http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/ Engadget Comments for Supposed iPod nano 4G really unboxed http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 6:44AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 6:45AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/
The more I look at the picture of this thing, the blurrier it gets - and my eyes start to hurt.

This thing looks terrible, like a cheap chinese MP4 knockoff player.

Besides, who'd want a nano after the touch came out? Just save your'e money and buy the touch. Apple can afford to lose revenue until you have saved for the big boy.]]>Sep 6th 2008 7:27AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 7:44AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/have you ever thought that the Touch and Nano are not headed for the same type of people?
I doubt you would have it easy running with a touchscreen player]]>Sep 6th 2008 7:45AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 8:32AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/
'The more I look at the picture of this thing, the blurrier it gets - and my eyes start to hurt.'

I think your confusing it for your Iporn Nano ]]>Sep 6th 2008 10:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 10:25AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 10:32AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 10:38AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 10:39AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/
I'm calling bunk.]]>Sep 6th 2008 11:00AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 12:12PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 12:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/
No, apple wouldn't be using that dock connector. ]]>Sep 6th 2008 1:13PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 1:57PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 3:16PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 7th 2008 10:15AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/
It's clearly fake and photoshopped and in no way resembles the earlier picture that was leaked:
http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/ipod-nano-4g-leaked-in-actual-factual-really-real-spy-photo/

Then again, there's no way to prove that picture is real either. I guess the crappier leaked picture should be the one to go then?]]>Sep 7th 2008 12:05PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 7th 2008 9:22PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 6:44AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 4:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 9:45PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 6:45AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 10:58AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/
SHINANAGINS!!!

EVERY ONE GET THEIR BROOMS!]]>Sep 6th 2008 11:54AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 1:59PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/
Can't we just wait?!]]>Sep 6th 2008 6:45AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 8:17AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/]]>Sep 6th 2008 2:56PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 1:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/
If this is the real thing then I have official got bored of the iPod Nano.]]>Sep 12th 2008 4:24AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 6:45AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 6:46AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 6:49AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/
Can engadget just not trust this JR guy who just sits at home photoshopping this shit]]>Sep 6th 2008 10:21AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 3:18PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 6:47AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 6:48AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 6:49AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 9:20AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 6:51AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 9:09AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 6:53AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/
:)]]>Sep 6th 2008 6:54AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 6:57AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/[Expletive]

Unless it receives the magic touch of Jobs, I will never want to lay my eyes on this again]]>Sep 6th 2008 7:01AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/
I do not even think i want to know about his "magic touch" sounds like Michael Jackson]]>Sep 6th 2008 8:52AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 9:33AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/06/supposed-ipod-nano-4g-really-unboxed/Sep 6th 2008 7:02AM