx</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee Cairns]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 17th 2008 9:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM's light pulse love affair continues with tiniest nanophotonic switch]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/17/ibms-light-pulse-love-affair-continues-with-tiniest-nanophotoni/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/17/ibms-light-pulse-love-affair-continues-with-tiniest-nanophotoni/</guid><description><![CDATA[jaja he said pingus...<br><br>now, on topic, I think this will see it's light on the cell processor... kinda obvious, right?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Yubastard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 17th 2008 9:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM's light pulse love affair continues with tiniest nanophotonic switch]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/17/ibms-light-pulse-love-affair-continues-with-tiniest-nanophotoni/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/17/ibms-light-pulse-love-affair-continues-with-tiniest-nanophotoni/</guid><description><![CDATA[How about adding that to the PS3 cell processor IBM !]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wisam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 17th 2008 9:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM's light pulse love affair continues with tiniest nanophotonic switch]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/17/ibms-light-pulse-love-affair-continues-with-tiniest-nanophotoni/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/17/ibms-light-pulse-love-affair-continues-with-tiniest-nanophotoni/</guid><description><![CDATA[Man's advent into the world of Quantum Computation!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gaurav Dogra]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 17th 2008 12:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM's light pulse love affair continues with tiniest nanophotonic switch]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/17/ibms-light-pulse-love-affair-continues-with-tiniest-nanophotoni/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/17/ibms-light-pulse-love-affair-continues-with-tiniest-nanophotoni/</guid><description><![CDATA[instead of linking core why not just make photons photons in the cores that way there wont be heat and the speeds wil be faster than silicon. But a man could dream (quantum computing before I am dead please)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Yor1001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 17th 2008 1:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM's light pulse love affair continues with tiniest nanophotonic switch]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/17/ibms-light-pulse-love-affair-continues-with-tiniest-nanophotoni/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/17/ibms-light-pulse-love-affair-continues-with-tiniest-nanophotoni/</guid><description><![CDATA[Light in fibers actually travels slower than electrons in copper wiring, though you could always use air guided Photonic crystals to guide the light. Also PhCs are in their infancy (the light equivalent of the semi conductor) so this is still quite a few years off yet, heck I'm working on a optical switch with a micron scale footprint that is being operated using the thermo optic effect, never mind using anything like a MOSFET.<br><br>Also a all optical computer isn't always a quantum computer, for a quantum computer you would need to be transporting photons at a time and be able to retain the qubits (quantum bits) superposition state at all times within the Qu computer, this would at least need 3-D PhCs for the mere transportation of them. I suppose you could use a slow light high Q cavity for storage, though I couldn't guarantee the retention of coherence while it's being stored. A quantum computer using light in the next 50 years? I doubt it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee Cairns]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 18th 2008 7:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM's light pulse love affair continues with tiniest nanophotonic switch]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/17/ibms-light-pulse-love-affair-continues-with-tiniest-nanophotoni/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/17/ibms-light-pulse-love-affair-continues-with-tiniest-nanophotoni/</guid><description><![CDATA[Now for a limited time only, get a 30 FREE supply of VIAGRA NANO! it will keep your nanophotonic switch ready to go for up to 12 hours... She will love you for it!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Onetruebill]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 17th 2008 3:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM's light pulse love affair continues with tiniest nanophotonic switch]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/17/ibms-light-pulse-love-affair-continues-with-tiniest-nanophotoni/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/17/ibms-light-pulse-love-affair-continues-with-tiniest-nanophotoni/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't know if I'd market "nano" and Viagra in the same context...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andir3.0]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 17th 2008 5:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM's light pulse love affair continues with tiniest nanophotonic switch]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/17/ibms-light-pulse-love-affair-continues-with-tiniest-nanophotoni/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/17/ibms-light-pulse-love-affair-continues-with-tiniest-nanophotoni/</guid><description><![CDATA[Behold the photonic age!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Howdy Doody]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 17th 2008 10:16PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
