<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Sprint and Samsung intro new XOHM PR, no actual service in sight</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sprint-and-samsung-intro-new-xohm-pr-no-actual-service-in-sight/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Sprint and Samsung intro new XOHM PR, no actual service in sight</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint and Samsung intro new XOHM PR, no actual service in sight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sprint-and-samsung-intro-new-xohm-pr-no-actual-service-in-sight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sprint-and-samsung-intro-new-xohm-pr-no-actual-service-in-sight/</guid><description><![CDATA[LAAAmmmmee!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 7:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint and Samsung intro new XOHM PR, no actual service in sight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sprint-and-samsung-intro-new-xohm-pr-no-actual-service-in-sight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sprint-and-samsung-intro-new-xohm-pr-no-actual-service-in-sight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Damnit, you can start making noise when I can actually buy it, not before!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[w00t]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 7:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint and Samsung intro new XOHM PR, no actual service in sight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sprint-and-samsung-intro-new-xohm-pr-no-actual-service-in-sight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sprint-and-samsung-intro-new-xohm-pr-no-actual-service-in-sight/</guid><description><![CDATA[So if the merger with Clearwire is going to rename XOHM as Clearwire, then why are they marketing it as XOHM?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 8:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint and Samsung intro new XOHM PR, no actual service in sight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sprint-and-samsung-intro-new-xohm-pr-no-actual-service-in-sight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sprint-and-samsung-intro-new-xohm-pr-no-actual-service-in-sight/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think Xohm is going to be Sprint's branded service for WiMax. Clearwire is their joint venture that will serve as the wholesaler to many different entities such as Comcast, Time Warner and Cablevision. Each will have their own branded service to market to their respective customers. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[keiff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 8:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint and Samsung intro new XOHM PR, no actual service in sight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sprint-and-samsung-intro-new-xohm-pr-no-actual-service-in-sight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sprint-and-samsung-intro-new-xohm-pr-no-actual-service-in-sight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Huh???<br><br>Chicken Little said "The sky is falling, the sky is falling."  Or was that Ducky Lucky?  <br><br>This is all story time until this merger is signed, sealed and delivered.  I do not think it would be in Sprint or Clearwire's best interest to go ahead with much of anything until everything passes muster with the gubment and the industry...and that is all going to happen in the fourth quarter according to what I am reading.<br><br>This bulletin had no substance...kind of like my post here.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[linderman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 9:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint and Samsung intro new XOHM PR, no actual service in sight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sprint-and-samsung-intro-new-xohm-pr-no-actual-service-in-sight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sprint-and-samsung-intro-new-xohm-pr-no-actual-service-in-sight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow!! The bias is clear, anything about Sprint gets scrutinize by Engadget, any about Apple/ATT Engadget ends-up with brown stuff on their nose.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[p3t3b2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 9:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint and Samsung intro new XOHM PR, no actual service in sight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sprint-and-samsung-intro-new-xohm-pr-no-actual-service-in-sight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sprint-and-samsung-intro-new-xohm-pr-no-actual-service-in-sight/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think it depends on the person writing the story.. Its not the same guy every time... That would be a 24/7 job of d00m!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 10:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint and Samsung intro new XOHM PR, no actual service in sight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sprint-and-samsung-intro-new-xohm-pr-no-actual-service-in-sight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sprint-and-samsung-intro-new-xohm-pr-no-actual-service-in-sight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thank you for that unneeded comment.  It's their blog, not yours.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuck]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 10:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint and Samsung intro new XOHM PR, no actual service in sight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sprint-and-samsung-intro-new-xohm-pr-no-actual-service-in-sight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sprint-and-samsung-intro-new-xohm-pr-no-actual-service-in-sight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Chuck<br><br>You're right, being partial doesn't help.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[p3t3b2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 10:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint and Samsung intro new XOHM PR, no actual service in sight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sprint-and-samsung-intro-new-xohm-pr-no-actual-service-in-sight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sprint-and-samsung-intro-new-xohm-pr-no-actual-service-in-sight/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have a hard time hating Sprint. Sure their low level customer service is terrible, but once you get past the minions, you can usually find somebody whos willing to do anything to keep you as a customer, including giving you 4 lines with unlimited everything, with 1500 minutes we don't use, 2 free centros, and two free motorola q9's for 100 bucks a month.<br><br>They aren't very smart, and maybe being a customer for 15 years has something to do with it, but I'll continue to support them as long as I can keep squeezing them for free and cheap shit.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OziD]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 10:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint and Samsung intro new XOHM PR, no actual service in sight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sprint-and-samsung-intro-new-xohm-pr-no-actual-service-in-sight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/sprint-and-samsung-intro-new-xohm-pr-no-actual-service-in-sight/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's the thing, it's the employee not the Company, I recently learned that Sprints churn is starting to level off.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[p3t3b2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2008 10:37PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
