<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[come on Intel, can't you play nice so the rest of us can benefit?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Danakin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 4:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[You need to phrase it better. Now kids play nicely or there will be no playtime after dinner.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[alexmueller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 5:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yay ^^....   Blue Ray Vs. HD-DVD part two.  Whipee.... *rolls eyes*]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iH8Engadget]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 10:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[Great now we'll end up with USB+ and USB- devices.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 4:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[Maybe not, we'll just have to wait until USB 3.1 comes out.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[System48]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 4:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[I for one support HD-USB... Just like I support HD-DVD....<br><br>On an unrelated note-does anyone want to buy my $300 HD-DVD player? and all 6 of the HD-DVD's that I have?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[someguy7234]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 5:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[sure ill give you 20 bucks for the player and 40 for the movies..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 8:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[Great. Looks like the 'Universal' part has flown out the window.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Low Ranked]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 4:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think it's still safe. USB 3.0 will be backwards compatible with the old 1.0 and 2.0 devices, that alone will secure it's place.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wii60]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 4:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[wii<br><br><br>YES USB will be backwards compatible with USB 1.0 and 2.0  but guess what?  We are gonna end up being forced to upgrade all our equiptment or we'll get those<br><br>WARNING THIS DEVICE REQUIRES USB 3.0 - INSUFFICIENT POWER]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Flashpoint]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 4:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[For once im actually positive ranking Flashpoint on this one..<br>I was an early adopter of usb 2.0, even went through the pularva of memory sticks that didnt even function on older usb 1.0s because of insufficient power. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bk7]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 6:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[Where they NOT paying attention the last two years with the whole, oh I don't know...HD-DVD vs Blu-ray thing?<br><br>Agreeing on standards is a good thing. Even for the major companies. Just ask Toshiba's accountant.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[THizzle7XU]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 8:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[the power is an important part of the spec.  Many devices don't work because USB 2 can't deliver enough power.  USB 3 should eliminate extra "wall warts" for things... like the Macbook Air's USB Super drive.  What they SHOULD add is the ability to "multitap" a connection with an inline power supply (power supply in the USB plug between the PC and device from another port or adapter.  That way as many external & mobile device are standardizing on USB 2 power specs, we can continue to provide extra "doggles" for backward compatibility but not have to have Separate DC ports.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mabhatter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 10:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[Jesus Intel isn't releasing the specs so they're going to roll their own? Fuck that! I don't want to have to find a compatible chipset for my devices or buy an extra PCI / PCI-E card to plug in my new iPod or Zune.<br><br>All of these companies need to get their shit together and standardize preferably through a standards organization.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 4:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[Uh, IEEE.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Low Ranked]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 4:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was thinking the same thing, doesn't USB 3.x need to become an IEEE standard before any products are released, even a draft standard.  Otherwise you could be left with unusable hardware.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Rayo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 4:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree, the IEEE will smack them down, ummm except that USB isn't an IEEE standard.  It's governed by the USB Implementers Forum <br><br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB_Implementers_Forum" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB_Implementers_Forum</a><br><br>and if you check their latest bulletin on USB 3.0 :<br><br><a href="http://www.usb.org/press/press20/2007_11_28_usb30promotergroup.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.usb.org/press/press20/2007_11_28_usb30promotergroup.pdf</a><br><br>You;ll notice that the main contact listed for the group in charge of ratifying the standard works for Intel, and neither AMD nor NVIDIA is on the board.<br>So I'm thinking Intel gets to do whatever it wants with USB3.0]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bugster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 9:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm sure AMD wants to bring as much heat as possible on Intel with all the antitrust issues Intel has been dealing with.<br><br>Competition always wants the guy ahead to slow down so that they can catch up. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[orky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 4:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think you hit the hammer on the nail with your comment.<br><br>Intel is doing anything wrong in this instance, but AMD helps themselves look better by saying Intel is acting like the anti-trust suit claims.<br><br>It's all a publicity warfare campaign.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kjb434]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 4:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[Intel,  If it's not finalized then why won't you share what you have already with AMD, with the understanding that it's a Work in progress?   Oh, I know, so you can get a head start on the Devices and shutout AMD.<br><br>Nice. Douche. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Randy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 4:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[Because Intel may have to change critical parts of the spec, then AMD may whine that Intel gave them bad information and misled them and is anti-competitive and kicked their dog.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dustin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 4:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[Because if they give them an incomplete specification, they might diverge from the base that Intel's already created and still wind up with a different spec entirely.<br><br>Unfortunately, that looks like it's happening anyway, so I dunno.