http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/ Engadget Comments for Modder adds CCD eyepiece to binoculars, Bill Belichick seems interested http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/
I LOL'd.]]>Aug 22nd 2008 11:10PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/Aug 22nd 2008 11:22PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/
Bravo, Engadget.]]>Aug 22nd 2008 11:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/Aug 22nd 2008 11:37PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/
Speaking of which, adding "gate" to the end of every scandal is also trite and contrived. Should self-respecting journalists avoid cliches?]]>Aug 23rd 2008 1:21AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/Aug 23rd 2008 2:29AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/They always pre-make apparel for both possible outcomes in a game so that they have it ready when the immediate demand hits. Then they donate the "wrong" stuff to some starving country. This happens for just about every sports championship. I thought everyone knew that already.]]>Aug 23rd 2008 3:29AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/Aug 23rd 2008 3:43AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/
It's because I hate the obvious and overused.]]>Aug 23rd 2008 2:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/


i lol'd x 10000]]>Aug 22nd 2008 11:13PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/Aug 22nd 2008 11:16PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/


But really, this modder is a pedophile fersher. ]]>Aug 22nd 2008 11:18PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/Aug 22nd 2008 11:35PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/Aug 22nd 2008 11:47PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/Aug 23rd 2008 12:15AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://i1.tinypic.com/6436ced.jpg]]>Aug 22nd 2008 11:49PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/

Also why do we need to confirm this post by email, isnt that kinda silly.]]>Aug 23rd 2008 1:16AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/
digital zoom is the same as zooming in on something on the computer... it doesnt bring the distant image closer... just makes a certain portion visible and larger... you're magnifying pixels. a pair of 40x binoculars will, however, give you a slightly fisheyed but entirely not pixelated view]]>Aug 23rd 2008 3:25AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/Aug 23rd 2008 2:53PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/Aug 23rd 2008 2:08AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/]]>Aug 23rd 2008 2:44AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/
But yeah the title of this is funny so, lol!]]>Aug 23rd 2008 9:04AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/Aug 23rd 2008 9:16AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/
it's kinda funny when you consider this: people piss all over the pats because they blew the superbowl but these same people wouldn't be so critical or even care if they didn't think that the pats were the better team.]]>Aug 23rd 2008 11:58AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/
haha.]]>Aug 23rd 2008 2:14PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/Aug 23rd 2008 4:34AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/Aug 23rd 2008 5:04PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/Aug 23rd 2008 4:59AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/Aug 23rd 2008 1:17PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/Aug 23rd 2008 9:27AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/Aug 24th 2008 2:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/Aug 23rd 2008 11:33AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/22/modder-adds-ccd-eyepiece-to-binoculars-bill-belichick-seems-int/
I didn't quite know what to make of that until I read it again.]]>Aug 26th 2008 9:10PM