http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/ Engadget Comments for http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 4th 2008 5:04AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/
/something

How do I end the sarcasm?!]]>Sep 4th 2008 5:27AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/And it's going to be aluminium all around again!]]>Sep 4th 2008 5:31AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 4th 2008 5:05AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/I really preferr the wide design and would not consider getting a new one if it had more memory than 8gb.., any other news on specs? how much memory? any other new funky gizmos? like portait/landscape sensor or something??
]]>Sep 4th 2008 9:24AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/
-sent from my iPhone
_____________________
iGet enough exercise just pushin' my luck!]]>Sep 4th 2008 6:37AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/
-not sent from my iphone]]>Sep 4th 2008 7:00AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/
Better than the 'fatty' but with a larger screen than the previous nano... Good no?]]>Sep 4th 2008 5:10AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 4th 2008 5:10AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 4th 2008 5:32AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/
(It's rounded because of the wifi antenna.)]]>Sep 4th 2008 6:03AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 4th 2008 5:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 4th 2008 5:14AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 4th 2008 5:15AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 4th 2008 5:15AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 4th 2008 5:37AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 4th 2008 5:19AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 4th 2008 5:20AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 4th 2008 9:38AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 4th 2008 11:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 4th 2008 5:22AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 4th 2008 7:15AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 4th 2008 5:32AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 4th 2008 7:45AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 4th 2008 7:48AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/
Before the iPod nano we had the iPod mini, in a alu casing. The 1G iPod nano appeared in a similar size, just a lot thinner, with plastic front and metal back. Then the 2G iPod nano had the same shape, but full alu casing like the iPod mini. The 3G iPod nano changed shape, but kept and alu front, much like the 2G but grabbed back to the glossy alu back from the 1G. Now the 4G iPod nano seems to go back to it's original shape. It wouldn't be that improbable, given that Apple always seems to recycle previously used designs and solutions in new generations of it's iPod nano's. Is it a coincidence or am I on to something? No idea really... just something to think about...

I'm wondering what kind of cover they will use this time: glossy alu, brushed alu, plastic? ]]>Sep 4th 2008 5:32AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/
Where are the people who are saying it will look like crap ?]]>Sep 4th 2008 5:36AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/But this render certainly makes the design look more appealing, as the screen doesn't appear curved like in the previous pictures. Cross your fingers and hope this is accurate[-er], Apple boys.]]>Sep 4th 2008 5:43AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 4th 2008 5:44AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 4th 2008 6:04AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/I dunno though, this isn't really much of an update. It's probably not going to add features except a likely accelerometer, so I don't see the point of anybody buying this if they have one already.]]>Sep 4th 2008 7:42AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 4th 2008 9:52AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 4th 2008 6:15AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/
]]>Sep 4th 2008 6:43AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 4th 2008 6:57AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 4th 2008 7:22AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/As soon as some add-ons get released (*cough cough* Adblock *cough cough*) it'll likely replace Firefox for me.]]>Sep 4th 2008 7:46AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 4th 2008 12:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 15th 2008 7:47AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 4th 2008 9:46AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 4th 2008 6:55AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 4th 2008 9:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/
Kodak has used smaller ones in cameras for a few years now....]]>Sep 4th 2008 7:10AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/
I don't really like this new 4G - but if it comes in 16GB at the right price, it's mine
]]>Sep 4th 2008 7:16AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 4th 2008 7:22AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 4th 2008 7:33AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/What they need to do is improve the sound quaity - or is that no longer the purpose of an mp3 player?]]>Sep 4th 2008 7:35AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 4th 2008 8:23AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 4th 2008 8:28AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/04/yet-another-ipod-nano-4g-render-sure-why-not/Sep 4th 2008 8:35AM