<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Next generation Atom processors for netbooks scheduled for Q3, 2009</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/next-generation-atom-processors-for-netbooks-scheduled-for-q3-2/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Next generation Atom processors for netbooks scheduled for Q3, 2009</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next generation Atom processors for netbooks scheduled for Q3, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/next-generation-atom-processors-for-netbooks-scheduled-for-q3-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/next-generation-atom-processors-for-netbooks-scheduled-for-q3-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[I love my Atom.  keep them coming.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kccboy2004]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2008 7:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next generation Atom processors for netbooks scheduled for Q3, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/next-generation-atom-processors-for-netbooks-scheduled-for-q3-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/next-generation-atom-processors-for-netbooks-scheduled-for-q3-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[AMD has apparently gotten the LCUP religion as well. Apparently we'll see some action in November:<br><br><a href="http://www.digit-life.com/news.html?11/00/65" rel="nofollow">http://www.digit-life.com/news.html?11/00/65</a><br><br>Corroborated here:<br><br><a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/display/20080723153541_AMD_to_Discuss_Rival_for_Intel_Atom_Towards_Year_End.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/display/20080723153541_AMD_to_Discuss_Rival_for_Intel_Atom_Towards_Year_End.html</a><br><br>XbitLabs has some other pieces that provide additional info. Search for AMD.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[d00b]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2008 4:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next generation Atom processors for netbooks scheduled for Q3, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/next-generation-atom-processors-for-netbooks-scheduled-for-q3-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/next-generation-atom-processors-for-netbooks-scheduled-for-q3-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[hmm finally some GPU power in a netbook]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[216]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2008 8:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next generation Atom processors for netbooks scheduled for Q3, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/next-generation-atom-processors-for-netbooks-scheduled-for-q3-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/next-generation-atom-processors-for-netbooks-scheduled-for-q3-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Intel's Periodic Table]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LondonConsultant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2008 8:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next generation Atom processors for netbooks scheduled for Q3, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/next-generation-atom-processors-for-netbooks-scheduled-for-q3-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/next-generation-atom-processors-for-netbooks-scheduled-for-q3-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Q3 2009? Finally a definitive answer to "should I wait for the new Atoms?"<br><br>Definitely. Not.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Serial 8-Ball Mouse]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2008 8:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next generation Atom processors for netbooks scheduled for Q3, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/next-generation-atom-processors-for-netbooks-scheduled-for-q3-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/next-generation-atom-processors-for-netbooks-scheduled-for-q3-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[The real question is: If I buy a Lenovo S10 next month can I upgrade the processor in Q3 when the new Atom comes out?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kuade]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2008 11:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next generation Atom processors for netbooks scheduled for Q3, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/next-generation-atom-processors-for-netbooks-scheduled-for-q3-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/next-generation-atom-processors-for-netbooks-scheduled-for-q3-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[as long as your comfortable doing SMT rework on a BGA, no problem. the machine should only cost you $50,000.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[yagorob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2008 5:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next generation Atom processors for netbooks scheduled for Q3, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/next-generation-atom-processors-for-netbooks-scheduled-for-q3-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/next-generation-atom-processors-for-netbooks-scheduled-for-q3-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thats all fine and dandy, but where are the dual core Diamondville? I'm willing to sacrafice 4 watts for a potential doubling in processing capabilities, but I'm not willing to wait a full year for the next generation.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steph-Chan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2008 11:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next generation Atom processors for netbooks scheduled for Q3, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/next-generation-atom-processors-for-netbooks-scheduled-for-q3-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/next-generation-atom-processors-for-netbooks-scheduled-for-q3-2/</guid><description><![CDATA['intel 64'? what's that? ;)<br><br>From what I hear in reviews its advisable to avoid the atom because it's a lemon, I'll go with that road.<br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2008 1:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next generation Atom processors for netbooks scheduled for Q3, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/next-generation-atom-processors-for-netbooks-scheduled-for-q3-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/next-generation-atom-processors-for-netbooks-scheduled-for-q3-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[How do they think of these codenames?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[B3astofthe3ast]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2008 4:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next generation Atom processors for netbooks scheduled for Q3, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/next-generation-atom-processors-for-netbooks-scheduled-for-q3-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/next-generation-atom-processors-for-netbooks-scheduled-for-q3-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would love to know as well. I would guess that while brainstorming, they take whatever the first thing they see is and add "ville" to the end.<br><br>One person was wearing a diamond ring.... They were looking out the boardroom window and saw a pine tree.... <br><br>Yeah, really lame. My apologies.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Phoenix987]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2008 9:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next generation Atom processors for netbooks scheduled for Q3, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/next-generation-atom-processors-for-netbooks-scheduled-for-q3-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/next-generation-atom-processors-for-netbooks-scheduled-for-q3-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Intel bases their code names off geographic features. <br><br>I.e. Tualatin was a Pentium III revision- but first it was a city in Oregon. Merced (the codename for Itanium way back) is a city in California, but it might also be in reference to Merced River. Nehalem (everyone's favorite next gen core) is also a river.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cocoviper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 6th 2008 4:30PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>