<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Stanford researchers cram 12,616 tiny lenses into a 3D camera</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Stanford researchers cram 12,616 tiny lenses into a 3D camera</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Stanford researchers cram 12,616 tiny lenses into a 3D camera]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, this is really quite neat! Can it model NURBS for me? Huh? Please?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 7:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Stanford researchers cram 12,616 tiny lenses into a 3D camera]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[All I want to know is "Will it blend?"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuckles McGee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 7:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Stanford researchers cram 12,616 tiny lenses into a 3D camera]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, I know what "Will it play Doom?" means but I also keep hearing "Will it blend?" can someone explains that to me?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wisam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 10:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Stanford researchers cram 12,616 tiny lenses into a 3D camera]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[Check out www.willitblend.com (not sure if I can put websites here but here we go!)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 11:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Stanford researchers cram 12,616 tiny lenses into a 3D camera]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[FIRST<br><br><br>I for one welcome our doom playing, blending overlords.<br><br>Happy now?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mushrooshi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 20th 2008 1:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Stanford researchers cram 12,616 tiny lenses into a 3D camera]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just imagine ONE DECADE from now - it will probably be a Video Camera]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MissUniverse]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 7:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Stanford researchers cram 12,616 tiny lenses into a 3D camera]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[OK- I read this and immediately thought of the seen in Minority report where he's playing the 3d-ish movies of his kid at the beach on the hologram thing. If it could shoot at a quick enough framerate- this would be able to shoot video just like that- w/ real depth, but from a single POV. Now, to design a reasonable system for playback...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew C]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 20th 2008 1:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Stanford researchers cram 12,616 tiny lenses into a 3D camera]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[i remember when 3mp with one lens was amazing.  now they can do it with 12,616 simultaneously ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[austin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 7:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Stanford researchers cram 12,616 tiny lenses into a 3D camera]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[Focusing this with shaky hands may prove a bit of a problem. Imagine the waiting time needed to focus all those lens.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aguiluz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 7:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Stanford researchers cram 12,616 tiny lenses into a 3D camera]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's what I was thinking haha!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MikeG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 20th 2008 3:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Stanford researchers cram 12,616 tiny lenses into a 3D camera]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[Combine this with a 3 axis inertial sensor and you could generate a point cloud model of a room just by panning the camera around!  Cool implications for high-speed 3D modeling.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mikedman_ak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 7:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Stanford researchers cram 12,616 tiny lenses into a 3D camera]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[With technology like this, you don't even need an inertial sensor to generate a point cloud. With the addition of a 3d depth map, it's very easy to identify points to track the 3d movement of the camera.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 7:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Stanford researchers cram 12,616 tiny lenses into a 3D camera]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[Does anyone have a link showing the output of one of these?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[frank]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 7:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Stanford researchers cram 12,616 tiny lenses into a 3D camera]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[Frank, this sounds like it is based around plenoptic cameras (or integral photography), which have been around for awhile.  If you visit <a href="http://graphics.stanford.edu/papers/lfcamera/" rel="nofollow">http://graphics.stanford.edu/papers/lfcamera/</a>, they have a good video that shows some of the uses of plenoptics circa 2004-2005, such as the "3D" capture, rotating viewpoints, and digital refocusing.<br>So, if plenoptic cameras have been around for so long, why is this one making the news?  According to the press release, it sounds like this is the first time that the imaging, sensor elements, and electronics have been integrated together onto a dedicated chip -- as opposed to modifying a current camera to do the plenoptic thing.<br>You might also check out coded aperture photography as another interesting way of encoding 3D information into a single photograph (<a href="http://groups.csail.mit.edu/graphics/CodedAperture/" rel="nofollow">http://groups.csail.mit.edu/graphics/CodedAperture/</a>, also with cool video), or digital holography as a more quantitative research tool.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Loomis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 20th 2008 1:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Stanford researchers cram 12,616 tiny lenses into a 3D camera]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[What an epic day, first we see that Verizon is going to offer an any device service, and now we've got depth mapping cameras. Bring on the robotics revolution! The next 10 years are going to make the .com boom look quaint.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 7:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Stanford researchers cram 12,616 tiny lenses into a 3D camera]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[Here we go again....starting from....3mp]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Netmagix]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 8:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Stanford researchers cram 12,616 tiny lenses into a 3D camera]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[The Google maps party van should get some of these. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fischju]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 8:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Stanford researchers cram 12,616 tiny lenses into a 3D camera]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA["Once it's ubiquitous, the teams says depth map information can be used to do anything enhance facial recognition systems to improving robot vision..."<br><br>Where do I start on the grammatical problems?  This is why the internet is ruining the english language - when even journalists won't proofread their work.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[eng177]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 24th 2008 11:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Stanford researchers cram 12,616 tiny lenses into a 3D camera]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[Bloggers are considered Journalists these days? Damn this pesky internet and all of it's confusing tubes!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[puxpux]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 9:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Stanford researchers cram 12,616 tiny lenses into a 3D camera]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[ah, i believe that English should be capitalized. as should ...Ass Hat!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[james43062]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 9:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Stanford researchers cram 12,616 tiny lenses into a 3D camera]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[How ironic.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hammond X]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 10:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Stanford researchers cram 12,616 tiny lenses into a 3D camera]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[and without the.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wisam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 10:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Stanford researchers cram 12,616 tiny lenses into a 3D camera]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[The more pixels are shrunk, the less light each pixel will have to process at a given shutter speed.<br><br>The data on surrounding pixels could be aggregated, but the noise per pixel will be very high. Since pixels being digital by nature, low levels of data would be lost unless these pixels are as light sensitive per area compared to how small they are.<br><br>This camera will be very hard to use in low-light, or any movement.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Basel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 20th 2008 4:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Stanford researchers cram 12,616 tiny lenses into a 3D camera]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks like "The Fly" eyes are here. <br>Anyway, how are we going to see the 3d? On a special screen, through glasses or what?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ishism]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 20th 2008 1:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Stanford researchers cram 12,616 tiny lenses into a 3D camera]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[And here is the paper.<br><br><a href="http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4114959" rel="nofollow">http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4114959</a><br>[warning, link requires subscription :) ]]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Atanas Boev]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 20th 2008 4:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Stanford researchers cram 12,616 tiny lenses into a 3D camera]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/stanford-researchers-cram-12-616-tiny-lenses-into-a-3d-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'd love bring a video camera based on this tech into work and film the whole place. Then I'd turn it into a Doom map. Fraggin co-workers (and my boss) FTW!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ebeasley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 20th 2008 9:37AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
