<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/pandigitals-pantouch-wifi-bluetooth-photo-frames-cause-bu/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/pandigitals-pantouch-wifi-bluetooth-photo-frames-cause-bu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/pandigitals-pantouch-wifi-bluetooth-photo-frames-cause-bu/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thanks, Thomas Ricker, for writing proper prices ($250, not $249.99)!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shinigami]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2008 7:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/pandigitals-pantouch-wifi-bluetooth-photo-frames-cause-bu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/pandigitals-pantouch-wifi-bluetooth-photo-frames-cause-bu/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well it makes pretty good sense to me if it's a digital frame with album function.  You can scroll pictures without buttons sticking out.  It wouldn't look too much a picture frame with buttons on it.  Then again I don't see the need for these, you still have to plug it in.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NxP3]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2008 8:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/pandigitals-pantouch-wifi-bluetooth-photo-frames-cause-bu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/pandigitals-pantouch-wifi-bluetooth-photo-frames-cause-bu/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree- why aren't people making these battery operated? I have a phone that connects to wifi & I turn it on when I need it (all the time, of course). Why keep these things tethered w/ cords? Real photo frames don't need that.<br><br>Wait till color e-ink changes this world (or some variant of it): Picture of choice always on, no power use. Then flip to the next or another when you want change. I imagine everything in the home could be like this. We have tons of shots & posters we just can't put up- not enough wall space. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2008 12:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/pandigitals-pantouch-wifi-bluetooth-photo-frames-cause-bu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/pandigitals-pantouch-wifi-bluetooth-photo-frames-cause-bu/</guid><description><![CDATA[Everything will be touchscreen in the near future.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sunEagle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 8th 2008 2:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/pandigitals-pantouch-wifi-bluetooth-photo-frames-cause-bu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/pandigitals-pantouch-wifi-bluetooth-photo-frames-cause-bu/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why can't they integrate touch into the frame if buttons are so bad?  All I can imagine is a nice glossy screen covered with fingerprints.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Culp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2008 8:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/pandigitals-pantouch-wifi-bluetooth-photo-frames-cause-bu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/pandigitals-pantouch-wifi-bluetooth-photo-frames-cause-bu/</guid><description><![CDATA[actually, looking at the picture again, the interface seems to be indicating touch on the white outer bezel. Maybe someone finally got it right?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Culp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2008 8:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/pandigitals-pantouch-wifi-bluetooth-photo-frames-cause-bu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/pandigitals-pantouch-wifi-bluetooth-photo-frames-cause-bu/</guid><description><![CDATA[i'd like to think so, looks like a good use for the image background aka the part of the device which isn't the frame or the image itself]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MattyG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2008 10:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/pandigitals-pantouch-wifi-bluetooth-photo-frames-cause-bu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/pandigitals-pantouch-wifi-bluetooth-photo-frames-cause-bu/</guid><description><![CDATA[Isn't a photo frame supposed to ... you know ... just quietly sit there and  ... you know ... show photos unattended?<br><br>I mean, if i wanted to push buttons I'd .. you know ... use a PC?<br><br>Somehow a touchscreen that doesn't get touched a LOT seems like ... you know ... kinda out of touch with reality.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Button Button]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2008 8:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/pandigitals-pantouch-wifi-bluetooth-photo-frames-cause-bu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/pandigitals-pantouch-wifi-bluetooth-photo-frames-cause-bu/</guid><description><![CDATA[they look a little more elegant on a shelf or wall than your average PC, and consume a lot less energy. <br>In reality, I have found the slideshow effect so distracting that I end up playing with the frame for a while and switching it off. <br>Photo frames are a bit like daytime TV: too eye-catching to simply glance at, but not entertaining enough to sit and watch for very long.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2008 11:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/pandigitals-pantouch-wifi-bluetooth-photo-frames-cause-bu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/pandigitals-pantouch-wifi-bluetooth-photo-frames-cause-bu/</guid><description><![CDATA[What's really scary is infecting your computer with a virus from one of these things!<br><br><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/insignia-photo-frame-virus-much-nastier-than-originally-thought/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/15/insignia-photo-frame-virus-much-nastier-than-originally-thought/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Davis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2008 9:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/pandigitals-pantouch-wifi-bluetooth-photo-frames-cause-bu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/pandigitals-pantouch-wifi-bluetooth-photo-frames-cause-bu/</guid><description><![CDATA[why would anyone want to touch a frame more than once, after you have set it to do what you want it to do?<br><br>wouldn't it be a better option to just have a utility on a comp to set the frame up once, and then let it do what it does (show pictures).<br><br>If one needs to change how pictures are displayed etc, just hook it up via usb for 2 minutes, and you are all set again.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[y3k.nik]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2008 9:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/pandigitals-pantouch-wifi-bluetooth-photo-frames-cause-bu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/pandigitals-pantouch-wifi-bluetooth-photo-frames-cause-bu/</guid><description><![CDATA[A touch screen would actually make these things worth what they charge now for a regular digital picture frame. You can buy a 17" LCD monitor for the price of a 7" digital picture frame. I dont' see why they are so expensive.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Christian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2008 10:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/pandigitals-pantouch-wifi-bluetooth-photo-frames-cause-bu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/pandigitals-pantouch-wifi-bluetooth-photo-frames-cause-bu/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think Steve Jobs has nightmares about buttons.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh L]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2008 10:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/pandigitals-pantouch-wifi-bluetooth-photo-frames-cause-bu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/pandigitals-pantouch-wifi-bluetooth-photo-frames-cause-bu/</guid><description><![CDATA[The Kodak one posted last week looks sexier.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jared]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2008 11:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/pandigitals-pantouch-wifi-bluetooth-photo-frames-cause-bu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/pandigitals-pantouch-wifi-bluetooth-photo-frames-cause-bu/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would like to get one to see if I could use it as a touch screen interface for my PC. $250 is a great price for a 10 inch touch screen.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2008 11:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/pandigitals-pantouch-wifi-bluetooth-photo-frames-cause-bu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/pandigitals-pantouch-wifi-bluetooth-photo-frames-cause-bu/</guid><description><![CDATA[The killer thing about these is that they have Wi-Fi capability.  Hopefully that means that they don't require a computer, but rather just a live Internet connection via a wireless access point/router.  Ceiva has been waiting to get its ass kicked for years now, with their monopoly (and extraordinary rip-off) on serving photos to frames automatically.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2008 1:05PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>