<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Intel denies USB 3.0 abuse, dangles controller spec from window</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Intel denies USB 3.0 abuse, dangles controller spec from window</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel denies USB 3.0 abuse, dangles controller spec from window]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</guid><description><![CDATA[yeah right.. Intel not using low methods to get ahead in market...righttttttttttttt...........]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Oinquer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2008 5:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel denies USB 3.0 abuse, dangles controller spec from window]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</guid><description><![CDATA[Who freaking cares? I just want faster USB ASAP!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2008 4:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel denies USB 3.0 abuse, dangles controller spec from window]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</guid><description><![CDATA[AMD and NVIDIA should just... Beat It.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuckles McGee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2008 7:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel denies USB 3.0 abuse, dangles controller spec from window]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just Beat It, Beat It, Beat It, Beat It<br>No One Wants To Be Defeated<br>Showin' How Funky Strong Is Your Fight<br>It Doesn't Matter Who's Wrong Or Right]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2008 10:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel denies USB 3.0 abuse, dangles controller spec from window]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hell, yes! I'd love a faster interface too, but the problem comes with systems that aren't upgraded yet so you go from blazing fast to DEAR GOD WHEN WILL THIS THING BE DONE?!?!?!?  ^_^]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Phoenix]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 14th 2008 1:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel denies USB 3.0 abuse, dangles controller spec from window]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's intresting. If so, why are Nvid and AMD doing so? I know it : They need that DUMMY guide ! They don't have the skills :) (I'm NOT an Intel Fanboy)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gijs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2008 4:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel denies USB 3.0 abuse, dangles controller spec from window]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</guid><description><![CDATA[Then what are you?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Juaquin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2008 12:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel denies USB 3.0 abuse, dangles controller spec from window]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</guid><description><![CDATA[Intel is being the same bully by not allowing Nvidia to make Nehalem chipsets.  Looks like they're going down the toilet and they're trying to profit as much as they can..<br><br><a href="http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=7713&Itemid=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=7713&Itemid=1</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Worrel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2008 1:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel denies USB 3.0 abuse, dangles controller spec from window]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't see the problem here.  NVidia refuses to give Intel SLI so Intel counters by telling Nvidia to go frack themselves when they ask for Nehalem chipsets.  There is a give and take relationship.  If Nvidia wants to play they need to pay up with SLI.  Instead of complaining they should give it to Intel, get Nehalem, and then make the NEXT version of SLI whatever that would be.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Doe.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2008 6:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel denies USB 3.0 abuse, dangles controller spec from window]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</guid><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Host_controller_interface" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Host_controller_interface</a><br><br>The truth shall not be known by people who do not wish to learn.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Carl M]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2008 4:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel denies USB 3.0 abuse, dangles controller spec from window]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</guid><description><![CDATA[How about more Wireless-USB first?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lai]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2008 5:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel denies USB 3.0 abuse, dangles controller spec from window]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yah because wireless USB would solve throughput issues on high cap hard drives via USB.....USB 2 sucks ass for anything other then flash drives.  In the age of multiGB disk images and video USB 2 should have been replaced by FW800 2 years ago...at least.  Pitty FW800 is so damn expensive. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Doe.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2008 6:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel denies USB 3.0 abuse, dangles controller spec from window]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</guid><description><![CDATA[How about increasing speeds on the devices themselves first?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Haikibutsu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2008 5:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel denies USB 3.0 abuse, dangles controller spec from window]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</guid><description><![CDATA[You need a faster bus for that..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[601210]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2008 5:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel denies USB 3.0 abuse, dangles controller spec from window]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</guid><description><![CDATA[1st - because with a bigger bus, you can also fit more of currently existing devices.<br>2nd - because many devices are not limited by the bus but by their inner technology and those devices should not slow down the development of those who might be able to go even faster]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Awax]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2008 5:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel denies USB 3.0 abuse, dangles controller spec from window]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</guid><description><![CDATA[My Corsair Flash Voyager GT gives me 32MBps. My USB HDD gives 38MBps, the theoretical maximum data transfer from USB 2.0 after protocol overheads.