http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/18/samsungs-82-inch-quadhd-lcd-now-with-120hz/ Engadget Comments for Samsung's 82-inch QuadHD LCD: Now with 120Hz http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/18/samsungs-82-inch-quadhd-lcd-now-with-120hz/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/18/samsungs-82-inch-quadhd-lcd-now-with-120hz/
But we know this will be like $50k+ at least.]]>May 18th 2008 2:00PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/18/samsungs-82-inch-quadhd-lcd-now-with-120hz/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/18/samsungs-82-inch-quadhd-lcd-now-with-120hz/May 19th 2008 3:30AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/18/samsungs-82-inch-quadhd-lcd-now-with-120hz/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/18/samsungs-82-inch-quadhd-lcd-now-with-120hz/
Samsung Blu-Ray players are crap.

Pioneer has nice sets but they're not really affordable.

Panasonic sets? Are you kidding? That's junk. ]]>May 19th 2008 3:00PM