<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for BenQ's Atom-based MID gets detailed</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for BenQ's Atom-based MID gets detailed</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BenQ's Atom-based MID gets detailed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</guid><description><![CDATA[benQ - call me when you change your company name and i'm not ashamed to say it when someone asks me, "hey what do you have there?"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sinai]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 18th 2008 5:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BenQ's Atom-based MID gets detailed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've been using a Benq Joybook 7000 for three years right now, and I can say without dubts it's the best q/p notebook I ever seen in ten years (a really good designt too).<br>So...even if the name sounds bad, the product itself should be really good ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgpx78]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 21st 2008 9:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BenQ's Atom-based MID gets detailed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</guid><description><![CDATA[agreed terrible name benq lol, which O.S. it does run?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fusion]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 18th 2008 6:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BenQ's Atom-based MID gets detailed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</guid><description><![CDATA[agreed terrible name benq lol, which O.S. does it run?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fusion]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 18th 2008 6:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BenQ's Atom-based MID gets detailed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</guid><description><![CDATA[<br>Hm.  Make the screen slide up to reveal a Qwerty keyboard ... a 1GB RAM option ... and maybe options for more SSD, OR add an SDHC (or microSDHC, but not miniSD/SDHC) slot... and make the GSM radio have SMS/MMS capability plus be both AT&T and T-Mo-USA compatible (European being a nice bonus) ... and I might be interested.<br><br>What are the different face buttons?<br><br>Middle left looks like "home" and the one under it looks like back or escape (the Nokias use that button symbol for back/escape).  What's that strip/bar above home?<br><br>And are the two right buttons a dpad and a select button?<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[john]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 18th 2008 6:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BenQ's Atom-based MID gets detailed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</guid><description><![CDATA[strip could be some sort of a scroll sensor?<br><br>and yeah, would be nice if the stepped up their game on the memory options.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 18th 2008 6:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BenQ's Atom-based MID gets detailed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'll buy one for $500.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bachviet]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 18th 2008 6:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BenQ's Atom-based MID gets detailed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'd buy one when one of all these MIDs finally come out]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JohnTitor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 18th 2008 6:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BenQ's Atom-based MID gets detailed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'd wait until the EEE has a faster Atom shoved into it and buy that instead.  Should happen about the same time (the instant Intel officially lets Atom out the door).  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh Warner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 18th 2008 9:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BenQ's Atom-based MID gets detailed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not only is BenQ a terrible name, the logo has no appeal whatsoever. These guys don't seem to realize what branding means..<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xoxo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 19th 2008 10:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BenQ's Atom-based MID gets detailed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</guid><description><![CDATA[The 1.6 Ghz Atom seems to get horrible performance (noticeably slower than a 900 Mhz Celeron M), so I can't imagine what kind of performance this is going to get you.  Look for Youtube videos too look like slideshows, expecially full screen.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[0megapart!cle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 18th 2008 7:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BenQ's Atom-based MID gets detailed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Are all these new-fangled MIDs going to be fully flash and java capable? And of course, will it play Doom?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Smacksmackums]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 19th 2008 3:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BenQ's Atom-based MID gets detailed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</guid><description><![CDATA["direct touch and free movement to surf on internet,"<br><br>Classic "engrish" speaking chinese marketing departments, eh?  I have to give them credit though, they've come a long way in the last 10+ years, during which they've marketed and marked up their product boxes of knockoff american products with names like "sun-moon-star CDROM drive", "Patriot motherboard" and case fans with text on the box to the effect of "highest cooling satisfaction for you!"<br><br>Well done, BenQ<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Truth_Bringer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 19th 2008 4:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BenQ's Atom-based MID gets detailed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Epic Fail !!!!!!!!!!!!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rayan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 19th 2008 6:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BenQ's Atom-based MID gets detailed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</guid><description><![CDATA[what's wrong with BenQ , it is super cute , isn't it?<br><br>I think Samsung is much worse.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bull]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 19th 2008 2:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BenQ's Atom-based MID gets detailed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Samsung actually makes sense though, seeing as it's a Korean name. BenQ is something that a bunch of nerds pulled out of their asses.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[daliminator2000]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 19th 2008 8:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BenQ's Atom-based MID gets detailed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</guid><description><![CDATA[BenQ stands for "Bringing enjoyment and Quality to life".<br>but there are many worse names back in Taiwan.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Viakenny]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 19th 2008 1:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BenQ's Atom-based MID gets detailed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ Bull<br><br>Samsung sounds bad I know,<br>BenQ is slightly better... Didn't they change it to Qisda or something?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pscs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 19th 2008 2:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BenQ's Atom-based MID gets detailed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/benqs-atom-based-mid-gets-detailed/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think that BenQ is pretty good. They certainly cost a lot less than the Samsungs of this world. The MID looks fun. If I can do all of my chatting and my Skype-ing on it... all that stuff I can't do at the office or stuff I don'w want to open up my computer to do, then, it's probably fun.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 12th 2008 4:11AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
