<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Sony delivers the first 240Hz LCDs November 10</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/28/sony-delivers-the-first-240hz-lcds-november-10/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Sony delivers the first 240Hz LCDs November 10</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony delivers the first 240Hz LCDs November 10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/28/sony-delivers-the-first-240hz-lcds-november-10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/28/sony-delivers-the-first-240hz-lcds-november-10/</guid><description><![CDATA[man sonys on a roll today......the world's thinnest LCD and its first 240Hz LCD much much before samsung.<br><br>Atleast now samsung can open up the sony and see how they can speed up their development of 240Hz lcds.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[guerilla999]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 28th 2008 3:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony delivers the first 240Hz LCDs November 10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/28/sony-delivers-the-first-240hz-lcds-november-10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/28/sony-delivers-the-first-240hz-lcds-november-10/</guid><description><![CDATA[All this fancy stuff is all well and good.<br><br>But how's the picture quality? Say, better than a full HD Panasonic plasma?<br><br>Then I might get excited.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 28th 2008 3:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony delivers the first 240Hz LCDs November 10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/28/sony-delivers-the-first-240hz-lcds-november-10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/28/sony-delivers-the-first-240hz-lcds-november-10/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sony likes cowsumers. Cowsumers do not question whether they can or cannot even perceive 120Hz so selling them something twice as fast is obviously going to benefit them. The market machine should say that buying this cures a form of cancer that doesn't exist.<br><br>Ask yourself this, how fast does a horizontally-moving image on the screen need to be moving in order for 240Hz to have benefit to you? What sources can output 120Hz? 240Hz? None.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GhostDoggy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 28th 2008 5:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony delivers the first 240Hz LCDs November 10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/28/sony-delivers-the-first-240hz-lcds-november-10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/28/sony-delivers-the-first-240hz-lcds-november-10/</guid><description><![CDATA[it appears engadget hired less than competent writers; samsung's 240hz lcd was the lcd panel that can respond in 240hz manner (true 4ms response NOT gray to gray 4ms overdriven lcd panels)<br><br>what this is the motion estimation technology that generates two in-between frames to make motions appear smoother NOT lcd capable of running at truly 240hz; no current production lcd technology can really running that fast.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shimman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 29th 2008 12:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony delivers the first 240Hz LCDs November 10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/28/sony-delivers-the-first-240hz-lcds-november-10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/28/sony-delivers-the-first-240hz-lcds-november-10/</guid><description><![CDATA[The benefit of 240hz is more options in how you provide motion smoothing.  At the current maximum rate of 60fps (eg 720p)  there is only 1 in-between frame calculated.  Black-frame insertion (reduces retinal retention per-frame to compensate for LCD's slow transition) is also impractical, because with only one extra frame you'd halve your light output.  So, with 240hz, you have 3 extra frames to fiddle with.  If you do BFI you're only cutting your light output by 25%.<br><br>The other possibility (and this is the interesting part)  is that they could eliminate RGB subpixels and rotate the colors via RGB backlights,  similiar to how 1-chip DLP works.  This would drastically reduce the cost of producing LCD panels by decreasing resolution and eliminating manufacturing steps to apply red/green/blue dyes.<br><br>Also, in regards to samsung in 2011---  this is because they're switching from PVA to IPS.  Because they've coupled 240hz with that, one could surmise that 240hz is hurting color performance with current PVA panels.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[clara]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 28th 2008 1:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony delivers the first 240Hz LCDs November 10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/28/sony-delivers-the-first-240hz-lcds-november-10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/28/sony-delivers-the-first-240hz-lcds-november-10/</guid><description><![CDATA[samsung is not switching pva to ips; pva has its own advantage over ips in terms of contrast ratio (black is blacker than ips, too) & response time (i am not talking about lags though; lag & response time are two different things)  (other than TN, CPA which Sharp is using is the worst of all...pron to backlight leak & poor contrast ratio & angle compare to pva & ips)<br><br>your dlp example in lcd world is called color filterless lcd which only samsung demonstrated before, but it was not perfect. it can make panel processing simpler & brighter (as not much are blocked), but this is still working progress. of course, led backlight would be needed.<br><br>back to samsung's 240hz lcd technology which utilize so called blue phase lcd; a special case of lcd phase that is more stable than more common single axial lcd; because this structure is far more stable, it can switch in phases far faster than a sigle axial lcd. thus, it can provide faster response time in brutal force.<br><br>so why do we want to have 240hz motion estimation other than bragging rights? well, if there are faster motions in scenes, without motion estimation engine that can insert missing scenes in between two key frames (recorded), motion artifacts will be introduced. with well designed motion estimations, artifacts might be reduced considerably that the perceived video quality could be better even though eyes might not be able to follow frames faster than 60hz.<br><br>will i pay extra for this feature...probably not....however, this motion estimation can also introduce artifacts....this would probably work better with 240hz blue phase mode lcd panels.<br><br>as long as sony & sammy are in love, we will likely to see bluMotionFlow240 in 2011<br><br>so far, i think oled will not replace lcd in a big screen tv market anytime soon]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shimman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 29th 2008 1:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony delivers the first 240Hz LCDs November 10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/28/sony-delivers-the-first-240hz-lcds-november-10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/28/sony-delivers-the-first-240hz-lcds-november-10/</guid><description><![CDATA[will the XBR 6 have 240 Hz i think thats the real question to this...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 28th 2008 3:21PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
