http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/ Engadget Comments for MIT spin-off 1366 Technologies touts better, cheaper solar cells http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/
Proselytizing for nuclear power.

Obligatory denigration of those who disagree as "socialists", "hippies", and climate scientists out to steal their precious bodily fluids.

Rabid defense of industrial/consumption status quo and the miracle of limitless growth on a finite planet.

Rinse/repeat.]]>Mar 27th 2008 5:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/Mar 27th 2008 5:26PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/Mar 27th 2008 5:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/Mar 27th 2008 6:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/
also, yes, coal plants do cost money to build.....and solar ones dont.? :/]]>Mar 29th 2008 3:18AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/
Cost of Building + Cost of running plant over entire life of plant(Coal included) / Total energy generated of entire life of plant


]]>Mar 28th 2008 9:09AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/Mar 27th 2008 5:41PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/
Am I just doing something seriously fucking wrong here?]]>Mar 27th 2008 5:53PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/
Am I just doing something seriously fucking wrong here?]]>Mar 27th 2008 5:53PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/Mar 27th 2008 6:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/
No offense, Engadget, but the posting system is the rough equivalent of a forum from 1995. And yes, I know this isn't supposed to be digg or something (thank god), but it shouldn't be hard to prevent double posting, especially when the enclosed messages are totally identical.]]>Mar 27th 2008 7:57PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/Mar 27th 2008 5:57PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/Mar 27th 2008 6:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/Mar 27th 2008 7:16PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/So the good think about solar energy is that it costs ZERO per Watt. The only cost is the initial manufacturing cost! Presumably one could want to know
how much energy will a solar cell generate over its lifetime.
But this number will come in Jules or Watt x hour units. ]]>Mar 27th 2008 6:12PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/Mar 27th 2008 10:50PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/Mar 27th 2008 6:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/]]>Mar 27th 2008 6:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells//ducks]]>Mar 27th 2008 6:52PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/Mar 27th 2008 8:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/---------
Assuming things all go smoothly within a year on a larger scale...]]>Mar 27th 2008 11:05PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/Mar 27th 2008 11:47PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/Mar 28th 2008 4:10PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/mit-spin-off-1366-technologies-touts-better-cheaper-solar-cells/Mar 29th 2008 1:09AM