<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Dang, that screen has horrible daylight visibility.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chrisaroz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 12:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have Sanyo's Xacti HD1000 with their wide angle lens converter. It's a great camera.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[required]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 1:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Damn.  Just the review I was looking for.  Thanks! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 1:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Please mount the camera and upload for us an ORIGINAL 1080i file from the camera, not the .mov files that iMovie has transcoded. It is not beneficial in viewing the sample footage in AIC, because AIC is not a real lossless codec. For true evaluation (and easier for you, as M2TS files are smaller than AIC MOV ones), please upload a true file, directly from the memory stick. Not only that, but PC Quicktime users can NOT read AIC files, only Mac Quicktime users can. While M2TS, if you have a recent video editor on the PC side, it can be viewed.<br><br>Also, a few questions: what about manual controls. Namely, does the camera allow you to have a completely custom white balance (I'd like to use a gray card you see). Can you adjust aperture, shutter speed, exposure compensation?<br><br>Thanks you for your time.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eugenia Loli-Queru]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 1:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just as I said (I just tried it for verification). Us, PC users can not read AIC MOV files at all, as PC Quicktime is stripped from that codec. And the various free codecs out there for Windows/Linux don't support AIC either, only Mac users can view your files. Please upload M2TS files. Thanks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eugenia Loli-Queru]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 1:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Uploading now, check back in an hour. Unfortunately, all the original videos are in AIC format now.<br><br>Thomas]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 1:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[try this<br><br><a href="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/videos/SonyTG3E/robot-dance.m2ts" rel="nofollow">http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/videos/SonyTG3E/robot-dance.m2ts</a><br><br>Thomas]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 2:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thank you, I got it. However, the video you just posted was in 1440x1080, not in 1920x1080. Did you simply record this in the 1440x1080 mode, or that is actually its highest resolution/quality?<br><br>One thing I noticed is that the camera has a hard time autofocusing correctly. The whole time the robot was out of focus and the bricks on the back were in focus.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eugenia Loli-Queru]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 2:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[damn, you're right. it's in 1440 x 1080 mode. Sigh, it's dark now. Will shoot another at highest rez first thing in the morning.<br><br>Thomas]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 2:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[full 1920x1080, 1080ki video now available in m2ts format<br><br><a href="http://www.engadget.com/videos/SonyTG3E/robot-dance-indoors.m2ts" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/videos/SonyTG3E/robot-dance-indoors.m2ts</a><br><br>Thomas]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 16th 2008 2:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Got it thank you.<br><br>The camera is not that good in low light, the image is "jumping". Better than some other ones I guess though. :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eugenia Loli-Queru]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 16th 2008 2:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[maldives?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[v]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 1:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's what I was thinking, too...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Duder]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 1:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[ding ding ding, correct you are.<br><br>Thomas]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 1:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Beach House at Manafaru?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 20th 2008 7:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Ed, Wow, indeed it is.<br><br>Thomas]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 16th 2008 4:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sony vs. Sanyo: "spec for spec identical "--except for the gaping enormous difference in bitrate. Pffaw. I'll wait for the camcorderinfo review.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[johnmgbrowniii]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 1:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Agreed.  720 vs. 1080 is not spec-for-spec.  And the Sanyo 720 is not even good-looking 720...with all the macro-blocking compression.  Horrible.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 3:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Joshua, The Xacti HD1000 is a 1080i camcorder with 4 megapixel CMOS sensor... same as the Sony.<br><br>The biggest difference is the recording format and bit rate -- 12Mbps on the HD1000 vs 16Mbps on the Sony.<br><br>Thomas]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 3:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I spent over 30 minutes playing with a TG3/TG1 in a Sony showroom here in sunny (now rainy) England. I concur 100% with this review. The camera build quality is excellent, but it is unusable. I found the mechanical controls as bad as the tiny touch screen controls. I was about to buy one and am v sad. So, going to choose between the larger solid state or hard drive equipped HDTV Sony cams or the ergonomically excellent Sanyo 1000. The problem here is Sony have modelled the TG on Japanese hands. They have lost a sale. I would not buy one at half the price. It is unusable. A waste!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wonderkid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 1:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Go for the canon TX1 - or look it up.<br>Its a winner.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Toleio]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 2:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Get a Canon HF100]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lakersin2025]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 6:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[what is a mov file?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bob e]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 1:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Serious??? A movie file usually played with Quicktime.....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 4:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[WAIT A SECOND.  Are you saying my casio z55 is 4 years old??]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rock99rock]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 1:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA["take a deliberate stab at the display to illicit a response" is a typo, "elicit" a response would be the correct English phrasing. "Illicit" means "unlawful", and I doubt you were trying to get the camera to do something illegal now, right? Right? Please?<br><br>Just my obsessive-compulsive $.02]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[IT-Accountant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 1:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Really nasty artefacts. Definitely not the camera to buy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[peterjohndean1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 1:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Interlaced sux, progressive rules.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[heffeque]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 1:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[to my knowledge, there is no 1080p handycam that comes in "handy".