<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[So these new Atom chips don't seem that bad. I mean compared to a 3 or 4 year old machine that runs at 1.6GHz, that would probably fumble really bad with full HD video]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 3:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't understand! You went from funny pink dinosaur to annoying pink dinosaur so quickly...<br><br>:(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lazarpandar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 6:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[I didn't reply to this comment! I swear!<br>I meant to reply to the pink dinosaur one below :(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lazarpandar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 7:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[I "Hate" my Yellow Teeth]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pochi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 3:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thank youuu.<br>I thought I was the only one entertained by that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[eric]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 3:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://adblockplus.org" rel="nofollow">http://adblockplus.org</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phanbouy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 3:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@phanbouy <br><br>If that program works so well, why do you know what we're talking about?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pochi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 5:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[because i'm just wily and clever enough to surmise you're talking about banner ads? good try though]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phanbouy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 5:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[Defensive, sarcastic insults that end in "nice try." I do like how you threw in the word "surmise" but completely ignored punctuation and capitalization.<br><br>The entire comment had all of the makings of a 13 year old trying to sound older. And smarter.<br><br>Maybe 14.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pochi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 5:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[What good is whining going to do? If you hate your Yellow Teeth so much, why don't you do something about it? I mean, other than advertise on Engadget. No, I'm not going to click your link. Probably just leads to more whining.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JTM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 6:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[Pochi, your initial comment was funny, but you've let success go to your head. Chill.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Loonie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 6:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[at the risk of ruining it, will someone explain the joke]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lukas88]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 7:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Loonie <br><br>Sorry man. Phanbouy just makes me very sad.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pochi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 8:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[awww poor Pochi. i wasn't raining on your little joke parade, simply inserting a link for a firefox add-in that, actually, does work, but then you had to turn it into a pissing match. how pathetic]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phanbouy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 9:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA["how pathetic"<br><br>...13.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pochi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 11:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[VIA just took a serioues credability hit. shame on you.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Benhur]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 3:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wasn't this posted earlier? O.o<br><br><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-whoops-intels-atom-again-on-video/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-whoops-intels-atom-again-on-video/</a><br><br>This was posted by Thomas Ricker.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[octoberasian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 3:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[wow.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ds]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 4:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[How much more or less are the Nano?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Techie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 3:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[I just voted you up for that]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Benhur]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 3:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[That was a reply to Pochi of course, oh crapy comment system]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Benhur]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 3:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Behhur<br><br>Shame on you?  Sounds like they are a little more evenly matched, and if you did the research the total power draw during these exercises and other tests showed that the VIA processor pulled less total* power than the ATOM.  Each processer sacrifices something for the other, but VIA did not lose credibility on ONE small test that you and your geek friends could reproduce in a barn.  Shame on you*]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadowKain]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 3:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[what would geeks be doing in a barn]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[andres]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 3:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA["what would geeks be doing in a barn"<br><br>hey if it's good enough for Dwight K. Shrute...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phanbouy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 3:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Phanbouy,<br><br>Get out of my Offive.<br><br>"inside joke"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Apple]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2008 3:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[and so was that one<br>(well, that was actually supposed to be a reply to myself)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Benhur]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 3:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[You have got to be the biggest failaholic I've seen all year.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lowest Ranked]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 4:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[he can't compete with Steffen Jobbs]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phanbouy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 4:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[Im sick of stupid people on here.  That was the engadget test, the first test.  Now, listen children, this is ANOTHER test by jkkmobile.  Crappy that they had to re-run a similar topic, but wow does you mom tie your shoes too?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadowKain]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 3:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[No need. Your mom usually offers to tie them.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lowest Ranked]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 4:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[SK, are you mad as hell and not going to take this anymore?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phanbouy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 4:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@phanbouy<br><br>I can't even begin to describe how tired I am getting of looking at your screen name and ridiculously unintelligent comments.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Esteban]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 6:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[Esteban: Thank goodness you came along with your intelligent post to tell us all!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Loonie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 6:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Esteban<br><br>I can't begin to tell you how little of a shit I give what you think.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phanbouy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 8:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is apples to oranges!<br>The current Atom CPU trounces VIA in terms of its LOW power consumption and performances taks equally as well.<br>A faster Atom CPU will be rolled out soon and it likely performance tasks "better" also likely at a higher power drain than the first Intel Atom chipset.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 4:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[numbers and source or your post is conjecture]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phanbouy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 4:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[So not only was the marketing video dodgily produced it was also based around a false concept? They should sack the entire marketing team involved at VIA.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 3:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, in the promo video, they were using WMP 11 while the guy in this computer is using WMP 10. Do you think there could be such a performance hit between the 2 versions of WMP?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ivan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 4:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree, the stuff I had read said that in real tests, both could do 720p playback but 1080 was pretty much a choppy mess.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[madgamer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 4:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[What's the point of playing a 1080p video on a screen that isn't even 720p?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[caramelzappa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 4:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[To test the hardware..... specifically the processor/chipset.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ds]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 4:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[You can hook it up to a TV. BAM! Portable media player.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nihility]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 5:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[aren't these the processors meant for low-end work like surfing the web and working on office apps? running HD movies on EEE pc and acer one would be so cool]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 4:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[I personally tried this on my EEE PC 1000H this morning, with WMP 11, and it failed miserably.  The 720p runs fine, but the 1080p is skiptastic crap.<br><br>Maybe it does much better on WMP 10, or maybe the white plastic helps the PC run cooler than the black?  :-)<br><br>Hating to commence in 3...2...1...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 4:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[Exact same results here on my 1000H with WMP11, but I can play a 1080p movie in Media Player Classic with only a few hiccups. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kald]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 4:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree wholeheartedly -- even if VIA was showing their capabilities on the HP 2133 with a 1280x800 screen, it's going to be down-converting 1080p anyway.<br><br>I'm perfectly happy with the 720p (down-res) on my 1024x600 EEE PC.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 4:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[For those wanting apples to apples, does either the original comparison or this new one mention the codecs being used? I would imagine that would affect processor use quite a bit, and might even favor one or the other due to specific instruction set support.<br><br>Tech guys help me out here?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[uberartist]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 4:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[My Asus 901 couldn't even handle 720p! It plays fine for the first few seconds before the audio starts to go out of sync.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 4:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[WHO IS THINKING ABOUT THAT HOW MANY HORSE POWERS CAN INTEL MAKES BY A +20 WATT PROCESSOR? WHY NOBODY TALKING ABOUT THIS? YOU MUST COMPARE THE VIA NANO PROCESSOR BY STANDARD INTEL CORE 2 DOU NOTEBOOK PROCESSOR IN RANGE OF 20+/-5 WATT POWER CONSUMPTION. THE PRICE IS NOT THE ONLY FACTOR IN MOST CASES.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eraxes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 4:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/via-nano-trounces-intel-atom-in-hd-video-playback-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[I concur. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Reader]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 4th 2008 4:38PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
