http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/08/samsung-nv40-point-and-shoot-gets-reviewed/ Engadget Comments for Samsung NV40 point-and-shoot gets reviewed http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/08/samsung-nv40-point-and-shoot-gets-reviewed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/08/samsung-nv40-point-and-shoot-gets-reviewed/May 8th 2008 2:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/08/samsung-nv40-point-and-shoot-gets-reviewed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/08/samsung-nv40-point-and-shoot-gets-reviewed/
This is the part of the post where I disclaim that I'm being sarcastic to avoid ridicule from those with uncalibrated sarcasm detectors, unfortunately killing any humorous effect my post may have had. Thanks guys!]]>May 8th 2008 2:52PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/08/samsung-nv40-point-and-shoot-gets-reviewed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/08/samsung-nv40-point-and-shoot-gets-reviewed/Incidentally, smiley's were actually invented because people didn't get the meaning from the words alone I gather (the real ASCII ones not the icons)
]]>May 8th 2008 8:22PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/08/samsung-nv40-point-and-shoot-gets-reviewed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/08/samsung-nv40-point-and-shoot-gets-reviewed/May 8th 2008 3:05PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/08/samsung-nv40-point-and-shoot-gets-reviewed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/08/samsung-nv40-point-and-shoot-gets-reviewed/
the NV series are some of the best looking compacts on the market. if only the image quality was as good as the industrial design]]>May 8th 2008 3:16PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/08/samsung-nv40-point-and-shoot-gets-reviewed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/08/samsung-nv40-point-and-shoot-gets-reviewed/Didn't you think that Nikon Canon Sony Panasonic Fuji Olympus Lecia Ricoh Sigma have better industrial design of compact camera body?!]]>May 9th 2008 1:07AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/08/samsung-nv40-point-and-shoot-gets-reviewed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/08/samsung-nv40-point-and-shoot-gets-reviewed/
they do not know what they are talking about , read their Canon 40D review, they said the camera has serious PF problem , it is the lens you used for the review not the Camera,sorry but they are morons.

Also , ignore the DCresource.com, that guy is also idiot. ]]>May 8th 2008 3:41PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/08/samsung-nv40-point-and-shoot-gets-reviewed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/08/samsung-nv40-point-and-shoot-gets-reviewed/May 8th 2008 3:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/08/samsung-nv40-point-and-shoot-gets-reviewed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/08/samsung-nv40-point-and-shoot-gets-reviewed/
(Although I shoot with Velvia50 and Rollei ATP, both of which are only theoretically 22 megapixels and 34.6 megapixels. One would need a really sharp and good lens (probably even using a tripod), and a roll scanner (they cost like $100.000, however, you can get scans done for like $100)...That doesn't really matter though, as I just make ilfochromes.)]]>May 8th 2008 3:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/08/samsung-nv40-point-and-shoot-gets-reviewed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/08/samsung-nv40-point-and-shoot-gets-reviewed/
Then why are you letting your verbal diarrhea get all over our digital photography article?

]]>May 8th 2008 5:52PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/08/samsung-nv40-point-and-shoot-gets-reviewed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/08/samsung-nv40-point-and-shoot-gets-reviewed/May 8th 2008 8:24PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/08/samsung-nv40-point-and-shoot-gets-reviewed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/08/samsung-nv40-point-and-shoot-gets-reviewed/
I was hoping they'd go for a Hapsburg-Affenpinscher lens this time.

Seriously, I've always wondered if that's just Korenglish for "we have precision lenses too". I have never heard of THAT German lens outfit -- except on a Samsung camera. [Insert fake German accent] Are our lenses as exciting to drive as our phones?

]]>May 9th 2008 7:19AM