<br>the SONY HDR-FX7 was probably the first 1080p/24p camcorder that's actually in SMALL size. there are some handycams capturing 1080p but they don't record it that way, wiki for HDV may help finding the reasons.<br>also if i want a 1080p i'd make sure i'm a prosumer, otherwise it's just wasting of $$.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 3:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[720p looked a lot better than 1080i just for the simple reason that the interlacing is horribly distracting and awful looking. The uneven parallel lines just make HD videos look like some crappy big YouTube video, specially when no advanced deinterlacing process is added.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[heffeque]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 5:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Dear Engadget,<br><br>A fantastic feature to have on such lengthy reviews would be a "bottom line" section. I love your prose, but please remember that many readers have only a minute or so to glance at an article. For items that are about the bottom line, a simple "pro/con" summary at the end would be very nice.<br><br>Many people skip reading reviews that don't synopsize themselves. Some very picky folk even consider it arrogant for a review not to. (Not saying that folk is me)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 1:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Uh, perhaps you missed the final section titled "Bottom Line?"<br><br>Thomas]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 2:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Snap!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Taylor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 2:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Where in the indian ocean is that. looks beautiful.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Camperton]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 2:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thanks for the review, it made me realize that at $650 on amazon, the Sanyo HD1000 is the way to go! :)<br>-Taylor]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Taylor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 2:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Am I missing something here? why is the Sanyo video the only one that I can get a picture on? are these in a mac only format? Or PAL?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[booster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 2:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[damn you engadget, why do I need a camcorder? I might buy the HD1000 just to have...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[slarity]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 2:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why couldn't sony just come out with an update to their DSC-M2.  I think people want a great camera and an ok video player.  my M2 was nice, but updated to be more compact and have better picture and video quality would of made it great.  One of sony's most unique features is the slideshows, low res stored photos, and hybrid shots on the camera as well and it seems that was left out.  this is an over powering camcorder with crappy photos.  I mean people want clean youtube videos not 1080i monstrosities.  How many people even have the capability to watch this stuff on their tv.  burn a dvd or watch it at the computer? hmm....<br><br>That form factor, 480P/720i, 8.1MP camera, at least 5x Optical zoom, and sony's standard camera tools, slideshow, would make a wicked hybrid device.<br><br>they might as well of put a Cell processor in this thing and have it "fold at home" while its charging...  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[S4Rs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 3:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes, where was that beach? It looks awesome. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jose Fernandez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 3:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[The video sample is in Sony's stupid format that no one can read.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shenzhov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 3:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Another proprietary Sony format that you can only edit in Sony Vegas ... ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 3:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[OK --I'll bite ---why are your feet backwards]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mugwump]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 3:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Uh, one foot appears to be rather female, that on the left. Maybe his wife came with him, since his kids are there according to the article.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pundit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 5:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Only one of the feet are his. He's probably with someone else.<br><br>I'm shocked to see these photos aren't blurry. Good job Thomas!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 5:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I assume that you took the first photo of the TG3E/TG1 camera with your Casio Exilim.  Can you post a photo of the Exilim taken with the TG3E/TG1 for the purposes of scientific rigor?  Thanks!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kcandiloro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 5:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[M2TS or MTS are actually AVCHD accepted formats that are also used in high-end HD video editing.  If you don't understand the technicals of the format, you probably should learn or know that the tech isn't for you.  Great review of the TG3E except I would go so far to say that it shouldn't be recommended just for the lack of MP4 recording.  Also this review is incomplete since it's not comparing the actual footage and picture quality compared to the HD1000 which is a similar product.  Also the software that is included is PC only but the AVCHD format is generally accepted by software such as Adobe Premiere, Final Cut Studio, and Pinnacle Studio.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Whtrbt7]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 6:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[ the Sanyo HD1000 has a really cool and sexy design but picture quality is my priority. looks like I will have to wait one mnore year or maybe go for one of those Panasonic little ones, with 12X  zoom. Ohh, I love zoom.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Leandro Almeida]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 16th 2008 2:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, those photos with the table and fruit on them look vividly dreamlike.. nto a lot of sunlight, but the rolled up material in the front left-center looks like ot pops off the photo... maybe its my eyes. Nice stills, I thoought. Anyone else?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PEZ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 6:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why can't you just dump whatever is on the memory stick to your laptops hard disk directly forgetting about iMovie if all you're trying to do is save the video?<br><br>The dump should be quick, the file size is small and you can import it into whatever editing program you want later.  There hasn't been any degradation because there hasn't been any transcoding and which is great if you decide all you want to do is burn a AVCHD encoded DVD.  Straight bit for bit from the camera right to your TV and any Blueray player will read it.  Perfect for lazy folks like me who just want to shoot, burn and ship the disk of to the grandparents with minimum invested effort.<br><br>Sure seems like a better method than waiting around for iMovie or whatever to unnecessarily eat up your disk drive.<br><br>Or am I missing something?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SBE]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 8:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sony-tg3e-tg1-camcorder-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I watched robot m2ts file on nero showtime. awersome quility BTW !!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Irakli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 9:32PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>