FCC outs Philips Breeze headset -- Swarovski never looked so greasy
Wow. Mr. FCC Photog trumps even Mr. Blurry Cam when it comes to blowing the easy spy shot. That's Philips unannounced Bluetooth Breeze headset with Swarovski crystals presented in a rich, man-glaze of test-lab sauce. According to the manual, the Active Crystals Breeze is your standard Bluetooth headset only this one is "designed by women, for women." Seriously, are we really that different?



















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Shinigami @ May 27th 2008 8:14AM
I just don't understand this thing...
Say, Engadget, would you wear it in public?
ReggieXuk @ May 27th 2008 8:15AM
the post made no sense to me.
Shinigami @ May 27th 2008 8:18AM
Me neither.
As I said - I don't understand this thing. Make a picture of yourself and paste the pic of the Swarovski over your ear. How will it look?
It seems to me it would look... weird. And I don't understand weird stuff.
Hope this helps :)
Fodder650 @ May 27th 2008 9:12AM
Doesnt the one on the right look like a magic 8 ball?
exxi @ May 27th 2008 8:32AM
ugly!!
Anonymous @ May 27th 2008 8:39AM
The post makes no sense because it’s a grammatical mess.
"That's Philips unannounced Bluetooth Breeze headset with Swarovski crystals presented with a rich, man-coating of test-lab sauce."
That’s sentence makes absolutely no sense and makes me want to send over my 11th grade English teacher to give them her lecture on the use of commas. Simply put it was never to put commas to use, especially when a person didn’t know how to use them.
I’d thought I could expect better from engadget. In fact this Thomas Ricker’s other posts are equally unappealing just for there sentence structure and now bring to light the reasoning why I wasn’t enjoying reading those topics even though the topics themselves had some content of interest.
Michael @ May 29th 2008 6:39PM
Me thinks you troll to much... ;)
"Simply put it was never to put commas to use, especially when a person didn’t know how to use them."
Huh?
Do you speaka anyEnglish?
I know, I know... I'll kick my sarcasm meter.
Pat @ May 27th 2008 10:24AM
It'd probably make more sense if you imagined Thomas Ricker standing next to you pointing an imaginary finger at that barnacle-infested-blob-of-oil, and then says, "That's Phillips'...."
Anthony @ May 27th 2008 12:30PM
In fact[,] -- Thomas Ricker’s other posts are equally unappealing just for [their] sentence structure and now bring to light the [reason] why I [haven’t] [enjoyed] reading those topics even though the [subject matter] [itself] had some content of interest.
Actually, your sentence is nearly impossible to correct, a run on (at best) & just as confusing as anything Thomas has put out there.
See- anyone can be a grammatical critic. It's easy. And annoying.
happy_penguin @ May 27th 2008 4:54PM
Grammar Nazi.
CorporateWhore @ May 27th 2008 9:02AM
Have you never been married? ... I'm on my third wife (so to speak) and yes ... they really are that different.
pfromg @ May 27th 2008 8:46AM
what is it?
Phoenix @ May 27th 2008 10:03AM
it... reminds... me... of... the... lotus... breast... images...
EWWWW
Thanks a lot engadget. Now I'm broken again
Dan S. @ May 27th 2008 10:50AM
Strong enough for a man... pH-balanced for a woman...?
I've never understood the recent marketing trend of saying that technology is for a man, or for a woman (or in the case of Sony's Bravia line, 'for men and women').
Aura Mae @ May 27th 2008 11:28AM
Many current bluetooth earpieces are slightly phallus shaped. They are also often too big for my delicate ear. A headset designed for women is not a bad thing from this woman's perspective.
Mile @ May 27th 2008 1:30PM
Finally! I'm so tired of listening to my gf complain about having to wear men's bluetooth ear pieces! I mean, if I had a gf I would be.
Ethan @ May 27th 2008 3:20PM
Were I female I would not think this was less disgusting.
Sachin @ May 27th 2008 8:10PM
It's because guys have penises. There's no way this headset is for us!
Me @ May 28th 2008 3:54PM
I pretty sure I saw this in a Doctor Who episode....
BDub @ May 29th 2008 11:18PM
This is of only marginal interest; this post could be rewritten as:
"look how clever I am I found some information on the fcc site on an upcoming philipps product release"
..... sound and fury signifying nothing
which is probably why the post is completely incomprehensible.