<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[Researchers tout 20 million processor-strong supercomputer to study biology and aging diseases...and save lifes]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ike Turner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 12:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[Finally, a computer that will run Vista.<br><br>Pimps forever!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[clak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 12:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[THIS IS AN ABSOLUTE WASTE OF TECHNOLOGY.<br><br>I could use this to run Crysis.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Flashpoint]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 12:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[this monster may have potential. But it will have one impact on global climate which i'm already certain about.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[stefan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 12:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[Skynet here we come...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kiwi616]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 1:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[I heard about that computer. Its called the Playstation 4  or maybe PS5 depending when the next Crysis game comes out. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Rhyne]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 2:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[is it really necessary? <br>I mean really? <br><br>I don't see how knowing more of what the climate is changing will do. Have you seen the hurricanes and tornadoes that we have at least a week of warning, that kill 20k people?<br><br>I think we need a better way of handling everything first. Then, we can worry about trying to tell what mother nature will do next.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gorillamonk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 3:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[Perhaps someone should point them at an IBM BlueGene which uses Power chips, which come from the embedded market side also.<br><br>Now admittedly the current version will not scale to 20 million (only a paltry 884,736 to get you at 3 PetaFlops), but future versions should get you closer]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 4:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[uhm...neat?  I do like the idea of a monster PC of course.  Not sure they'll get anything useful for their money..but hey.  Neat computer.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 12:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wings, butterfly, ect.<br>1km? Try a differential volume element. Then you can accurately model the environment!<br>Lorenz must be rolling in his grave.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[radia]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 12:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA["That, they say, would be enough for it to create climate models at 1-kilometer scale"<br><br>How does this make sense. Is this in a day, a week, a year? You could model climate change on an GLOBAL scale with a 486 if you had enough time. (I think lol).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 12:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[No, you can never model the environment on any scale for periods longer than about a week no matter how powerful or perfect your computer is, because it is a chaotic system.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[radia]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 12:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not necessarily, If you were to use a 486, it may take longer than the climate change itself.<br><br>That is lets say you want to simulate what the weather looks like in 100 years, witha 486 it may take 200 years to simulate 11 million years may take 2 million etc.<br><br>So I reckon to be declared as having the capability of computing climate change, you have to be able to compute it faster than the climate change itself. <br><br>It's possible that if you are computing the climate of 1 million years from now u dont need to simulate the intervening time .. but i'm ignoring that.<br><br>And yeah I do see your point .. it's valid etc. I am just being pedantic here.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Johan S]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 12:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[The scale refers to how detailed the models will be... or in n00b speak, how pixelized the output is.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 2:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[At this point, I thought the climate change thing was all but decided. How about we use all of the processing to cure some disease, or come up with materials or engineering designs that will allow us to do something about greenhouse emissions. Check this site: www.rmi.org]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[david]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 12:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just enough power to run vista!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[digitallysick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 12:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[Climate change predictions based on computer models are pseudoscience. I'm not agreeing with the global warming denial crowd, but I think we're a long way from physically proving (a real proof, not some schoolhouse balloon experiment) that man-made greenhouse emissions are responsible. Please read up on Lorenz's work, and see why no matter how good your computer is, you're mathematically prevented from building the model. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Lorenz" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Lorenz</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[radia]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 12:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[20M CPU's will heat up the climate - easy to predict...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 29th 2008 6:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[Now researchers will be able to tweak their algorithms to get the predefined result they want even faster!<br><br>Global climate change has been happening for billions of years!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TwinCityMike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 12:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[So have UV radiation and tidal patterns and earthquakes.  That doesn't mean we shouldn't study them to see how they do and will effect us - especially given how incredibly fast the human race has taken over this planet.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jandalf]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 12:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[idiots like you have been posting false equivalents on the internet for years as well, what's your point?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phanbouy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 1:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[If I'm the idiot you're referring to, phanbouy, my point was: <br><br>Climate change: environmental force that affects everyone.<br>UV radiation, earthquakes, tidal patterns: environmental forces that affect everyone.<br><br>So I'm in support of research to understand and prevent anthropogenic climate change on a large scale. Got it?  Or am I still making false equivalents?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jandalf]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 1:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[not you Jandalf, Mike.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phanbouy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 1:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[Word.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jandalf]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 1:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[I am saying that many of these models are created and reverse engineered to give the result that is desired.  and if you need the model to produce a certain result to get more funding, guess what will happen...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TwinCityMike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 2:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[that's right because why be an honest researcher when you can be a mad evil scientist who reverse engineers shit so that Al Gore can become world emperor and force everyone to drive Priuses.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phanbouy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 2:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[20 million computers, that's a lot of Coal Power wasted. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[I LOVE THE CAPS LOCK KEY]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 12:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[20 million microprocessors, not computers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Low Ranked]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 1:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[COAL TASTES YUMMY!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Xtort]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 1:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[Berkley isn't part of the East Coast. They don't run on much coal.