While Panny's
150-inch plasma from CES gets its very own room at the Panasonic booth, the new "budget-friendly"
TH-103PZ800 103-inch plasma was relegated to a bit part in the back row of an artsy, rock garden-planted collection of displays. We don't have much to say about the actual display, and we're sure that anyone planning to drop $50k on one will be doing a bit more than taking our word for it anyways, but trust us when we tell you that the 150-incher makes the 103 look like a tiny pretend television for tiny pretend people.
Update: According to the card identifying all these displays, we were looking at the TH-103PF10, not the new 103PZ800, contrary to what we were told. Maybe Panny got the card wrong, but we're gonna have a long talk with some Panasonic reps if we every make it back by the booth.
dick!
jackass
First...to say you SUCK!
Congratulations. You have successfully alienated yourself from non-idiots
why oh why do tech geeks insist on shortening a electrical company names to some pseudo familiar matey nickname? it is embarrassing. please just called Panasonic, Samsung etc. then you may just get a girlfriend
A budget-priced 103 in. TV seems to be an oxymoron.
Interesting Post... I really love it.. thanks
Busby SEO Challenge
Interesting Post... I really love it.. thanks
Busby SEO Challenge
Some one need to compensate for something
Engadget: Nobody fucking cares about 103 inch TVs.
jefffaucher: Engadget doesn't care that you don't care about 103 inch TVs.
i have a 140" diagonal 1080P projection in my living room for under 2500$ i couldn't even imagine going to something like a 62" plasma/lcd.
to sum that up.. I CARE.
every
Forget the story, which one of you guys is walking around with a 10.5 mm lens in their bag? Holy fisheye Batman!
(possibly 10-20 sigma, not sure if you guys can afford nikon lenses...hehehe)
its like they actually have a proper camera for taking product shots this time!
Coole. Interesting Post... I really love it.. thanks