<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Kodak's P520 digiframe touts Quick Touch Border for off-screen flicking</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/kodaks-p520-digiframe-touts-quick-touch-border-for-off-screen-f/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Kodak's P520 digiframe touts Quick Touch Border for off-screen flicking</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak's P520 digiframe touts Quick Touch Border for off-screen flicking]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/kodaks-p520-digiframe-touts-quick-touch-border-for-off-screen-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/kodaks-p520-digiframe-touts-quick-touch-border-for-off-screen-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[You know what also sucks about touchscreens?  You have to move your finger in real-space (not a word, but think about "real-time" and you understand).  With a mouse, I can move my hand an inch and my cursor will move across an entire 17" screen.  With a touchscreen, it either has to have flick capabilities (not always feasible) or I have to move 17 inches...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PRC.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 22nd 2008 10:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak's P520 digiframe touts Quick Touch Border for off-screen flicking]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/kodaks-p520-digiframe-touts-quick-touch-border-for-off-screen-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/kodaks-p520-digiframe-touts-quick-touch-border-for-off-screen-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[No offense, but it sounds like you're really lazy then.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[beamerboy625]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 22nd 2008 11:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak's P520 digiframe touts Quick Touch Border for off-screen flicking]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/kodaks-p520-digiframe-touts-quick-touch-border-for-off-screen-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/kodaks-p520-digiframe-touts-quick-touch-border-for-off-screen-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@beamerboy<br><br>That's a lot better gripe that some of the other crap we see posted here, like double tapping vs tap and hold.  Both would have merits based on what the individual sees as a better UI, but both are pretty trivial, IMO.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jupiterthunder]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 22nd 2008 1:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak's P520 digiframe touts Quick Touch Border for off-screen flicking]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/kodaks-p520-digiframe-touts-quick-touch-border-for-off-screen-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/kodaks-p520-digiframe-touts-quick-touch-border-for-off-screen-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[And of course they make the border white because fingers don't leave dirt marks or anything...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TIMMAH!]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 22nd 2008 12:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak's P520 digiframe touts Quick Touch Border for off-screen flicking]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/kodaks-p520-digiframe-touts-quick-touch-border-for-off-screen-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/kodaks-p520-digiframe-touts-quick-touch-border-for-off-screen-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[I had one of these.  The interface is interesting, but the GUI is horrible.  Plus even after regular use, you still have the inclination to press on the screen.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BK]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 22nd 2008 12:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak's P520 digiframe touts Quick Touch Border for off-screen flicking]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/kodaks-p520-digiframe-touts-quick-touch-border-for-off-screen-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/kodaks-p520-digiframe-touts-quick-touch-border-for-off-screen-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[I saw one of these when I was shopping around for a frame two weeks ago. It's a cool concept, reminded me of the iRiver Clix.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[killermojo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 22nd 2008 12:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak's P520 digiframe touts Quick Touch Border for off-screen flicking]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/kodaks-p520-digiframe-touts-quick-touch-border-for-off-screen-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/kodaks-p520-digiframe-touts-quick-touch-border-for-off-screen-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[Surely the point of a touchscreen is that you press directly on a certain part of the image? Why not just use those archaic features found on old tech - buttons?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Harry Wagstaff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 22nd 2008 12:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak's P520 digiframe touts Quick Touch Border for off-screen flicking]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/kodaks-p520-digiframe-touts-quick-touch-border-for-off-screen-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/kodaks-p520-digiframe-touts-quick-touch-border-for-off-screen-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yep.  This is like the anti-touchscreen touchscreen.  No point in having a touch screen if you are not going to touch it.  <br><br>I know, they could put tear-offs on it like NASCAR windshields and visors.  Gets to dirty, rip it off.  When you run out, put some more on.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jupiterthunder]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 22nd 2008 1:46PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
