http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/ Engadget Comments for About that Samsung L870 Safari browser thing... http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/
Besides, why'd it take you guys so long to post this when so many of us corrected you? Jeez.]]>May 30th 2008 3:15AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/
Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.2; U; Series60/3.1 NokiaN95_8GB/10.0.021; Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 ) AppleWebKit/413 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/413]]>May 30th 2008 3:25AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/
Thomas Ricker
Senior Editor, Engadget]]>May 30th 2008 3:26AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/May 30th 2008 3:28AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/
So, pure speculation is enough to post alleged "news" but official denial is absolutely needed to retract them?]]>May 30th 2008 5:26AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/May 30th 2008 6:56AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/Seriously, Thomas, who are you trying to fool?
]]>May 30th 2008 3:19PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/May 30th 2008 3:24AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/May 30th 2008 3:29AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/May 30th 2008 3:51AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/May 30th 2008 3:30AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/If you make a fool of yourself, there's only you to blame :D]]>May 30th 2008 1:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/Delete the comments that highlight the fact that the screw-up was yours and not Samsung's.

It was a fair point, since other sites carrying this story were aware of the fact that the browser in question was just the standard S60 WebKit browser, for you to turn around and place the blame solely with Samsung for your mis-reporting of the matter is a bit rich.]]>May 30th 2008 4:45AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/
Thomas]]>May 30th 2008 4:57AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/
As I've said already, there are other sites that reported on this story and were fully aware that the 'Safari' mentioned was not Apple's browser, so that renders the whole last sentence/paragraph of the article invalid - it reads as though you are unwilling to accept that your own jumping to conclusions played at least as big a part in this as Samsung's unclear press release.
Now that clearly isn't the case, otherwise you wouldn't have then apologised in a comment later on but if you look at the article itself, it reads as though you're trying to pass the buck.]]>May 30th 2008 5:17AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/May 30th 2008 5:33AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/
Who the hell does this? Samsung!]]>May 30th 2008 7:23AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/May 30th 2008 11:54AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/May 30th 2008 8:36AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/May 30th 2008 11:03AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/I think Nokia even were the first to release the first WebCore for Windows (long before apple). ]]>May 30th 2008 7:58PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/
you know, when there wasn't other browser called mobile safari]]>May 30th 2008 10:15AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/
It takes a big person to admit there mistake, so don't worry about the idiots. Something was wrong, it's been corrected. Let's move on people. These are not robot editors, they are humans just like us.

Keep up the good work!]]>May 30th 2008 10:19AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/May 30th 2008 10:56AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/about-that-samsung-l870-safari-browser-thing/
Without Opera Mini, I would consider my E65 a non-web-browsing phone.]]>May 30th 2008 12:29PM