http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/ Engadget Comments for iPod touch 1.1.5 shows up, confusion abounds http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/Good :)]]>Jul 15th 2008 7:24PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/]]>Jul 15th 2008 7:22PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/Jul 15th 2008 7:54PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/Jul 15th 2008 8:09PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/Jul 15th 2008 9:00PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/
I've concluded that your statement, undoubtedly, is the stupidest thing I have EVER read! I am in awe of you.

Here is your complimentary cheese wheel and plaque. Now begone.]]>Jul 15th 2008 9:37PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/Jul 15th 2008 10:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/
They ran iphone hooplah perpetually and certainly didn't play up the fact that 2.0 OS has been BRICKING IPHONES.

And not just unlocked iphones. Its been bricking 1st generation, legal iphones.]]>Jul 15th 2008 11:17PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/
/Princess Bride quote]]>Jul 15th 2008 11:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/Jul 15th 2008 11:32PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/
.....is that what you all read? ...because that's what I read.]]>Jul 17th 2008 11:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/Jul 15th 2008 7:24PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/
But on the other hand, Apple is plain stupid for charging customers on something that the iPhone gets for free. Just because we don't need a phone we get hurt in the end because we didn't want to buy what Apple wanted us to buy? Even worse. Those of us who do have the iPod touch are spending more money now then the phone!!!!!!!!! But oh no. We didn't get the Phone so we are the ones taht get raped. Apple overcharged us immensely on the touch and now keep trying to charge more. Something needs to be done.]]>Jul 15th 2008 7:26PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/
you're worthless.]]>Jul 15th 2008 7:27PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/
And if you are out its effort to connect to a network anyway.]]>Jul 15th 2008 7:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/Jul 15th 2008 9:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/
If anyone finds my P2, please let me know.

I'm stocked for the update b/c they don't halfass the updates with the P2. Sucks to know it's waiting for me when I've so cleverly hidden my P2 from myself. ]]>Jul 15th 2008 10:23PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/Jul 16th 2008 1:08AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/
Good thing Apple has our best intentions in mind. I was getting worried there. I thought that 2.0 leak was for real - just kidding. 1.1.5 is the next "real" Touch update.

Brian]]>Jul 15th 2008 7:32PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/Jul 16th 2008 9:39AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/Jul 15th 2008 7:33PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/
You know what's worse than posting a "first" comment. It's following it by a justification that you couldn't resist and trying to add something constructive to the topic.

It makes you look like a donkey with a monkey up his ass.]]>Jul 15th 2008 7:35PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/Jul 15th 2008 7:35PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/
that being said it's extremely annoying, and i'm rather glad the 2.0 firmware was leaked.]]>Jul 15th 2008 7:47PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/Jul 15th 2008 7:36PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/Jul 15th 2008 7:51PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/Jul 15th 2008 7:37PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/
]]>Jul 15th 2008 7:37PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/Apple is just beggening.
Stay tuned...]]>Jul 15th 2008 9:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/Jul 15th 2008 7:38PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/
The iPhone doesn't get it for free. People with the iphone pay every month to use their phone on top of whatever they paid to begin with. That was the idea of buying a phone and spending more, since there would be software updates.

And no, the new iphone still costs more than the ipod touch...it's just that ATT is paying for part of the phone when you sign a contract with them.

Why would apple put millions of dollars into developing new software updates for people who don't give them money on a monthly basis? Yeah, I understand you "paid all that money" up front or whatever, but you also paid that money up front to have an ipod...guess what, its still an ipod. Put your headphones in it and listen to your music.]]>Jul 15th 2008 7:39PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/
]]>Jul 15th 2008 7:39PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/Jul 15th 2008 7:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/Jul 15th 2008 7:49PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/Jul 15th 2008 9:00PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/
not sure I understand Apple's motive here at all.]]>Jul 15th 2008 7:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/
2.0 > 1.1.5

You wouldn't want to revert to 1.1.5 if you already have 2.0]]>Jul 15th 2008 8:16PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/
2.0 > 1.1.5

You wouldn't want to revert to 1.1.5 if you already have 2.0]]>Jul 15th 2008 8:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/Jul 15th 2008 8:21PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/Jul 16th 2008 12:14AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/charging for an update which allows access to the store where you would most likely spend a little money on games and programs is stupid. ill stick with my jailbreak 1.1.4 touch and get stuff for free.
if i wanted to play super monkey ball for $9.99 ill get a gamecube.

my girlfriends dad works for apple in newark, ca and he didnt even know they were charging for the update for the touch and disagrees with it. ]]>Jul 15th 2008 7:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/Jul 15th 2008 8:08PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/
So please, try again. ]]>Jul 16th 2008 1:42AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/First of all its Tim not Tom

Second of all...
"Why would apple put millions of dollars into developing new software updates for people who don't give them money on a monthly basis?"
What about all of the other free software updates that they spend millions of dollars on?]]>Jul 15th 2008 7:45PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/well, what about them.]]>Jul 15th 2008 7:51PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/Jul 15th 2008 7:52PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/Apple and other companies know what they're doing.
They have to charge for iPods cuz they're not on a monthly subscription.
It's an accounting thing, they have to do it so that the governent doesn't take a peek at their books and audit them.
So an apology for to apple would be nice.]]>Jul 15th 2008 8:02PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/
I think developers are missing the point of a micro payment environment, the payments are very small but you as a developer get lots of them, 20 or 30p a time by potentially over 8 million, that's a lot of cash. On the other hand £3 a time (or higher) and a couple of thousand downloads.

Just look at the iPod software on this device and then look at many of these applications, ow boy.]]>Jul 15th 2008 8:05PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/Jul 15th 2008 9:37PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ipod-touch-1-1-5-shows-up-confusion-abounds/
you're name doesn't matter...

and you don't understand accounting...

if you did, you'd get why they have to charge.

way to waste the first post and the first reply to the first post.]]>Jul 15th 2008 8:12PM