<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for D-Link DSM-210 unboxing, hands-on, and mini-review</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/10/d-link-dsm-210-unboxing-hands-on-and-mini-review/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for D-Link DSM-210 unboxing, hands-on, and mini-review</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on D-Link DSM-210 unboxing, hands-on, and mini-review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/10/d-link-dsm-210-unboxing-hands-on-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/10/d-link-dsm-210-unboxing-hands-on-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[As awesomely futuristic is would be to have an interactive display randomly chilling on your living room coffee table, without a touch screen and clear "sci-fi" looking frame, I don't see this catching on.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Blayed]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 10th 2008 8:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on D-Link DSM-210 unboxing, hands-on, and mini-review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/10/d-link-dsm-210-unboxing-hands-on-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/10/d-link-dsm-210-unboxing-hands-on-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, why do all new devices look like big plastic bricks?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 10th 2008 9:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on D-Link DSM-210 unboxing, hands-on, and mini-review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/10/d-link-dsm-210-unboxing-hands-on-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/10/d-link-dsm-210-unboxing-hands-on-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[*crickets*]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 10th 2008 9:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on D-Link DSM-210 unboxing, hands-on, and mini-review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/10/d-link-dsm-210-unboxing-hands-on-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/10/d-link-dsm-210-unboxing-hands-on-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[i like my cute little chumby better and it does more.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eddy Alvarez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 10th 2008 10:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on D-Link DSM-210 unboxing, hands-on, and mini-review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/10/d-link-dsm-210-unboxing-hands-on-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/10/d-link-dsm-210-unboxing-hands-on-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[If they'd put vnc on it, and a touchscreen I'd buy it.  It'll be the new universal remote. I wonder who doesn't want that to happen.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[huh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 10th 2008 11:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on D-Link DSM-210 unboxing, hands-on, and mini-review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/10/d-link-dsm-210-unboxing-hands-on-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/10/d-link-dsm-210-unboxing-hands-on-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why has nobody done this yet? It seems so simple. I have way more than 1GB of photos, and more than would fill any card. That being said I am not going to upload all of my photos to flickr or any other online photo site.<br><br>Why can't you pull photos off my network? When you can figure out how to do that, I will buy it. But until then it's just another stupid photo frame that I have to go out of my way to use.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[thequinox]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 10th 2008 12:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on D-Link DSM-210 unboxing, hands-on, and mini-review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/10/d-link-dsm-210-unboxing-hands-on-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/10/d-link-dsm-210-unboxing-hands-on-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[It plays ads?  Ugly, clunky UI?  Please.  What a failure.<br><br>There are so many of these things out there, and no one ever seems to really get it right.  They get close in some ways, but then always manage to foul something up that makes a person not want to bother with them at all.<br><br>Why doesn't Apple make a photo frame?  Considering how simple a photo frame is by nature and how nicely Apple designs hardware and UI's, they'd probably be one of the few companies, if not the only one, who could actually do it right.<br><br>And yes, of course, no company does everything just perfect - Apple is no exception.  But most of us can at least acknowledge Apple's prowess in terms of designing and making things.<br><br>Not to mention, they could create an app or integrate software features that could run on a Mac or PC, iPhone, iPod Touch, etc., that could tie in nicely and allow wireless communication with a photo frame of their making.<br><br>I'm no Apple shill, but I do have eyes, and I know if Apple made one, their efforts would make photo frames as popular as toasters.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cassini]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 10th 2008 5:21PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
