<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Panasonic's HDC-SD100 and HDC-HS100 AVCHD camcorders, now with extra MOS</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Panasonic's HDC-SD100 and HDC-HS100 AVCHD camcorders, now with extra MOS</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's HDC-SD100 and HDC-HS100 AVCHD camcorders, now with extra MOS]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</guid><description><![CDATA[CCCP!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[McBUNT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2008 2:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's HDC-SD100 and HDC-HS100 AVCHD camcorders, now with extra MOS]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</guid><description><![CDATA[Long Live Soviet Russia!!!<br>Because in Soviet Russia, you heavy lift camera!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lazerface]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2008 3:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's HDC-SD100 and HDC-HS100 AVCHD camcorders, now with extra MOS]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</guid><description><![CDATA[Heavy camera lifts you, dumbass]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[neofolklore]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2008 8:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's HDC-SD100 and HDC-HS100 AVCHD camcorders, now with extra MOS]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</guid><description><![CDATA[note that the camera already has the "heavy lifiting" feature, therefore the reversal of that is for you to do the heavy lifting. its sounds a little wonky, but thats the correct way]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lazerface]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2008 1:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's HDC-SD100 and HDC-HS100 AVCHD camcorders, now with extra MOS]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</guid><description><![CDATA[These look good except one thing: 1/6th sensor size. This is way too small to create any background blur. The HV20 has one of the biggest sensors in the consumer market with 1/2.7", and you still have to zoom in at around 75% to start get some background blur (so your video doesn't look totally like cheap a$$ video). But at 1/6th of a size, that's just a deal breaker for me as a serious hobby videographer.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eugenia Loli-Queru]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2008 2:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's HDC-SD100 and HDC-HS100 AVCHD camcorders, now with extra MOS]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</guid><description><![CDATA[Does Citizen Kane look cheap? No. Is this a 'Prosumer' camera? No.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[McBUNT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2008 2:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's HDC-SD100 and HDC-HS100 AVCHD camcorders, now with extra MOS]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</guid><description><![CDATA[>Does Citizen Kane look cheap?<br><br>I don't care how it looked like. 99% of the big movies have lots of DoF, so I want my share of some background blur. Not much, but SOME. Besides, I am not asking for a 35mm or 2/3" sensor, I am just asking something like 1/2". That's totally doable and it can keep happy both home users and people who want a bit more out of their video hobby.<br><br>>No. Is this a 'Prosumer' camera? No.<br><br>I am not a prosumer. I suggest you read here to understand what I am talking about: <a href="http://www.osnews.com/story/18870" rel="nofollow">http://www.osnews.com/story/18870</a><br>I belong to a new categorization of videographers: hobby filmmakers. Just like back in 2004 the "home" DSLRs exploded, I want something similar for video. Right now, there's nothing like that for us in the consumer market as there is for the cheap DSLRs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eugenia Loli-Queru]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2008 3:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's HDC-SD100 and HDC-HS100 AVCHD camcorders, now with extra MOS]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</guid><description><![CDATA[*cough* Depth of Field *cough*]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rlc:tk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2008 3:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's HDC-SD100 and HDC-HS100 AVCHD camcorders, now with extra MOS]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, I suspect that increased low-light performance is higher up most people's wish lists than reduced DoF, so this new "3MOS" technology sounds a pretty good innovation. However, there are usually no free lunches, so what's the downside of "3MOS": does something else (sharpness, dynamic range, etc) suffer at the expense of better low-light performance?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LondonConsultant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2008 4:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's HDC-SD100 and HDC-HS100 AVCHD camcorders, now with extra MOS]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</guid><description><![CDATA[Depth of Field is nice, I'm a "blur-lover" myself,  but for talk shows and interviews, this is more than great]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[neofolklore]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2008 8:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's HDC-SD100 and HDC-HS100 AVCHD camcorders, now with extra MOS]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</guid><description><![CDATA[The HV20 doesn't even have a manual focus ring, which takes your ability to have any control over dof and flush it down the crapper, I'm glad a company has finally woken up again and added a focus ring to a high end consumer HD cam... It's about time...