<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[are they gonna make nano chips now?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lil_azn_luvr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 11:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[They're already 'nanotech'. Current microelectronic devices have features less than 100nm in size, which is the generally accepted definition of nanotechnology.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MioTheGreat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 12:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[Beware of the Sons of the Patriot... SOP!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Rayo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 12:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[Don't you watch Star Trek: TNG? If you start building nano technology then they will become sentient beings, build a complex society and destroy us! Do you really want that? Well do you?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ez054098]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 1:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[Same crap different name]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Viru]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 11:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[That pic is irritating and headache-inducing.  I didn't know you guys knew my ex wife.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Christian Martin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 12:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[This one is much worse.<br><br><a href="http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/7216/1182276335363ef3.gif" rel="nofollow">http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/7216/1182276335363ef3.gif</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Towncivilian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 1:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[thanks for that linky Towncivilian its now my desktop wallpaper... lol... i likes it :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[otterpop78]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 12th 2008 4:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[Great image Scant, stare at for 30 second and then look around for a neat bloom effect.   If you are photosensitive avoid it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JRock]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 1:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[We are not mad scientists! <br><br>We are just pissed off that we couldn't get our new 3G iPhones activated today!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 12:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can't we go one post without being reminded it's July 11th? <br>ffs enough already. The technological world does not stand still in the face of Apple.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[skant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 12:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA["kvetching" is my new "hella" <br><br>it makes me want to gouge my eyes out.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fingal]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 12:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[Kvetching and hella don't mean the same thing.  And I don't think anyone outside of NorCal uses the term hella.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ddub]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 1:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[It made its way up to Oregon a bit ago. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Reader]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 1:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh, it's in Kansas. Fo Sho.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JW]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 3:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[No they don't mean the same thing. But I hate them the same.<br><br>And anyone who watches SouthPark might use Hella.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fingal]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 1:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[did someone say nanotech???<br><br>i love ratchet & clank!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EI8HT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 12:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[nice<br><br>great game too]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Danakin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 12:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think it looks like something Wallace & Gromit cooked up in the basement.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 12:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is this the UPC code on the back of the iphones?  No wonder they can't get em activated.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kimleng]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 12:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[I thought Intel already has 25nm on their roadmap.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[saintchuck]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 12:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[This can only mean one thing: Faster, more powerful iPhones are on the horizon.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 12:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA["Faster, more powerful iPhones (that we can't use because the totally unnecessary activation process is broken due to Apple's ineptitude) are on the horizon."<br><br>T,FIFY]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh L]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 12:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[That is a nice seersucker pattern.  Change the black a light khaki and I'll take that in a 42 long.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[redgar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 12:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[And uh, what does this have to do with the IPhone? AHH, next gen iPhones could be faster. Got it. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BigTeebo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 12:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not only does your comment fail, but somebody already posted it a few posts before you. Way to fail at failing, and no, that does not mean you won.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dillon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 12:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[This technology is going to be huge.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 12:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[no, it's going to be small. Incredibly small actually ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dillon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 12:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[i see what you did there. :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 1:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[There are many ways to make simple grid structures that small, not really that impressive.  Making logic patterns or interconnects that small is the problem.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 12:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, it would appear they're using wave interference to achieve their results, I wonder how well that setup can be translated into actual microcircuits, as most structures on an IC do not consist of long, straight, parallel lines... ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Faar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 12th 2008 10:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[yeah, because "nanotechnology" is such a big, bad, scary word . . .]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 12:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[no kidding... is "photolithographic" really the scariest word they could find in the article?<br><br>Photo. Lithograph. aren't most people familiar with those terms? but when you COMBINE 'em.... watch out! scary business. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 1:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[Has anyone ever wondered if Moore's Law was created/theorized/hypothesized solely to keep the technology industry from being complacent? Even if not, it's done a good job at it anyway.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Padilla]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 12:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[If any of you had morals, you would not support nanotechnology!<br><br><br><br><br><br>lolz]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GhettoBanjo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 12:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[I see Ryan Block's name in there. The Fraternity is coming after him!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nxtiak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 12:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[ya, your tech geek readers are REALLY frightened by the word "nanotechnology"... lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chase]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 1:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[As a representative of nvidia I'd like to say we need bigger chips, not smaller, what's this hangup with small other companies have? It's ludicrous.<br><br>(Oh nm, realised I'm not from nvidia, I was just channelling)<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 1:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ludicrous? From the photo, it looks halfway to plaid!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[erislover]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 3:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[Prepare ship, for ludicrous speed!<br><br>Ludicrous speed, GO!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Lazetera]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 5:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was going to look for the apple-less-engadget link, but after seeing some of the comments on recent articles completely unrelated to apples... fuck it. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mmh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 3:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm getting a nice moire on my monitor from that pic :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Starchsky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2008 5:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[How does this relate to the iPhone?<br><br>LOL, just jokin'...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cassini]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 12th 2008 3:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microchip breakthrough could keep Moore's law intact (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/microchip-breakthrough-could-keep-moores-law-intact-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[does moore's law take in to account population or interest?<br><br>idea-bot 9000]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tomokazu.osada]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 15th 2008 3:00AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>