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zorque]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 4:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[Come on, we don't need another format war, this would be worse than a disc war, because you could get a disc combo player, but this is a data transfer bus and protocol, and you can't have two Universal Serial Bus specs as it would throw the computer world into chaos, and wasn't this why USB created?<br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Striker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 4:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[Tastes Great!  Less Filling!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mile]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 4:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[FireWire FTW !!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[XGM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 4:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[3x the price FTL.<br><br>Yes I love my External FW 800 drive.  However the price was insane.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Doe.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 7:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have a few FW 800 drives and honestly they were only fractionally more then similar ones with just FW 400.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[XGM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 8:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[Esata, Esata II, FW 400, FW 800, FW 1600, FW 3200, USB 1.0/1.1, USB 2.0, USB 3.0, and now the possibility of another one?! AAAHHHHH!<br><br>This is on a completely random tangent, but alsoL HDMI VGA COMPONENT MINIDVI DVI S-VIDEO DISPLAY PORT COMPOSITE AAAAAAHHHHHHHH!!! all to do one thing: display images.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jimmy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 4:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm probably missing something here as well, so feel free to add to this list ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jimmy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 4:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[There is no such thing as FW1600 BTW, they skipped it and went straight to FW3200]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Catsceo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 5:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[That and you left out all of the SCSI world:<br>SCSI-1, Fast SCSI, Fast-Wide SCSI, Ultra SCSI, Ultra Wide SCSI, Ultra2 SCSI, Ultra2 Wide SCSI, Ultra3 SCSI, Ultra-320 SCSI, Ultra-640 SCSI.  Add on top of that all the differant methods of attachment, 50pin, 60 pin, SAS, and probably even a few more.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kal326]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 5:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[DVI-I Single, DVI-I Dual, DVI-D Single, DVI-I Dual, DVI-A, DVI-DL, DMS-59, just to put out some more video connectors. This has caused some headache while ordering and setting up machines at work.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Danger]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 5:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[what about the ata s and pci s]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[deyanimay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 6:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[There most definitely are more SCSI connectors: Apple decided to make all of their own D-sub connectors instead of sticking to the standard.  Particularly when they used DB25, identical to parallel (printer) ports.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SoloSalsa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2008 2:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well this format war is going to be a whole barrel of laughs]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[toxicpiano]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 4:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[God save us all from another HD/Blu-ray disaster!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[captainpease]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 5:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[Dear AMD and NVIDIA, if you truly want to create a competitive specification, fiber optics is where it is at. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Randy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 5:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[*sighs*  USB 3 IS fiber.<br><br><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9780794-7.html" rel="nofollow">http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9780794-7.html</a><br><br>The copper is for backwards compat.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Doe.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 8:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[Man, these guys are serious!<br><br>You've got two competitors, AMD and nVidia teaming up to go against AMD's other competitor, Intel.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 5:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[Intel is starting to sound like a whiney little bitch.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ijyt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 5:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[All three of them are being A holes and Fing over the consumer.<br><br>Going to B my L on all of their T's.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Podaman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 5:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[Do you always abbreviate single words?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Low Ranked]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 5:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[N]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Podaman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 5:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[Again, I want nVidia to buy AMD/ATi and create CPUs and GPUs to compete solely against Intel.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 5:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't think Intel could compete with ati / nvidia combined in the graphics segment.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 6:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[Horrible line of thought.  <br><br>Why in the world would you want to the two biggest (and pretty much only) gpu manufacturers in the world to become one?  It is competition that breeds innovation.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xB Owner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 8:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is the cord or connector any different from 2.0?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Macdonald]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 5:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[It uses a Blue Laser so it's better.  (roll eyes)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Reid B.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 5:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thats what she said.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[deyanimay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 6:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</guid><description><![CDATA[Uses technology from Monster cable to make it 'look' better.<br>/sarcasm]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zane]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 11:50PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
