http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/ Engadget Comments for AMD back on the Havok physics engine bandwagon http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/but when do we actually get it?

first?]]>Jun 13th 2008 11:58AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/Jun 12th 2008 12:12PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/"to be released in chips starting 2013" announcement...
meh]]>Jun 12th 2008 12:16PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/Jun 12th 2008 12:16PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/Jun 12th 2008 12:17PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/Jun 12th 2008 12:28PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/.
Basically that's what any gamecoder already does, he's just using C++ and not that familiar with the (often secret) details of the hardware, and he can't bake new functions in the CPU/GPU like AMD can.

AMD actually already supplies code samples for using the math efficiently on AMD CPU's to coders, on their developers site.]]>Jun 12th 2008 1:15PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/Jun 12th 2008 1:39PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/
(decided to post this here because engadge don't listen to me)]]>Jun 12th 2008 12:19PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/

I'm surrounded by epic failures today. sheesh.]]>Jun 12th 2008 12:21PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/Jun 12th 2008 12:24PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/Jun 12th 2008 12:27PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/doesn't apple's new shit have intel chips anywaY?
like how the new snow leopard works for intel chips only.]]>Jun 12th 2008 12:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/This has nothing at all to do with apple.]]>Jun 12th 2008 12:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/Jun 12th 2008 12:49PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/Jun 12th 2008 12:57PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/Jun 12th 2008 12:59PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/
http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=574]]>Jun 12th 2008 12:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/Jun 12th 2008 2:05PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/amd-back-on-the-havok-physics-engine-bandwagon/Jun 12th 2008 2:51PM