http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/zink-based-polaroid-pogo-makes-its-debut/ Engadget Comments for Zink-based Polaroid PoGo makes its debut http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/zink-based-polaroid-pogo-makes-its-debut/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/zink-based-polaroid-pogo-makes-its-debut/Jun 4th 2008 8:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/zink-based-polaroid-pogo-makes-its-debut/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/zink-based-polaroid-pogo-makes-its-debut/Jun 4th 2008 8:56PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/zink-based-polaroid-pogo-makes-its-debut/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/zink-based-polaroid-pogo-makes-its-debut/And not to mention the quality is probably better.

]]>Jun 4th 2008 9:21PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/zink-based-polaroid-pogo-makes-its-debut/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/zink-based-polaroid-pogo-makes-its-debut/Jun 4th 2008 9:53PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/zink-based-polaroid-pogo-makes-its-debut/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/zink-based-polaroid-pogo-makes-its-debut/
Certainly for this one is more expensive that paying for prints. People are paying a premium for the portable convenience.]]>Jun 4th 2008 9:55PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/zink-based-polaroid-pogo-makes-its-debut/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/zink-based-polaroid-pogo-makes-its-debut/Jun 4th 2008 10:12PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/zink-based-polaroid-pogo-makes-its-debut/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/zink-based-polaroid-pogo-makes-its-debut/Jun 4th 2008 10:15PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/zink-based-polaroid-pogo-makes-its-debut/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/zink-based-polaroid-pogo-makes-its-debut/
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0007/00072502c211zoom.asp]]>Jun 5th 2008 12:39AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/zink-based-polaroid-pogo-makes-its-debut/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/zink-based-polaroid-pogo-makes-its-debut/
That is a goofy statement. Anyone knowledgeable of printing and photography will tell you that the smaller the picture the closer you can expect it to be viewed. Because of this, small prints need to be of the highest quality. In contrast, a studio print of 12x16 or more will be viewed from a distance and a lesser PPI or DPI is more acceptable.]]>Jun 5th 2008 12:14AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/zink-based-polaroid-pogo-makes-its-debut/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/zink-based-polaroid-pogo-makes-its-debut/Jun 5th 2008 2:05AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/zink-based-polaroid-pogo-makes-its-debut/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/zink-based-polaroid-pogo-makes-its-debut/Jun 5th 2008 6:58AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/zink-based-polaroid-pogo-makes-its-debut/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/zink-based-polaroid-pogo-makes-its-debut/Jun 5th 2008 9:40AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/zink-based-polaroid-pogo-makes-its-debut/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/zink-based-polaroid-pogo-makes-its-debut/sigh. should've spent another year on r&d and come up with:
20 sec print time, 30-40 prints on a charge, $100, $0.20/print
it would sell like hotcakes.
but it's gonna feel like a dinosaur, regardless of being a niche product.]]>Jun 6th 2008 10:00AM