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[soundboy64]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2008 9:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's HDC-SD100 and HDC-HS100 AVCHD camcorders, now with extra MOS]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</guid><description><![CDATA[>The HV20 doesn't even have a manual focus ring,<br><br>The HV20 has a focus roller, just behind the lens.<br><br>>I'm glad a company has finally woken up again and added a focus ring<br><br>Excuse me, but I don't see anywhere being mentioned that these Panasonic models have a focus ring. Don't judge from the pictures.<br><br>Also, I don't see anywhere mentioned what is the thread size of the lens, and if it has a filter threading in the first place.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eugenia Loli-Queru]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2008 3:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's HDC-SD100 and HDC-HS100 AVCHD camcorders, now with extra MOS]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</guid><description><![CDATA[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[ Eugenia Loli-Queru<br>Eugenia Loli-Queru @ Jun 18th 2008 3:10AM<br><br>>Does Citizen Kane look cheap?<br><br>I don't care how it looked like. 99% of the big movies have lots of DoF, so I want my share of some background blur. Not much, but SOME. Besides, I am not asking for a 35mm or 2/3" sensor, I am just asking something like 1/2". That's totally doable and it can keep happy both home users and people who want a bit more out of their video hobby.<br><br>>No. Is this a 'Prosumer' camera? No.<br><br>I am not a prosumer. I suggest you read here to understand what I am talking about: <a href="http://www.osnews.com/story/18870" rel="nofollow">http://www.osnews.com/story/18870</a><br>I belong to a new categorization of videographers: hobby filmmakers. Just like back in 2004 the "home" DSLRs exploded, I want something similar for video. Right now, there's nothing like that for us in the consumer market as there is for the cheap DSLRs. }}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}<br><br>Content and artistic approach will ALWAYS trump the look of the video alone. Good writing/direction or GTFO.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BB518]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2008 9:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's HDC-SD100 and HDC-HS100 AVCHD camcorders, now with extra MOS]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah... I'm looking at the fat kid in pink....<br>and so are you]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Micanos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2008 3:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's HDC-SD100 and HDC-HS100 AVCHD camcorders, now with extra MOS]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually I'm taking note of that investment on the right...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[McBUNT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2008 3:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's HDC-SD100 and HDC-HS100 AVCHD camcorders, now with extra MOS]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</guid><description><![CDATA[you said that in place of <br>"FIRST!"<br>Boo you]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Micanos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2008 3:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's HDC-SD100 and HDC-HS100 AVCHD camcorders, now with extra MOS]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ty po vsemu miru nesesh odnu i tuzhe purgu :-D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoball]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2008 3:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's HDC-SD100 and HDC-HS100 AVCHD camcorders, now with extra MOS]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</guid><description><![CDATA[tranieski da gaspaza nouniet]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[anabouboula]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2008 3:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's HDC-SD100 and HDC-HS100 AVCHD camcorders, now with extra MOS]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</guid><description><![CDATA[Love the fat kid in "before Levels Adjustment and after Levels Adjustment" Photoshop command picture at the top. Really makes a visible difference at how this camera records. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cunthor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2008 5:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's HDC-SD100 and HDC-HS100 AVCHD camcorders, now with extra MOS]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</guid><description><![CDATA[THIS LOOKS SHOPPED, judging by the pixels and having seen many pixels in my day]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[neofolklore]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2008 8:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's HDC-SD100 and HDC-HS100 AVCHD camcorders, now with extra MOS]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, this does look Shopped.  Plus, a Bday party like this - at least at the cake cutting portion - would be well lit so the picture quality should be good on any HD camera.  <br><br>If the advantage of 3MOS is better low light, it'd be better if they showed a before and after picture of recording an event outside at night or something.<br><br>And how good are these 5.1 recordings that the camera can do? I've always been curious about that.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shahryar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2008 9:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's HDC-SD100 and HDC-HS100 AVCHD camcorders, now with extra MOS]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/panasonics-hdc-sd100-and-hdc-hs100-avchd-camcorders-now-with-e/</guid><description><![CDATA[Physics still hold true: the bigger the sensor, the better the low light performance, since more light is captured by each Pixel area. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[stephan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 13th 2008 3:53PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