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kurian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2008 5:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel denies USB 3.0 abuse, dangles controller spec from window]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sorry, but Nilay seems to have beaten you to this story...<br><br><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/11/amd-and-nvidia-accuse-intel-of-withholding-usb-3-0-specs/</a><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ahdok]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2008 5:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel denies USB 3.0 abuse, dangles controller spec from window]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</guid><description><![CDATA[did you even read the article? or even the title at all?<br>The first article which YOU link to is AMD and Nvidia ARE ACCUSING Intel of withholding info.<br>This article is Intel IS DENYING acusations..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bk7]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2008 6:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel denies USB 3.0 abuse, dangles controller spec from window]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</guid><description><![CDATA[bk7 - actually I think you need to re-read it... it's a typical weasel-like answer from Intel... while they deny withholding the spec, they then go on to say that they are not releasing it until after Intel's own products are launched with the functionality integrated!!! <br><br>That gives them many months headstart over the competition on a supposedly "open" standard. Not cool.<br><br>This is exactly what they did with USB 1.0 and they're doing it again - AMD and NVIDIA's only choice, if they don't want to be behind Intel in the market, is to form their own spec and make sure everybody who isn't Intel conforms with that instead of the unreleased Intel spec.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[alf]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2008 6:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel denies USB 3.0 abuse, dangles controller spec from window]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</guid><description><![CDATA[alf,<br><br>I think you're missing the point of bk7's comment. Two different articles, each had unique information. There was never a question of semantics.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2008 8:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel denies USB 3.0 abuse, dangles controller spec from window]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</guid><description><![CDATA[Erm... you're saying these are different because one says "intel denies AMD accusation" and the other says "AMD accuse, intel deny"? I mean the two articles do both provide some unique information the other does not, but they do both cover exactly the same story.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ahdok]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2008 4:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel denies USB 3.0 abuse, dangles controller spec from window]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can they just call it SB 3.0 if it's not universal then?  Open standards FTW etc.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ethan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2008 6:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel denies USB 3.0 abuse, dangles controller spec from window]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</guid><description><![CDATA[It wouldn't be 3.0 then, would it? ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lai]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2008 7:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel denies USB 3.0 abuse, dangles controller spec from window]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</guid><description><![CDATA[As longs as it doesn't slow anything up for the release of 3.0, i don't care what company does what.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Danakin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2008 8:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel denies USB 3.0 abuse, dangles controller spec from window]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</guid><description><![CDATA[The title to this article is just....wow.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gr1zz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2008 10:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel denies USB 3.0 abuse, dangles controller spec from window]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</guid><description><![CDATA[We all know what happens when a "Standardized" product spec gets released before the Dummies guy gets released, you get 12 different, incompatible with one another, versions that take years to finally get working right. I'll take intel's side with this one, and just say release it once its done and ready and not a second earlier.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dan2600]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2008 9:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel denies USB 3.0 abuse, dangles controller spec from window]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</guid><description><![CDATA[Judging by how well AMD is doing against intel, I wouldn't be at all surprised if they didn't exist by the time USB 3.0 comes 'round in 2010-ish...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[aard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2008 9:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel denies USB 3.0 abuse, dangles controller spec from window]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</guid><description><![CDATA[That title made me laugh this morning, thanks for that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Derwin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2008 11:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel denies USB 3.0 abuse, dangles controller spec from window]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/12/intel-denies-usb-3-0-abuse-dangles-controller-spec-from-window/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's not like Intel told AMD and Nvidia to wait while they spend their own R&D budget on working out this Dummies guide. I would expect A & N would have access to the open spec from the USB group no different than Intel. If they are unhappy waiting for someone else to do all the work, maybe they should pony up their own cash and get to work on the spec themselves.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AppleDude]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2008 3:58PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>