<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Intel's Nehalem-based laptop platform to be called "Calpella"</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/intels-nehalem-based-laptop-platform-to-be-called-calpella/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Intel's Nehalem-based laptop platform to be called "Calpella"</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Nehalem-based laptop platform to be called "Calpella"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/intels-nehalem-based-laptop-platform-to-be-called-calpella/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/intels-nehalem-based-laptop-platform-to-be-called-calpella/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wiki sez: "Calpella is an unincorporated community located in Mendocino County, California"<br><br>To paraphrase the rest, it's somewhere between Mt. Nowhere and the village of Bumblefuck.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phanbouy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 6th 2008 2:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Nehalem-based laptop platform to be called "Calpella"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/intels-nehalem-based-laptop-platform-to-be-called-calpella/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/intels-nehalem-based-laptop-platform-to-be-called-calpella/</guid><description><![CDATA[Mendocino, incidentally, is also a codename for a gen2 mobile celeron.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 6th 2008 3:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Nehalem-based laptop platform to be called "Calpella"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/intels-nehalem-based-laptop-platform-to-be-called-calpella/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/intels-nehalem-based-laptop-platform-to-be-called-calpella/</guid><description><![CDATA[LOL... strike the "mobile"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 6th 2008 3:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Nehalem-based laptop platform to be called "Calpella"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/intels-nehalem-based-laptop-platform-to-be-called-calpella/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/intels-nehalem-based-laptop-platform-to-be-called-calpella/</guid><description><![CDATA[sounds too much like crapella]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jjmai]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 6th 2008 2:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Nehalem-based laptop platform to be called "Calpella"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/intels-nehalem-based-laptop-platform-to-be-called-calpella/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/intels-nehalem-based-laptop-platform-to-be-called-calpella/</guid><description><![CDATA[Integrated memory controller? Thats so 2003. Its funny how the underdog constantly leads the x86 industry in innovation. At least for the last past decade. Intel needs to stop leaching ideas and do something innovative beyond providing slightly better performance. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[a12ctic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 6th 2008 3:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Nehalem-based laptop platform to be called "Calpella"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/intels-nehalem-based-laptop-platform-to-be-called-calpella/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/intels-nehalem-based-laptop-platform-to-be-called-calpella/</guid><description><![CDATA[I see it as a step forward in the direction of the "Computer on a chip" model. Credit where credit is due.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mustaine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 6th 2008 3:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Nehalem-based laptop platform to be called "Calpella"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/intels-nehalem-based-laptop-platform-to-be-called-calpella/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/intels-nehalem-based-laptop-platform-to-be-called-calpella/</guid><description><![CDATA[Uh, the name 'Calpella' has been know for like months now, this isn't any news at all...<br><br>There's even some information about it already on Wikipedia:<br><br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centrino#Calpella_platform_.282009.29" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centrino#Calpella_platform_.282009.29</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lionheart]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 6th 2008 5:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Nehalem-based laptop platform to be called "Calpella"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/intels-nehalem-based-laptop-platform-to-be-called-calpella/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/intels-nehalem-based-laptop-platform-to-be-called-calpella/</guid><description><![CDATA[Unlike you, most of us don't get our fun facts from Wikipedia.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OneLove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 6th 2008 10:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Nehalem-based laptop platform to be called "Calpella"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/intels-nehalem-based-laptop-platform-to-be-called-calpella/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/intels-nehalem-based-laptop-platform-to-be-called-calpella/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wait, we're not getting Nehalem laptops until 2H09?? WTF that's like FOREVER when the desktop chip is supposed to launch in what October?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Sundy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 6th 2008 8:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Nehalem-based laptop platform to be called "Calpella"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/intels-nehalem-based-laptop-platform-to-be-called-calpella/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/intels-nehalem-based-laptop-platform-to-be-called-calpella/</guid><description><![CDATA[That what happens when AMD cant keep up, Intel has no reason to push full steam ahead.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beastage]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 6th 2008 8:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Nehalem-based laptop platform to be called "Calpella"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/intels-nehalem-based-laptop-platform-to-be-called-calpella/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/intels-nehalem-based-laptop-platform-to-be-called-calpella/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks like a Persian rug.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Imran]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 6th 2008 8:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Nehalem-based laptop platform to be called "Calpella"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/intels-nehalem-based-laptop-platform-to-be-called-calpella/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/intels-nehalem-based-laptop-platform-to-be-called-calpella/</guid><description><![CDATA[So when did Intel go all vocalist on us?  A calpella chip?  Whats next code name three part harmony?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kal326]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 6th 2008 10:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Nehalem-based laptop platform to be called "Calpella"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/intels-nehalem-based-laptop-platform-to-be-called-calpella/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/intels-nehalem-based-laptop-platform-to-be-called-calpella/</guid><description><![CDATA[Where on earth do they come up with these names?  The weather channel must be in on it XD.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadowKain]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 6th 2008 1:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Nehalem-based laptop platform to be called "Calpella"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/intels-nehalem-based-laptop-platform-to-be-called-calpella/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/intels-nehalem-based-laptop-platform-to-be-called-calpella/</guid><description><![CDATA[lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fernando G.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 6th 2008 4:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Nehalem-based laptop platform to be called "Calpella"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/intels-nehalem-based-laptop-platform-to-be-called-calpella/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/intels-nehalem-based-laptop-platform-to-be-called-calpella/</guid><description><![CDATA[" with the memory controller moving onto the CPU "<br><br>Does this mean it will lack a northbridge? Aka (MCH)?  As far as I know the northbridge is responsible for fast-interfacin the memory to the CPU via hi-speed Bus.  Hmmm..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadowKain]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 6th 2008 1:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Nehalem-based laptop platform to be called "Calpella"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/intels-nehalem-based-laptop-platform-to-be-called-calpella/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/intels-nehalem-based-laptop-platform-to-be-called-calpella/</guid><description><![CDATA[It should lack a NB, just like AMD boards do. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[a12ctic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 6th 2008 2:11PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>