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BigD145]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 3:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wonder if Ray Kurzweil ever gets tired of being right.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Urnamma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 1:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[And since it was funded by Exxon Mobil, they will determine that climate change has nothing to do with man and that producing more oil and more greenhouse gases is in fact good for the environment.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fuzzy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 1:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah fuzzy, cause like everyone knows that if you find a hole in the Man-made Global Warming theory you simply HAVE to be working with the oil companies. It couldn't possibly have anything to do with the fact that the world has be heating and cooling naturally for millions of years - never!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy TGD]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 1:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[wow.. you luddites are really in denial. go back and take a high school chemistry course before you post your middle school logic on why massively elevated levels of CO2 have no link whatsoever with climate change. freakin a]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phanbouy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 1:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[Close, but since it was funded by the feds it will continue to perpetuate imaginary warming senarios even as the earth cools.<br><br>I know it hurts but try reading something other than what the government tells you to. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[willy the impeached]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 1:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[willy, you're a complete tool. you make the tinfoil hat crowd look nuanced]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phanbouy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 1:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[willy, i think i am going to watch "inconvenient truth" tonight (again). I will then take it as 100% fact.  I will then be an expert on this matter.  This should help perpetuate the fear.  If you want you can come over and watch it with me.  but you have to ride your bike, i don't want your carbon footprint to get bigger because of me!<br><br>There seems to be a lot of experts on climatology here!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TwinCityMike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 2:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[twincityignoramous,<br><br>you are a really bad propagandist. before you malign the knowledge of others with your stupid foxnews talking point drivel, be aware that some of us have studied this issue in something called "universities" years before Al Gore popularized it. get over it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phanbouy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 2:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[and by the way, these mystical places called universities have a process, check this out!, called "peer review". yes, "peer review" is a process whereby lots of scientists from different places and organizations give something what's called a venue for publishing. it tends to get more credibility than exxon-funded think tanks. can't imagine why.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phanbouy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 2:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[phanbouy, yes you know everything. You are the most intelligent specimen on the face of this earth. Throwing around nice big words like "freakin a". With educated folks like yourself floating around it is no wonder ecomania has swept across the world! Please do not attempt to insult my intelligence with such inane drivel.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy TGD]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 3:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[wow andy, i must be some wacky eco-freak know-it-all because i mentioned peer review! come back when you have an argument.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phanbouy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 3:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[No phanbouy, I was simply addressing the response which you made to me, personally. Actually, you may be surprised to find that I agree with your opinions regarding peer-review. But that standing, it still remains that the man-made global warming theory is simply one theory among many. I don't buy that theory, since there are, in my opinion, too many inconsistencies. Perhaps with your great wisdom, you can enlighten me to an answer for one of many gaps in my understanding of the theory - why is it that the temperature was rising prior to 1950 (during a period of relatively minor CO2 production) and then it dropped post 1950 during a time when one would expect CO2 levels to rise? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy TGD]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 3:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[phan...you hinted that you have studied this matter at a university.  I would love to read your research on this matter.  i am sure you did extensive research from an unbiased POV.  universities are also driven by funding...in this world of honesty, no one would ever blow something out of proportion for more money and a secure job.<br><br>Also, i would like to see papers from the 90's that were written and studied, by this same mystical place you call a "university", about the hole in the ozone layer....that hole must be at least 10 times bigger by now....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TwinCityMike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 3:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[How many other theories are there? I haven't claimed to be a climate scientist, but I've studied the actual oceanographic and climatological carbon cycles in courses in soil science, oceanography, general biology, ecology, and other courses enough that I'm pretty convinced that anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions can, have, and will continue to play a pretty influential part in the _accelerating_ rate of change in a) extremes in weather, b) desertification, c) sea level rise, etc. As far as I'm concerned the question of what _proportion_ of these changes is caused by greenhouse gas emissions (CO2, NOx, CH4, etc, etc) is small potatoes at this point. What is important is that we take steps to minimize new emissions and maximize sequestration of elevated atmospheric CO2. Why are humans so unconvinced of our own obvious ecological fragility?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phanbouy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 3:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[twincitymike, are you now also laying claim that the ozone hole is a lie? that is very very sad to live in such a paranoid little ignorant world. do some homework before making shit up, ok?<br><br>p.s. i claim you don't really exist and are an autopost bot funded by Exxon corp. you're guilty until proven innocent. k?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phanbouy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 4:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[btw, andy, it's pretty well documented that the lone "renegade" obligatory "skeptic" at any given university just happens to get his or her "research" funding directly from the Heritage Foundation.  but I guess Mike would just say that any publicly funded research in the U.S. is designed to scare us about the environment because....uh.... the powers that be want us to be conservationists and not keep feeding record oil profits and buying useless shit. yep. that's it! good lord, at least get some consistency, people.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phanbouy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 4:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[If anyone even mentions Doom, I will punch you in the face.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[o29]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 1:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[You just did and that was almost as bad.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Esat Dedezade]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 1:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was 95% sure it would be mentioned at some point, and if it was going to be mentioned, I'd rather it be mentioned in a way that threatened those who keep the meme alive with physical violence. I'm not trying to keep it alive, and you'll never see me mention Doom again.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[o29]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 1:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/researchers-tout-20-million-processor-strong-supercomputer-to-st/</guid><description><![CDATA[But does it..... ugh.<br><br>Luckily I can't even bring myself to say it :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[w00t]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2008 1:18PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
